Loading…

Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation

Aim We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS 2024-04, Vol.21 (2), p.e12583-n/a
Main Authors: Kikuchi, Mami, Ikeda, Atsuko, Hirano, Michiyo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page e12583
container_title Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS
container_volume 21
creator Kikuchi, Mami
Ikeda, Atsuko
Hirano, Michiyo
description Aim We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale. Methods Participants consisted of 1000 men and women aged 65 years or older, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while concurrent validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient using the internal consistency method, and the stability coefficient was confirmed using the test–retest method. Results Responses were received from 380 participants, and 358 participants who responded to all items were included in the analysis. The developed scale comprised 22 items with three factors: “Perception of Inclusion” (α = .947), “Perception of Reciprocity through Reception” (α = .937), and “Perception of Reciprocity through Provision” (α = .910). Correlation analyses indicated that concurrent scales were positively correlated with Ikigai and negatively correlated with loneliness on the total scale. The model fit was comparative fit index = 0.933, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.854, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.818, and root mean square of approximation = 0.081. The stability coefficient of the total scale scores was 0.875 (95% CI: [0.830, 0.908]). Conclusions The developed scale had adequate reliability and validity. The perceptions of connectedness measured using this scale can be used by public health and nursing care professionals to prevent loneliness and isolation among older adults living in the community.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jjns.12583
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929033835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2929033835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbFuFDEQhi0EIiHQ8ADIEg1CurD2bHZtuuiAQBQRRKC2vPZY-OS1N-vdRNel4AFo83p5Eny5JAUF03hsffNp5J-Ql6zaZ6XerVYx7zN-IOAR2WVtzRet5PXjhx74DnmW86qqgIGAp2QHBGeNFGyX_P6AFxjS0GOcaHL0NFgc6aGdw5Rvrq7pNxwNDpNPMdMU6TL1_Rz9tL65-tPpjLa8xIhmQhsxZ3rpp19lJg0B6ZnRAd_T7xi87nwoQ1RHSy908HZzwdLNeqN-Tp44HTK-uDv3yM9PH38sPy9OTo--LA9PFgZYA4vOGFdDa2vXdq6x0smGY6lONAycsbKpjasEOtvqBixHLjppmWAFROAc9sibrXcY0_mMeVK9zwZD0BHTnBWXXFZQvuigoK__QVdpHmPZTkHFW9kAF1Cot1vKjCnnEZ0aRt_rca1YpTbZqE026jabAr-6U85dj_YBvQ-jAGwLXPqA6_-o1PHx17Ot9C97Qp5J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3027963283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kikuchi, Mami ; Ikeda, Atsuko ; Hirano, Michiyo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Mami ; Ikeda, Atsuko ; Hirano, Michiyo</creatorcontrib><description>Aim We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale. Methods Participants consisted of 1000 men and women aged 65 years or older, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while concurrent validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient using the internal consistency method, and the stability coefficient was confirmed using the test–retest method. Results Responses were received from 380 participants, and 358 participants who responded to all items were included in the analysis. The developed scale comprised 22 items with three factors: “Perception of Inclusion” (α = .947), “Perception of Reciprocity through Reception” (α = .937), and “Perception of Reciprocity through Provision” (α = .910). Correlation analyses indicated that concurrent scales were positively correlated with Ikigai and negatively correlated with loneliness on the total scale. The model fit was comparative fit index = 0.933, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.854, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.818, and root mean square of approximation = 0.081. The stability coefficient of the total scale scores was 0.875 (95% CI: [0.830, 0.908]). Conclusions The developed scale had adequate reliability and validity. The perceptions of connectedness measured using this scale can be used by public health and nursing care professionals to prevent loneliness and isolation among older adults living in the community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-7924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38216981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>aged ; community ; connectedness ; Loneliness ; nursing care ; Older people ; Perceptions ; psychological well‐being ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; scale development ; Social interaction ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2024-04, Vol.21 (2), p.e12583-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Japan Academy of Nursing Science.</rights><rights>2024 Japan Academy of Nursing Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2496-8505</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38216981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Mami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Michiyo</creatorcontrib><title>Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation</title><title>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</title><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><description>Aim We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale. Methods Participants consisted of 1000 men and women aged 65 years or older, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while concurrent validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient using the internal consistency method, and the stability coefficient was confirmed using the test–retest method. Results Responses were received from 380 participants, and 358 participants who responded to all items were included in the analysis. The developed scale comprised 22 items with three factors: “Perception of Inclusion” (α = .947), “Perception of Reciprocity through Reception” (α = .937), and “Perception of Reciprocity through Provision” (α = .910). Correlation analyses indicated that concurrent scales were positively correlated with Ikigai and negatively correlated with loneliness on the total scale. The model fit was comparative fit index = 0.933, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.854, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.818, and root mean square of approximation = 0.081. The stability coefficient of the total scale scores was 0.875 (95% CI: [0.830, 0.908]). Conclusions The developed scale had adequate reliability and validity. The perceptions of connectedness measured using this scale can be used by public health and nursing care professionals to prevent loneliness and isolation among older adults living in the community.</description><subject>aged</subject><subject>community</subject><subject>connectedness</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>nursing care</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>psychological well‐being</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>scale development</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1742-7932</issn><issn>1742-7924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kbFuFDEQhi0EIiHQ8ADIEg1CurD2bHZtuuiAQBQRRKC2vPZY-OS1N-vdRNel4AFo83p5Eny5JAUF03hsffNp5J-Ql6zaZ6XerVYx7zN-IOAR2WVtzRet5PXjhx74DnmW86qqgIGAp2QHBGeNFGyX_P6AFxjS0GOcaHL0NFgc6aGdw5Rvrq7pNxwNDpNPMdMU6TL1_Rz9tL65-tPpjLa8xIhmQhsxZ3rpp19lJg0B6ZnRAd_T7xi87nwoQ1RHSy908HZzwdLNeqN-Tp44HTK-uDv3yM9PH38sPy9OTo--LA9PFgZYA4vOGFdDa2vXdq6x0smGY6lONAycsbKpjasEOtvqBixHLjppmWAFROAc9sibrXcY0_mMeVK9zwZD0BHTnBWXXFZQvuigoK__QVdpHmPZTkHFW9kAF1Cot1vKjCnnEZ0aRt_rca1YpTbZqE026jabAr-6U85dj_YBvQ-jAGwLXPqA6_-o1PHx17Ot9C97Qp5J</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Kikuchi, Mami</creator><creator>Ikeda, Atsuko</creator><creator>Hirano, Michiyo</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-8505</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation</title><author>Kikuchi, Mami ; Ikeda, Atsuko ; Hirano, Michiyo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>aged</topic><topic>community</topic><topic>connectedness</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>nursing care</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>psychological well‐being</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>scale development</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Mami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Michiyo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kikuchi, Mami</au><au>Ikeda, Atsuko</au><au>Hirano, Michiyo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e12583</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12583-n/a</pages><issn>1742-7932</issn><eissn>1742-7924</eissn><abstract>Aim We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale. Methods Participants consisted of 1000 men and women aged 65 years or older, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while concurrent validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient using the internal consistency method, and the stability coefficient was confirmed using the test–retest method. Results Responses were received from 380 participants, and 358 participants who responded to all items were included in the analysis. The developed scale comprised 22 items with three factors: “Perception of Inclusion” (α = .947), “Perception of Reciprocity through Reception” (α = .937), and “Perception of Reciprocity through Provision” (α = .910). Correlation analyses indicated that concurrent scales were positively correlated with Ikigai and negatively correlated with loneliness on the total scale. The model fit was comparative fit index = 0.933, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.854, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.818, and root mean square of approximation = 0.081. The stability coefficient of the total scale scores was 0.875 (95% CI: [0.830, 0.908]). Conclusions The developed scale had adequate reliability and validity. The perceptions of connectedness measured using this scale can be used by public health and nursing care professionals to prevent loneliness and isolation among older adults living in the community.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38216981</pmid><doi>10.1111/jjns.12583</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-8505</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-7932
ispartof Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2024-04, Vol.21 (2), p.e12583-n/a
issn 1742-7932
1742-7924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929033835
source Wiley
subjects aged
community
connectedness
Loneliness
nursing care
Older people
Perceptions
psychological well‐being
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
scale development
Social interaction
Validity
title Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20Older%20Adults%E2%80%99%20Perceptions%20on%20Community%E2%80%90based%20Connectedness%20with%20People%20Scale:%20Reliability%20and%20validity%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Japan%20journal%20of%20nursing%20science%20:%20JJNS&rft.au=Kikuchi,%20Mami&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e12583&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12583-n/a&rft.issn=1742-7932&rft.eissn=1742-7924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jjns.12583&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2929033835%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3027963283&rft_id=info:pmid/38216981&rfr_iscdi=true