Socio-economic disadvantage and utilisation of labour epidural analgesia in Scotland: a population-based study

• Published in: Anaesthesia 2024-05, Vol.79 (5), p.473-485
• Main Authors: Halliday, L, Shaw, M, Kyzayeva, A, Lawlor, D A, Nelson, S M, Kearns, R J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analgesia; Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects; Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects; Analgesics; Child; Childbirth & labor; Children; Deprivation; Epidural; Female; Health disparities; Humans; Indication; Labor Pain - drug therapy; Labor, Obstetric; Pain management; Pain perception; Population studies; Pregnancy; Risk; Safety; Scotland; Socioeconomic Factors; Well being
• ISSN: 0003-2409; 1365-2044
• DOI: 10.1111/anae.16236

Socio-economic deprivation is associated with adverse maternal and childhood outcomes. Epidural analgesia, the gold standard for labour analgesia, may improve maternal well-being. We assessed the association of socio-economic status with utilisation of epidural analgesia and whether this differed when epidural analgesia was advisable for maternal safety. This was a population-based study of NHS data for all women in labour in Scotland between 1 January 2007 and 23 October 2020, excluding elective caesarean sections. Socio-economic status deciles were defined using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. Medical conditions for which epidural analgesia is advisable for maternal safety (medical indications) and contraindications were defined according to national guidelines. Of 593,230 patients in labour, 131,521 (22.2%) received epidural analgesia. Those from the most deprived areas were 16% less likely to receive epidural analgesia than the most affluent (relative risk 0.84 [95%CI 0.82-0.85]), with the inter-decile mean change in receiving epidural analgesia estimated at -2% ([95%CI -2.2% to -1.7%]). Among the 21,219 deliveries with a documented medical indication for epidural analgesia, the socio-economic gradient persisted (relative risk 0.79 [95%CI 0.75-0.84], inter-decile mean change in receiving epidural analgesia -2.5% [95%CI -3.1% to -2.0%]). Women in the most deprived areas with a medical indication for epidural analgesia were still less likely (absolute risk 0.23 [95%CI 0.22-0.24]) to receive epidural analgesia than women from the most advantaged decile without a medical indication (absolute risk 0.25 [95%CI 0.24-0.25]). Socio-economic deprivation is associated with lower utilisation of epidural analgesia, even when epidural analgesia is advisable for maternal safety. Ensuring equitable access to an intervention that alleviates pain and potentially reduces adverse outcomes is crucial.