Relating Tabooness to Humor and Arousal Ratings in American English: What the F Is so Funny?

Emotion can have a profound effect on language processing, and taboo words have been increasingly used in research as highly emotional, negatively valenced stimuli. However, because taboo words as a lexical category are socially constructed and semantically idiosyncratic, they may also have complex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Language and speech 2024-12, Vol.67 (4), p.1121-1134
Main Authors: Shafto, Meredith A., Abrams, Lise, James, Lori E., Hu, Pengbo, Gray, Genevieve
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
American English
Arousal
Emotions
English
Female
Humans
Humor
Language
Language processing
Male
Middle Aged
North American English
Ratings & rankings
Researchers
Semantics
Stimuli
Taboo language
Taboos
Wit and Humor as Topic - psychology
Words
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-5725c00733d093312fa7e5fa26db1a3fd3730ae403ac2ffb88f1fd0a5f93936a3
container_end_page 1134
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1121
container_title Language and speech
container_volume 67
creator Shafto, Meredith A.
Abrams, Lise
James, Lori E.
Hu, Pengbo
Gray, Genevieve
description Emotion can have a profound effect on language processing, and taboo words have been increasingly used in research as highly emotional, negatively valenced stimuli. However, because taboo words as a lexical category are socially constructed and semantically idiosyncratic, they may also have complex emotional characteristics. This complexity may not be fully considered by researchers using taboo words as research stimuli. This study gathered tabooness, humor, and arousal ratings to provide a resource for researchers to better understand the sources and characteristics of the strong emotions generated by taboo words. A total of 411 participants aged 18–83 were recruited via online platforms, and all participants rated the same 264 words on tabooness, humor, and arousal. Analyses indicated that tabooness and humor ratings were positively related to each other, and both were predicted by arousal ratings. The set of ratings included here provides a tool for researchers using taboo stimuli, and our findings highlight methodological considerations while broadening our understanding of the cognitive and linguistic nature of highly emotional language.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00238309241228863
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2927209086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00238309241228863</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2927209086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-5725c00733d093312fa7e5fa26db1a3fd3730ae403ac2ffb88f1fd0a5f93936a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRtFY_gBdZ8OIlurvTZBMvUsRqQRBKxYsQJslum5Ls6m5y6Ld3a_0DiqdhmN9783iEnHB2wbmUl4wJSIFlYsSFSNMEdsiAyziJEhbDLhls7tEGOCCH3q9Y2BOR7pODoIplKkcD8jJTDXa1WdA5FtYa5T3tLL3vW-somoqOne09NnT2QXlaGzpulatLNPTWLJraL6_o8xI72i0VndCpp97SSW_M-vqI7GlsvDr-nEPyNLmd39xHD49305vxQ1SCYF0USxGXjEmAimUAXGiUKtYokqrgCLoCCQzViAGWQusiTTXXFcNYZ5BBgjAk51vfV2ffeuW7vK19qZoGjQrpc5EJKVjGQkNDcvYLXdnemZAuBw4CZJaNeKD4liqd9d4pnb-6ukW3zjnLN9Xnf6oPmtNP575oVfWt-Oo6ABdbwONC_bz93_EdKA2JBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132379941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relating Tabooness to Humor and Arousal Ratings in American English: What the F Is so Funny?</title><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Shafto, Meredith A. ; Abrams, Lise ; James, Lori E. ; Hu, Pengbo ; Gray, Genevieve</creator><creatorcontrib>Shafto, Meredith A. ; Abrams, Lise ; James, Lori E. ; Hu, Pengbo ; Gray, Genevieve</creatorcontrib><description>Emotion can have a profound effect on language processing, and taboo words have been increasingly used in research as highly emotional, negatively valenced stimuli. However, because taboo words as a lexical category are socially constructed and semantically idiosyncratic, they may also have complex emotional characteristics. This complexity may not be fully considered by researchers using taboo words as research stimuli. This study gathered tabooness, humor, and arousal ratings to provide a resource for researchers to better understand the sources and characteristics of the strong emotions generated by taboo words. A total of 411 participants aged 18–83 were recruited via online platforms, and all participants rated the same 264 words on tabooness, humor, and arousal. Analyses indicated that tabooness and humor ratings were positively related to each other, and both were predicted by arousal ratings. The set of ratings included here provides a tool for researchers using taboo stimuli, and our findings highlight methodological considerations while broadening our understanding of the cognitive and linguistic nature of highly emotional language.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8309</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-6053</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00238309241228863</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38357874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; American English ; Arousal ; Emotions ; English ; Female ; Humans ; Humor ; Language ; Language processing ; Male ; Middle Aged ; North American English ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Researchers ; Semantics ; Stimuli ; Taboo language ; Taboos ; Wit and Humor as Topic - psychology ; Words ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Language and speech, 2024-12, Vol.67 (4), p.1121-1134</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-5725c00733d093312fa7e5fa26db1a3fd3730ae403ac2ffb88f1fd0a5f93936a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0016-2013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31269,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38357874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shafto, Meredith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Lori E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Pengbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Genevieve</creatorcontrib><title>Relating Tabooness to Humor and Arousal Ratings in American English: What the F Is so Funny?</title><title>Language and speech</title><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><description>Emotion can have a profound effect on language processing, and taboo words have been increasingly used in research as highly emotional, negatively valenced stimuli. However, because taboo words as a lexical category are socially constructed and semantically idiosyncratic, they may also have complex emotional characteristics. This complexity may not be fully considered by researchers using taboo words as research stimuli. This study gathered tabooness, humor, and arousal ratings to provide a resource for researchers to better understand the sources and characteristics of the strong emotions generated by taboo words. A total of 411 participants aged 18–83 were recruited via online platforms, and all participants rated the same 264 words on tabooness, humor, and arousal. Analyses indicated that tabooness and humor ratings were positively related to each other, and both were predicted by arousal ratings. The set of ratings included here provides a tool for researchers using taboo stimuli, and our findings highlight methodological considerations while broadening our understanding of the cognitive and linguistic nature of highly emotional language.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>American English</subject><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humor</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>North American English</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Taboo language</subject><subject>Taboos</subject><subject>Wit and Humor as Topic - psychology</subject><subject>Words</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0023-8309</issn><issn>1756-6053</issn><issn>1756-6053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRtFY_gBdZ8OIlurvTZBMvUsRqQRBKxYsQJslum5Ls6m5y6Ld3a_0DiqdhmN9783iEnHB2wbmUl4wJSIFlYsSFSNMEdsiAyziJEhbDLhls7tEGOCCH3q9Y2BOR7pODoIplKkcD8jJTDXa1WdA5FtYa5T3tLL3vW-somoqOne09NnT2QXlaGzpulatLNPTWLJraL6_o8xI72i0VndCpp97SSW_M-vqI7GlsvDr-nEPyNLmd39xHD49305vxQ1SCYF0USxGXjEmAimUAXGiUKtYokqrgCLoCCQzViAGWQusiTTXXFcNYZ5BBgjAk51vfV2ffeuW7vK19qZoGjQrpc5EJKVjGQkNDcvYLXdnemZAuBw4CZJaNeKD4liqd9d4pnb-6ukW3zjnLN9Xnf6oPmtNP575oVfWt-Oo6ABdbwONC_bz93_EdKA2JBQ</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Shafto, Meredith A.</creator><creator>Abrams, Lise</creator><creator>James, Lori E.</creator><creator>Hu, Pengbo</creator><creator>Gray, Genevieve</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-2013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Relating Tabooness to Humor and Arousal Ratings in American English: What the F Is so Funny?</title><author>Shafto, Meredith A. ; Abrams, Lise ; James, Lori E. ; Hu, Pengbo ; Gray, Genevieve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-5725c00733d093312fa7e5fa26db1a3fd3730ae403ac2ffb88f1fd0a5f93936a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>American English</topic><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humor</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>North American English</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Taboo language</topic><topic>Taboos</topic><topic>Wit and Humor as Topic - psychology</topic><topic>Words</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shafto, Meredith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Lori E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Pengbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Genevieve</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shafto, Meredith A.</au><au>Abrams, Lise</au><au>James, Lori E.</au><au>Hu, Pengbo</au><au>Gray, Genevieve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relating Tabooness to Humor and Arousal Ratings in American English: What the F Is so Funny?</atitle><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1121</spage><epage>1134</epage><pages>1121-1134</pages><issn>0023-8309</issn><issn>1756-6053</issn><eissn>1756-6053</eissn><abstract>Emotion can have a profound effect on language processing, and taboo words have been increasingly used in research as highly emotional, negatively valenced stimuli. However, because taboo words as a lexical category are socially constructed and semantically idiosyncratic, they may also have complex emotional characteristics. This complexity may not be fully considered by researchers using taboo words as research stimuli. This study gathered tabooness, humor, and arousal ratings to provide a resource for researchers to better understand the sources and characteristics of the strong emotions generated by taboo words. A total of 411 participants aged 18–83 were recruited via online platforms, and all participants rated the same 264 words on tabooness, humor, and arousal. Analyses indicated that tabooness and humor ratings were positively related to each other, and both were predicted by arousal ratings. The set of ratings included here provides a tool for researchers using taboo stimuli, and our findings highlight methodological considerations while broadening our understanding of the cognitive and linguistic nature of highly emotional language.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38357874</pmid><doi>10.1177/00238309241228863</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-2013</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8309
ispartof Language and speech, 2024-12, Vol.67 (4), p.1121-1134
issn 0023-8309
1756-6053
1756-6053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2927209086
source Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sage Journals Online
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
American English
Arousal
Emotions
English
Female
Humans
Humor
Language
Language processing
Male
Middle Aged
North American English
Ratings & rankings
Researchers
Semantics
Stimuli
Taboo language
Taboos
Wit and Humor as Topic - psychology
Words
Young Adult
title Relating Tabooness to Humor and Arousal Ratings in American English: What the F Is so Funny?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A51%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relating%20Tabooness%20to%20Humor%20and%20Arousal%20Ratings%20in%20American%20English:%20What%20the%20F%20Is%20so%20Funny?&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20speech&rft.au=Shafto,%20Meredith%20A.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1121&rft.epage=1134&rft.pages=1121-1134&rft.issn=0023-8309&rft.eissn=1756-6053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00238309241228863&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2927209086%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-5725c00733d093312fa7e5fa26db1a3fd3730ae403ac2ffb88f1fd0a5f93936a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132379941&rft_id=info:pmid/38357874&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00238309241228863&rfr_iscdi=true