Loading…

Surgeon-administered regional nerve blocks during radical cystectomy: a feasibility study

Objective To describe the technique for surgeon-administered, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (SU-TAP) blocks performed during radical cystectomy as a component of multimodal, perioperative pain management. Methods Retrospective, case series of patients receiving SU-TAP blocks just pri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International urology and nephrology 2024-07, Vol.56 (7), p.2227-2234
Main Authors: Refugia, Justin M., Thakker, Parth U., Roebuck, Emily, Brownstead, Hilary A., Rodriguez, Alejandro R., Tsivian, Matvey
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To describe the technique for surgeon-administered, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (SU-TAP) blocks performed during radical cystectomy as a component of multimodal, perioperative pain management. Methods Retrospective, case series of patients receiving SU-TAP blocks just prior to incision for RC. TAP blocks were performed by the surgeon with a standard technique using US guidance to instill an anesthetic solution. The primary outcome was opioid consumption at the intervals of 0–12, 12–24, 24–36, and 36–48 h postoperatively. Opioid consumption was reported as oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included time to perform SU-TAP blocks, and safety of block procedure. Results 34 patients were included. During the median length of stay of 4 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3–7), only 30/34 (88%) of patients required opioids within the first 12 h post-op, decreasing to 38% by 48 h post-op. The median consumption decreased in the first 48 h from 21 MMEs (IQR 9–38) to 10 MMEs (IQR 8–15) at the 0–12 and 36–48 h intervals, respectively. The median time to perform block procedure was 6 min (IQR 4–8 min) and there were no safety events related to the SU-TAP blocks. Limitations include no comparative arm for opioid consumption. Conclusion Our data suggest that urologists may feasibly perform US-guided TAP blocks as a practical, efficient, and safe method of regional anesthesia. SU-TAP blocks should be considered in ERAS protocols for RC. Future comparative studies on opioid consumption compared to local infiltration and alternative block techniques are warranted.
ISSN:1573-2584
0301-1623
1573-2584
DOI:10.1007/s11255-023-03939-w