Loading…
The Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients
The elderly population is unique and the prognostic scoring systems developed for the adult population need to be validated. We evaluated the predictive value of frequently used scoring systems on mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients. In this single-center, observational, prospective...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of infection in developing countries 2024-01, Vol.18 (1), p.122-130 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 130 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 122 |
container_title | Journal of infection in developing countries |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Tekin, Bilal Kiliç, Jehat Taşkin, Gürhan Solmaz, İhsan Tezel, Onur Başgöz, Bilgin Bahadır |
description | The elderly population is unique and the prognostic scoring systems developed for the adult population need to be validated. We evaluated the predictive value of frequently used scoring systems on mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients.
In this single-center, observational, prospective study, critically ill elderly sepsis patients were evaluated. Sequential organ failure evaluation score (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score-II (APACHE-II), logistic organ dysfunction score (LODS), multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), and simplified acute physiology score-II (SAPS-II) were calculated. The participants were followed up for 28 days for in-hospital mortality. Prognostic scoring systems, demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and baseline laboratory findings were compared between "survivor" and "non-survivor" groups.
202 patients with a mean age of 79 (interquartile range, IQR: 11) years were included, and 51% (n = 103) were female. The overall mortality was 41% (n = 83). SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II scores were significantly higher in the non-survivor group (p < 0.001), and higher scores were correlated with higher mortality. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) - area under curve (AUC) values were 0.802, 0.784, 0.735, 0.702 and 0.780 for SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II, respectively. All prognostic scoring models had a significant discriminative ability on the prediction of mortality among critically ill elderly sepsis patients (p < 0.001).
This study showed that SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II scores are significantly associated with 28-day mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients, and can be successfully used for predicting mortality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3855/jidc.18526 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929540809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2929540809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-8108be3f3d7067fbf514b8188da068891fbab6b9ad57dd470224d7945bc93d433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLxDAUhYMojq-NP0ACbkSmmjRNk7gr42tgZAZmXJe0STVDX-a2i_n3dsYH4ubeA_fjcDkHoXNKbpjk_HbtTH5DJQ_jPXRElQiDMJZk_48eoWOANSFcMU4P0YhJJgRR6gj1q3eLJ03Vau-gqXFTYMgb7-o3DBvobAV3eDl_TMY4WSST54dgOh3j2fx-OcYvu6lrg5fJYjkcsKtx7l3ncl2WG-zKEtvSWD9osC04wK3unK07OEUHhS7Bnn3vE_T6-LCaPAez-dN0ksyCPBRRF0hKZGZZwYwgsSiygtMok1RKo0kspaJFprM4U9pwYUwkSBhGRqiIZ7liJmLsBF19-ba--egtdGnlILdlqWvb9JCGKlQ8IpKoAb38h66b3tfDdymjjIpYCLY1vP6ict8AeFukrXeV9puUknRbRrotI92VMcAX35Z9Vlnzi_6kzz4BGP2Bhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3131767733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Tekin, Bilal ; Kiliç, Jehat ; Taşkin, Gürhan ; Solmaz, İhsan ; Tezel, Onur ; Başgöz, Bilgin Bahadır</creator><creatorcontrib>Tekin, Bilal ; Kiliç, Jehat ; Taşkin, Gürhan ; Solmaz, İhsan ; Tezel, Onur ; Başgöz, Bilgin Bahadır</creatorcontrib><description>The elderly population is unique and the prognostic scoring systems developed for the adult population need to be validated. We evaluated the predictive value of frequently used scoring systems on mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients.
In this single-center, observational, prospective study, critically ill elderly sepsis patients were evaluated. Sequential organ failure evaluation score (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score-II (APACHE-II), logistic organ dysfunction score (LODS), multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), and simplified acute physiology score-II (SAPS-II) were calculated. The participants were followed up for 28 days for in-hospital mortality. Prognostic scoring systems, demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and baseline laboratory findings were compared between "survivor" and "non-survivor" groups.
202 patients with a mean age of 79 (interquartile range, IQR: 11) years were included, and 51% (n = 103) were female. The overall mortality was 41% (n = 83). SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II scores were significantly higher in the non-survivor group (p < 0.001), and higher scores were correlated with higher mortality. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) - area under curve (AUC) values were 0.802, 0.784, 0.735, 0.702 and 0.780 for SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II, respectively. All prognostic scoring models had a significant discriminative ability on the prediction of mortality among critically ill elderly sepsis patients (p < 0.001).
This study showed that SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II scores are significantly associated with 28-day mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients, and can be successfully used for predicting mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1972-2680</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2036-6590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1972-2680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3855/jidc.18526</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38377099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Journal of Infection in Developing Countries</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; APACHE ; Critical Illness ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Mortality ; Older people ; Organ Dysfunction Scores ; Physiology ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - diagnosis ; Simplified Acute Physiology Score</subject><ispartof>Journal of infection in developing countries, 2024-01, Vol.18 (1), p.122-130</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 2024 Bilal Tekin, Jehat Kiliç, Gürhan Taşkin, İhsan Solmaz, Onur Tezel, Bilgin Bahadır Başgöz.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3737-9387 ; 0000-0002-5795-533X ; 0000-0002-6624-8063 ; 0000-0002-3337-2965</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3131767733?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38377099$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tekin, Bilal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiliç, Jehat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taşkin, Gürhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solmaz, İhsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tezel, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Başgöz, Bilgin Bahadır</creatorcontrib><title>The Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients</title><title>Journal of infection in developing countries</title><addtitle>J Infect Dev Ctries</addtitle><description>The elderly population is unique and the prognostic scoring systems developed for the adult population need to be validated. We evaluated the predictive value of frequently used scoring systems on mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients.
In this single-center, observational, prospective study, critically ill elderly sepsis patients were evaluated. Sequential organ failure evaluation score (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score-II (APACHE-II), logistic organ dysfunction score (LODS), multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), and simplified acute physiology score-II (SAPS-II) were calculated. The participants were followed up for 28 days for in-hospital mortality. Prognostic scoring systems, demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and baseline laboratory findings were compared between "survivor" and "non-survivor" groups.
202 patients with a mean age of 79 (interquartile range, IQR: 11) years were included, and 51% (n = 103) were female. The overall mortality was 41% (n = 83). SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II scores were significantly higher in the non-survivor group (p < 0.001), and higher scores were correlated with higher mortality. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) - area under curve (AUC) values were 0.802, 0.784, 0.735, 0.702 and 0.780 for SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II, respectively. All prognostic scoring models had a significant discriminative ability on the prediction of mortality among critically ill elderly sepsis patients (p < 0.001).
This study showed that SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II scores are significantly associated with 28-day mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients, and can be successfully used for predicting mortality.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>APACHE</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Organ Dysfunction Scores</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Simplified Acute Physiology Score</subject><issn>1972-2680</issn><issn>2036-6590</issn><issn>1972-2680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLxDAUhYMojq-NP0ACbkSmmjRNk7gr42tgZAZmXJe0STVDX-a2i_n3dsYH4ubeA_fjcDkHoXNKbpjk_HbtTH5DJQ_jPXRElQiDMJZk_48eoWOANSFcMU4P0YhJJgRR6gj1q3eLJ03Vau-gqXFTYMgb7-o3DBvobAV3eDl_TMY4WSST54dgOh3j2fx-OcYvu6lrg5fJYjkcsKtx7l3ncl2WG-zKEtvSWD9osC04wK3unK07OEUHhS7Bnn3vE_T6-LCaPAez-dN0ksyCPBRRF0hKZGZZwYwgsSiygtMok1RKo0kspaJFprM4U9pwYUwkSBhGRqiIZ7liJmLsBF19-ba--egtdGnlILdlqWvb9JCGKlQ8IpKoAb38h66b3tfDdymjjIpYCLY1vP6ict8AeFukrXeV9puUknRbRrotI92VMcAX35Z9Vlnzi_6kzz4BGP2Bhg</recordid><startdate>20240131</startdate><enddate>20240131</enddate><creator>Tekin, Bilal</creator><creator>Kiliç, Jehat</creator><creator>Taşkin, Gürhan</creator><creator>Solmaz, İhsan</creator><creator>Tezel, Onur</creator><creator>Başgöz, Bilgin Bahadır</creator><general>Journal of Infection in Developing Countries</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3737-9387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5795-533X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-8063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-2965</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240131</creationdate><title>The Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients</title><author>Tekin, Bilal ; Kiliç, Jehat ; Taşkin, Gürhan ; Solmaz, İhsan ; Tezel, Onur ; Başgöz, Bilgin Bahadır</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-8108be3f3d7067fbf514b8188da068891fbab6b9ad57dd470224d7945bc93d433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>APACHE</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Organ Dysfunction Scores</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Simplified Acute Physiology Score</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tekin, Bilal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiliç, Jehat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taşkin, Gürhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solmaz, İhsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tezel, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Başgöz, Bilgin Bahadır</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of infection in developing countries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tekin, Bilal</au><au>Kiliç, Jehat</au><au>Taşkin, Gürhan</au><au>Solmaz, İhsan</au><au>Tezel, Onur</au><au>Başgöz, Bilgin Bahadır</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of infection in developing countries</jtitle><addtitle>J Infect Dev Ctries</addtitle><date>2024-01-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>122-130</pages><issn>1972-2680</issn><issn>2036-6590</issn><eissn>1972-2680</eissn><abstract>The elderly population is unique and the prognostic scoring systems developed for the adult population need to be validated. We evaluated the predictive value of frequently used scoring systems on mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients.
In this single-center, observational, prospective study, critically ill elderly sepsis patients were evaluated. Sequential organ failure evaluation score (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score-II (APACHE-II), logistic organ dysfunction score (LODS), multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), and simplified acute physiology score-II (SAPS-II) were calculated. The participants were followed up for 28 days for in-hospital mortality. Prognostic scoring systems, demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and baseline laboratory findings were compared between "survivor" and "non-survivor" groups.
202 patients with a mean age of 79 (interquartile range, IQR: 11) years were included, and 51% (n = 103) were female. The overall mortality was 41% (n = 83). SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II scores were significantly higher in the non-survivor group (p < 0.001), and higher scores were correlated with higher mortality. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) - area under curve (AUC) values were 0.802, 0.784, 0.735, 0.702 and 0.780 for SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II, respectively. All prognostic scoring models had a significant discriminative ability on the prediction of mortality among critically ill elderly sepsis patients (p < 0.001).
This study showed that SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II scores are significantly associated with 28-day mortality in critically ill elderly sepsis patients, and can be successfully used for predicting mortality.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Journal of Infection in Developing Countries</pub><pmid>38377099</pmid><doi>10.3855/jidc.18526</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3737-9387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5795-533X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-8063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-2965</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1972-2680 |
ispartof | Journal of infection in developing countries, 2024-01, Vol.18 (1), p.122-130 |
issn | 1972-2680 2036-6590 1972-2680 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929540809 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Adult Aged APACHE Critical Illness Female Humans Intensive Care Units Male Mortality Older people Organ Dysfunction Scores Physiology Prognosis Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies ROC Curve Sepsis Sepsis - diagnosis Simplified Acute Physiology Score |
title | The Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A43%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Comparison%20of%20scoring%20systems:%20SOFA,%20APACHE-II,%20LODS,%20MODS,%20and%20SAPS-II%20in%20critically%20ill%20elderly%20sepsis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20infection%20in%20developing%20countries&rft.au=Tekin,%20Bilal&rft.date=2024-01-31&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=122-130&rft.issn=1972-2680&rft.eissn=1972-2680&rft_id=info:doi/10.3855/jidc.18526&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2929540809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-8108be3f3d7067fbf514b8188da068891fbab6b9ad57dd470224d7945bc93d433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3131767733&rft_id=info:pmid/38377099&rfr_iscdi=true |