Loading…
Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation
Aim We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS 2024-04, Vol.21 (2), p.e12583-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e12583 |
container_title | Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Kikuchi, Mami Ikeda, Atsuko Hirano, Michiyo |
description | Aim
We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale.
Methods
Participants consisted of 1000 men and women aged 65 years or older, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while concurrent validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient using the internal consistency method, and the stability coefficient was confirmed using the test–retest method.
Results
Responses were received from 380 participants, and 358 participants who responded to all items were included in the analysis. The developed scale comprised 22 items with three factors: “Perception of Inclusion” (α = .947), “Perception of Reciprocity through Reception” (α = .937), and “Perception of Reciprocity through Provision” (α = .910). Correlation analyses indicated that concurrent scales were positively correlated with Ikigai and negatively correlated with loneliness on the total scale. The model fit was comparative fit index = 0.933, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.854, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.818, and root mean square of approximation = 0.081. The stability coefficient of the total scale scores was 0.875 (95% CI: [0.830, 0.908]).
Conclusions
The developed scale had adequate reliability and validity. The perceptions of connectedness measured using this scale can be used by public health and nursing care professionals to prevent loneliness and isolation among older adults living in the community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jjns.12583 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929033835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2929033835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbFuFDEQhi0EIiHQ8ADIEg1CurD2bHZtuuiAQBQRRKC2vPZY-OS1N-vdRNel4AFo83p5Eny5JAUF03hsffNp5J-Ql6zaZ6XerVYx7zN-IOAR2WVtzRet5PXjhx74DnmW86qqgIGAp2QHBGeNFGyX_P6AFxjS0GOcaHL0NFgc6aGdw5Rvrq7pNxwNDpNPMdMU6TL1_Rz9tL65-tPpjLa8xIhmQhsxZ3rpp19lJg0B6ZnRAd_T7xi87nwoQ1RHSy908HZzwdLNeqN-Tp44HTK-uDv3yM9PH38sPy9OTo--LA9PFgZYA4vOGFdDa2vXdq6x0smGY6lONAycsbKpjasEOtvqBixHLjppmWAFROAc9sibrXcY0_mMeVK9zwZD0BHTnBWXXFZQvuigoK__QVdpHmPZTkHFW9kAF1Cot1vKjCnnEZ0aRt_rca1YpTbZqE026jabAr-6U85dj_YBvQ-jAGwLXPqA6_-o1PHx17Ot9C97Qp5J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3027963283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kikuchi, Mami ; Ikeda, Atsuko ; Hirano, Michiyo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Mami ; Ikeda, Atsuko ; Hirano, Michiyo</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale.
Methods
Participants consisted of 1000 men and women aged 65 years or older, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while concurrent validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient using the internal consistency method, and the stability coefficient was confirmed using the test–retest method.
Results
Responses were received from 380 participants, and 358 participants who responded to all items were included in the analysis. The developed scale comprised 22 items with three factors: “Perception of Inclusion” (α = .947), “Perception of Reciprocity through Reception” (α = .937), and “Perception of Reciprocity through Provision” (α = .910). Correlation analyses indicated that concurrent scales were positively correlated with Ikigai and negatively correlated with loneliness on the total scale. The model fit was comparative fit index = 0.933, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.854, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.818, and root mean square of approximation = 0.081. The stability coefficient of the total scale scores was 0.875 (95% CI: [0.830, 0.908]).
Conclusions
The developed scale had adequate reliability and validity. The perceptions of connectedness measured using this scale can be used by public health and nursing care professionals to prevent loneliness and isolation among older adults living in the community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-7924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38216981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>aged ; community ; connectedness ; Loneliness ; nursing care ; Older people ; Perceptions ; psychological well‐being ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; scale development ; Social interaction ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2024-04, Vol.21 (2), p.e12583-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Japan Academy of Nursing Science.</rights><rights>2024 Japan Academy of Nursing Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2496-8505</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38216981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Mami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Michiyo</creatorcontrib><title>Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation</title><title>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</title><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><description>Aim
We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale.
Methods
Participants consisted of 1000 men and women aged 65 years or older, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while concurrent validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient using the internal consistency method, and the stability coefficient was confirmed using the test–retest method.
Results
Responses were received from 380 participants, and 358 participants who responded to all items were included in the analysis. The developed scale comprised 22 items with three factors: “Perception of Inclusion” (α = .947), “Perception of Reciprocity through Reception” (α = .937), and “Perception of Reciprocity through Provision” (α = .910). Correlation analyses indicated that concurrent scales were positively correlated with Ikigai and negatively correlated with loneliness on the total scale. The model fit was comparative fit index = 0.933, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.854, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.818, and root mean square of approximation = 0.081. The stability coefficient of the total scale scores was 0.875 (95% CI: [0.830, 0.908]).
Conclusions
The developed scale had adequate reliability and validity. The perceptions of connectedness measured using this scale can be used by public health and nursing care professionals to prevent loneliness and isolation among older adults living in the community.</description><subject>aged</subject><subject>community</subject><subject>connectedness</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>nursing care</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>psychological well‐being</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>scale development</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1742-7932</issn><issn>1742-7924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kbFuFDEQhi0EIiHQ8ADIEg1CurD2bHZtuuiAQBQRRKC2vPZY-OS1N-vdRNel4AFo83p5Eny5JAUF03hsffNp5J-Ql6zaZ6XerVYx7zN-IOAR2WVtzRet5PXjhx74DnmW86qqgIGAp2QHBGeNFGyX_P6AFxjS0GOcaHL0NFgc6aGdw5Rvrq7pNxwNDpNPMdMU6TL1_Rz9tL65-tPpjLa8xIhmQhsxZ3rpp19lJg0B6ZnRAd_T7xi87nwoQ1RHSy908HZzwdLNeqN-Tp44HTK-uDv3yM9PH38sPy9OTo--LA9PFgZYA4vOGFdDa2vXdq6x0smGY6lONAycsbKpjasEOtvqBixHLjppmWAFROAc9sibrXcY0_mMeVK9zwZD0BHTnBWXXFZQvuigoK__QVdpHmPZTkHFW9kAF1Cot1vKjCnnEZ0aRt_rca1YpTbZqE026jabAr-6U85dj_YBvQ-jAGwLXPqA6_-o1PHx17Ot9C97Qp5J</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Kikuchi, Mami</creator><creator>Ikeda, Atsuko</creator><creator>Hirano, Michiyo</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-8505</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation</title><author>Kikuchi, Mami ; Ikeda, Atsuko ; Hirano, Michiyo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>aged</topic><topic>community</topic><topic>connectedness</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>nursing care</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>psychological well‐being</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>scale development</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Mami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirano, Michiyo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kikuchi, Mami</au><au>Ikeda, Atsuko</au><au>Hirano, Michiyo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e12583</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12583-n/a</pages><issn>1742-7932</issn><eissn>1742-7924</eissn><abstract>Aim
We developed a self‐assessment scale—Older Adults' Perceptions of Community‐based Connectedness with People—to assess older adults' comprehensive perceptions of their connectedness with others in the community. A specific aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale.
Methods
Participants consisted of 1000 men and women aged 65 years or older, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Factorial validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while concurrent validity was assessed using correlation analysis. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's α coefficient using the internal consistency method, and the stability coefficient was confirmed using the test–retest method.
Results
Responses were received from 380 participants, and 358 participants who responded to all items were included in the analysis. The developed scale comprised 22 items with three factors: “Perception of Inclusion” (α = .947), “Perception of Reciprocity through Reception” (α = .937), and “Perception of Reciprocity through Provision” (α = .910). Correlation analyses indicated that concurrent scales were positively correlated with Ikigai and negatively correlated with loneliness on the total scale. The model fit was comparative fit index = 0.933, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.854, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.818, and root mean square of approximation = 0.081. The stability coefficient of the total scale scores was 0.875 (95% CI: [0.830, 0.908]).
Conclusions
The developed scale had adequate reliability and validity. The perceptions of connectedness measured using this scale can be used by public health and nursing care professionals to prevent loneliness and isolation among older adults living in the community.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38216981</pmid><doi>10.1111/jjns.12583</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-8505</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-7932 |
ispartof | Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2024-04, Vol.21 (2), p.e12583-n/a |
issn | 1742-7932 1742-7924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929033835 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | aged community connectedness Loneliness nursing care Older people Perceptions psychological well‐being Quantitative psychology Questionnaires scale development Social interaction Validity |
title | Development of Older Adults’ Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20Older%20Adults%E2%80%99%20Perceptions%20on%20Community%E2%80%90based%20Connectedness%20with%20People%20Scale:%20Reliability%20and%20validity%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Japan%20journal%20of%20nursing%20science%20:%20JJNS&rft.au=Kikuchi,%20Mami&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e12583&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12583-n/a&rft.issn=1742-7932&rft.eissn=1742-7924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jjns.12583&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2929033835%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-bccf437d4f7bf6d9f962eeeeb8613fcd964cf08efd7a63d2e28b9d181f96e3223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3027963283&rft_id=info:pmid/38216981&rfr_iscdi=true |