An investigation into the stability and degradation of plastics in aquatic environments using a large-scale field-deployment study

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2024-03, Vol.917, p.170301-170301, Article 170301
• Main Authors: Theobald, Beatrix, Risani, Regis, Donaldson, Lloyd, Bridson, James H., Kingsbury, Joanne M., Pantos, Olga, Weaver, Louise, Lear, Gavin, Pochon, Xavier, Zaiko, Anastasija, Smith, Dawn A., Anderson, Ross, Davy, Ben, Davy, Steph, Doake, Fraser, Masterton, Hayden, Audrezet, François, Maday, Stefan D.M., Wallbank, Jessica A., Barbier, Maxime, Greene, Angelique F., Parker, Kate, Harris, Jessica, Northcott, Grant L., Abbel, Robert
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Artificial ageing; Biodegradation; Marine environment; Polymeric material; Wastewater treatment plant
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170301

The fragmentation of plastic debris is a key pathway to the formation of microplastic pollution. These disintegration processes depend on the materials' physical and chemical characteristics, but insight into these interrelationships is still limited, especially under natural conditions. Five plastics of known polymer/additive compositions and processing histories were deployed in aquatic environments and recovered after six and twelve months. The polymer types used were linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), oxo-degradable LLDPE (oxoLLDPE), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyamide-6 (PA6), and poly(lactic acid) (PLA). Four geographically distinct locations across Aotearoa/New Zealand were chosen: three marine sites and a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Accelerated UV-weathering under controlled laboratory conditions was also carried out to evaluate artificial ageing as a model for plastic degradation in the natural environment. The samples' physical characteristics and surface microstructures were studied for each deployment location and exposure time. The strongest effects were found for oxoLLDPE upon artificial ageing, with increased crystallinity, intense surface cracking, and substantial deterioration of its mechanical properties. However, no changes to the same extent were found after recovery of the deployed material. In the deployment environments, the chemical nature of the plastics was the most relevant factor determining their behaviours. Few significant differences between the four aquatic locations were identified, except for PA6, where indications for biological surface degradation were found only in seawater, not the WWTP. In some cases, artificial ageing reasonably mimicked the changes which some plastic properties underwent in aquatic environments, but generally, it was no reliable model for natural degradation processes. The findings from this study have implications for the understanding of the initial phases of plastic degradation in aquatic environments, eventually leading to microplastics formation. They can also guide the interpretation of accelerated laboratory ageing for the fate of aquatic plastic pollution, and for the testing of aged plastic samples. [Display omitted] •Five types of plastic were deployed at four aquatic sites for up to one year.•Their properties were studied as a function of exposure duration and location.•The main driver for differences in degradation was the plastics' composition.•No major fragmentat