Loading…
Next steps for workplace‐based assessments of entrustable professional activities
Background Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (FIU‐HWCOM) participated in the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) implementation pilot. Entrustment decision processes based on data from workplace‐based assessments (WBAs) were piloted. Outcomes illus...
Saved in:
Published in: | The clinical teacher 2024-08, Vol.21 (4), p.e13739-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2859-3c40bd9d158ecccbf0a0a979b3a5118fc1a8c77b209988a48d9d0fb71c877f343 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e13739 |
container_title | The clinical teacher |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Stumbar, Sarah E. Eliason, Sarah Toonkel, Rebecca Amie, Katrina Bonnin, Rodolfo Gralnik, Leonard Kantor, Julie Minor, Suzanne |
description | Background
Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (FIU‐HWCOM) participated in the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) implementation pilot. Entrustment decision processes based on data from workplace‐based assessments (WBAs) were piloted. Outcomes illustrated challenges including variability across EPAs with regards to learner level alignment and feasibility of data collection in the form of WBAs. In addition, students reported discomfort requesting WBA completion by preceptors and dissatisfaction with associated feedback.
Approach
To guide future directions, we conducted a survey of third‐year students to better understand their experience with and perceptions of WBAs used to evaluate EPAs at FIU‐HWCOM.
Evaluation
Survey response was 96% (n = 107/112). Most (84%) reported that WBAs were not valuable to their development and that preceptors often did not complete WBAs in a timely fashion. Many (47%) reported not receiving verbal feedback. Most students (78%) used language in written responses demonstrating confusion between the EPAs and the WBAs used to assess them.
Implications
The use of WBAs to assess EPAs did not have its intended impact at FIU‐HWCOM. For future classes, WBA forms will consist of paper cards with questions directly assessing performance of skills aligned with EPAs 1, 5 and 6 only. To continue to promote feedback, students will be required to collect WBAs on all clerkships, but the number of required WBAs will be less than prior and no entrustment decisions will be made. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tct.13739 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2922450943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922450943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2859-3c40bd9d158ecccbf0a0a979b3a5118fc1a8c77b209988a48d9d0fb71c877f343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQRi0EoqWw4ALIS1ik2HEi20tU8SdVsKBI7CzbsaVA0oSMQ-mOI3BGToIhpTtm8400T59GD6FjSqY0znmwYUoZZ3IHjSnPWJJJ8bS73TkdoQOAZ0IYoZLuoxETjFIp8jF6uHPvAUNwLWDfdHjVdC9tpa37-vg0GlyBNYADqN0yAG48jtn1ELSpHG67xsdb2Sx1hbUN5VsZSgeHaM_rCtzRJifo8epyMbtJ5vfXt7OLeWJTkcuE2YyYQhY0F85aazzRREsuDdM5pcJbqoXl3KRESiF0JiJLvOHUCs49y9gEnQ698Y_X3kFQdQnWVZVeuqYHlco0zXIiMxbRswG1XQPQOa_arqx1t1aUqB-HKjpUvw4je7Kp7U3tii35Jy0C5wOwKiu3_r9JLWaLofIbo4d-Gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922450943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Next steps for workplace‐based assessments of entrustable professional activities</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Stumbar, Sarah E. ; Eliason, Sarah ; Toonkel, Rebecca ; Amie, Katrina ; Bonnin, Rodolfo ; Gralnik, Leonard ; Kantor, Julie ; Minor, Suzanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Stumbar, Sarah E. ; Eliason, Sarah ; Toonkel, Rebecca ; Amie, Katrina ; Bonnin, Rodolfo ; Gralnik, Leonard ; Kantor, Julie ; Minor, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (FIU‐HWCOM) participated in the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) implementation pilot. Entrustment decision processes based on data from workplace‐based assessments (WBAs) were piloted. Outcomes illustrated challenges including variability across EPAs with regards to learner level alignment and feasibility of data collection in the form of WBAs. In addition, students reported discomfort requesting WBA completion by preceptors and dissatisfaction with associated feedback.
Approach
To guide future directions, we conducted a survey of third‐year students to better understand their experience with and perceptions of WBAs used to evaluate EPAs at FIU‐HWCOM.
Evaluation
Survey response was 96% (n = 107/112). Most (84%) reported that WBAs were not valuable to their development and that preceptors often did not complete WBAs in a timely fashion. Many (47%) reported not receiving verbal feedback. Most students (78%) used language in written responses demonstrating confusion between the EPAs and the WBAs used to assess them.
Implications
The use of WBAs to assess EPAs did not have its intended impact at FIU‐HWCOM. For future classes, WBA forms will consist of paper cards with questions directly assessing performance of skills aligned with EPAs 1, 5 and 6 only. To continue to promote feedback, students will be required to collect WBAs on all clerkships, but the number of required WBAs will be less than prior and no entrustment decisions will be made.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-4971</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1743-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-498X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tct.13739</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38311985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Competency-Based Education ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Educational Measurement - standards ; Florida ; Humans ; Pilot Projects ; Preceptorship - standards ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>The clinical teacher, 2024-08, Vol.21 (4), p.e13739-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2859-3c40bd9d158ecccbf0a0a979b3a5118fc1a8c77b209988a48d9d0fb71c877f343</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3238-1226 ; 0000-0002-0736-5622</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38311985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stumbar, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliason, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toonkel, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amie, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnin, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gralnik, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantor, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minor, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><title>Next steps for workplace‐based assessments of entrustable professional activities</title><title>The clinical teacher</title><addtitle>Clin Teach</addtitle><description>Background
Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (FIU‐HWCOM) participated in the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) implementation pilot. Entrustment decision processes based on data from workplace‐based assessments (WBAs) were piloted. Outcomes illustrated challenges including variability across EPAs with regards to learner level alignment and feasibility of data collection in the form of WBAs. In addition, students reported discomfort requesting WBA completion by preceptors and dissatisfaction with associated feedback.
Approach
To guide future directions, we conducted a survey of third‐year students to better understand their experience with and perceptions of WBAs used to evaluate EPAs at FIU‐HWCOM.
Evaluation
Survey response was 96% (n = 107/112). Most (84%) reported that WBAs were not valuable to their development and that preceptors often did not complete WBAs in a timely fashion. Many (47%) reported not receiving verbal feedback. Most students (78%) used language in written responses demonstrating confusion between the EPAs and the WBAs used to assess them.
Implications
The use of WBAs to assess EPAs did not have its intended impact at FIU‐HWCOM. For future classes, WBA forms will consist of paper cards with questions directly assessing performance of skills aligned with EPAs 1, 5 and 6 only. To continue to promote feedback, students will be required to collect WBAs on all clerkships, but the number of required WBAs will be less than prior and no entrustment decisions will be made.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Competency-Based Education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Preceptorship - standards</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1743-4971</issn><issn>1743-498X</issn><issn>1743-498X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQRi0EoqWw4ALIS1ik2HEi20tU8SdVsKBI7CzbsaVA0oSMQ-mOI3BGToIhpTtm8400T59GD6FjSqY0znmwYUoZZ3IHjSnPWJJJ8bS73TkdoQOAZ0IYoZLuoxETjFIp8jF6uHPvAUNwLWDfdHjVdC9tpa37-vg0GlyBNYADqN0yAG48jtn1ELSpHG67xsdb2Sx1hbUN5VsZSgeHaM_rCtzRJifo8epyMbtJ5vfXt7OLeWJTkcuE2YyYQhY0F85aazzRREsuDdM5pcJbqoXl3KRESiF0JiJLvOHUCs49y9gEnQ698Y_X3kFQdQnWVZVeuqYHlco0zXIiMxbRswG1XQPQOa_arqx1t1aUqB-HKjpUvw4je7Kp7U3tii35Jy0C5wOwKiu3_r9JLWaLofIbo4d-Gg</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Stumbar, Sarah E.</creator><creator>Eliason, Sarah</creator><creator>Toonkel, Rebecca</creator><creator>Amie, Katrina</creator><creator>Bonnin, Rodolfo</creator><creator>Gralnik, Leonard</creator><creator>Kantor, Julie</creator><creator>Minor, Suzanne</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-1226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-5622</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Next steps for workplace‐based assessments of entrustable professional activities</title><author>Stumbar, Sarah E. ; Eliason, Sarah ; Toonkel, Rebecca ; Amie, Katrina ; Bonnin, Rodolfo ; Gralnik, Leonard ; Kantor, Julie ; Minor, Suzanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2859-3c40bd9d158ecccbf0a0a979b3a5118fc1a8c77b209988a48d9d0fb71c877f343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Competency-Based Education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Preceptorship - standards</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stumbar, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliason, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toonkel, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amie, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnin, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gralnik, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantor, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minor, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The clinical teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stumbar, Sarah E.</au><au>Eliason, Sarah</au><au>Toonkel, Rebecca</au><au>Amie, Katrina</au><au>Bonnin, Rodolfo</au><au>Gralnik, Leonard</au><au>Kantor, Julie</au><au>Minor, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Next steps for workplace‐based assessments of entrustable professional activities</atitle><jtitle>The clinical teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Teach</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e13739</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13739-n/a</pages><issn>1743-4971</issn><issn>1743-498X</issn><eissn>1743-498X</eissn><abstract>Background
Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (FIU‐HWCOM) participated in the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) implementation pilot. Entrustment decision processes based on data from workplace‐based assessments (WBAs) were piloted. Outcomes illustrated challenges including variability across EPAs with regards to learner level alignment and feasibility of data collection in the form of WBAs. In addition, students reported discomfort requesting WBA completion by preceptors and dissatisfaction with associated feedback.
Approach
To guide future directions, we conducted a survey of third‐year students to better understand their experience with and perceptions of WBAs used to evaluate EPAs at FIU‐HWCOM.
Evaluation
Survey response was 96% (n = 107/112). Most (84%) reported that WBAs were not valuable to their development and that preceptors often did not complete WBAs in a timely fashion. Many (47%) reported not receiving verbal feedback. Most students (78%) used language in written responses demonstrating confusion between the EPAs and the WBAs used to assess them.
Implications
The use of WBAs to assess EPAs did not have its intended impact at FIU‐HWCOM. For future classes, WBA forms will consist of paper cards with questions directly assessing performance of skills aligned with EPAs 1, 5 and 6 only. To continue to promote feedback, students will be required to collect WBAs on all clerkships, but the number of required WBAs will be less than prior and no entrustment decisions will be made.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38311985</pmid><doi>10.1111/tct.13739</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-1226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-5622</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1743-4971 |
ispartof | The clinical teacher, 2024-08, Vol.21 (4), p.e13739-n/a |
issn | 1743-4971 1743-498X 1743-498X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2922450943 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Clinical Competence Competency-Based Education Education, Medical, Undergraduate Educational Measurement - methods Educational Measurement - standards Florida Humans Pilot Projects Preceptorship - standards Students, Medical - psychology Workplace |
title | Next steps for workplace‐based assessments of entrustable professional activities |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A42%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Next%20steps%20for%20workplace%E2%80%90based%20assessments%20of%20entrustable%20professional%20activities&rft.jtitle=The%20clinical%20teacher&rft.au=Stumbar,%20Sarah%20E.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e13739&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13739-n/a&rft.issn=1743-4971&rft.eissn=1743-498X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tct.13739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2922450943%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2859-3c40bd9d158ecccbf0a0a979b3a5118fc1a8c77b209988a48d9d0fb71c877f343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922450943&rft_id=info:pmid/38311985&rfr_iscdi=true |