Loading…

Are brake response times altered post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections?

To assess if brake response times are altered pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. Brake response times were assessed before and after CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections in a cohort of patients. The average of 3 brake response times was recorded before and 30 min...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of radiology 2024-03, Vol.97 (1156), p.834-837
Main Authors: Hanley, Marion, Eustace, Sarah K, Ryan, David T, McLoughlin, Stephen, Hynes, John P, Kavanagh, Eoin C, Eustace, Stephen J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To assess if brake response times are altered pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. Brake response times were assessed before and after CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections in a cohort of patients. The average of 3 brake response times was recorded before and 30 min after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad. A paired Student t-test was used to compare the times before and after the injections. Forty patients were included in this study. The mean age was 55 years. There were 17 male and 23 female patients. There was no significant difference in the mean pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injection brake response times; 0.94 s (range 0.4-1.2 s) and 0.93 s (range 0.5-1.25 s), respectively (P = .77). Brake response time did not significantly differ pre and 30 min post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. To the authors' best knowledge, there are no current studies assessing brake response times post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. While driving safety cannot be proven by a single metric, it is a useful study in demonstrating that this is not inhibited in a cohort of patients.
ISSN:0007-1285
1748-880X
DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqae034