Differentiating BRAF V600E- and RAS-like alterations in encapsulated follicular patterned tumors through histologic features: a validation study

• Published in: Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology 2024-04, Vol.484 (4), p.645-656
• Main Authors: Kim, Chankyung, Agarwal, Shipra, Bychkov, Andrey, Hang, Jen-Fan, Harahap, Agnes Stephanie, Hirokawa, Mitsuyoshi, Kakudo, Kennichi, Keelawat, Somboon, Liu, Chih-Yi, Liu, Zhiyan, Nguyen, Truong Phan-Xuan, Rana, Chanchal, Vuong, Huy Gia, Zhu, Yun, Jung, Chan Kwon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Deep learning; Encapsulation; Genotypes; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Optical density; Original Article; Papillae; Pathology; Thyroid; Thyroid gland; Tumors
• ISSN: 0945-6317; 1432-2307
• DOI: 10.1007/s00428-024-03761-4

Differentiating BRAF V600E- and RAS -altered encapsulated follicular-patterned thyroid tumors based on morphology remains challenging. This study aimed to validate an 8-score scale nuclear scoring system and investigate the importance of nuclear pseudoinclusions (NPIs) in aiding this differentiation. A cohort of 44 encapsulated follicular-patterned tumors with varying degrees of nuclear atypia and confirmed BRAF V600E or RAS alterations was studied. Nuclear parameters (area, diameter, and optical density) were analyzed using a deep learning model. Twelve pathologists from eight Asian countries visually assessed 22 cases after excluding the cases with any papillae. Eight nuclear features were applied, yielding a semi-quantitative score from 0 to 24. A threshold score of 14 was used to distinguish between RAS - and BRAF V600E-altered tumors. BRAF V600E-altered tumors typically demonstrated higher nuclear scores and notable morphometric alterations. Specifically, the nuclear area and diameter were significantly larger, and nuclear optical density was much lower compared to RAS -altered tumors. Observer accuracy varied, with two pathologists correctly identifying genotype of all cases. Observers were categorized into proficiency groups, with the highest group maintaining consistent accuracy across both evaluation methods. The lower group showed a significant improvement in accuracy upon utilizing the 8-score scale nuclear scoring system, with notably increased sensitivity and negative predictive value in BRAF V600E tumor detection. BRAF V600E-altered tumors had higher median total nuclear scores. Detailed reevaluation revealed NPIs in all BRAF V600E-altered cases, but in only 2 of 14 RAS -altered cases. These results could significantly assist pathologists, particularly those not specializing in thyroid pathology, in making a more accurate diagnosis.