Method for Calculating the Bending Stiffness of Honeycomb Paperboard

The article presents continued considerations presented in a prior publication on the development of a model for calculating the bending stiffness of cellular honeycomb paperboards, applying the strength properties of paper raw materials used for the production of paperboard and the geometric parame...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials 2024-02, Vol.17 (4), p.878
Main Authors: Kmita-Fudalej, Gabriela, Kołakowski, Zbigniew, Szewczyk, Włodzimierz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Error analysis
Error reduction
Furniture
Mathematical models
Mechanical properties
Methods
Paper board
Paper products industry
Paperboard
Parameters
Physical properties
Raw materials
Stiffness
Wood composites
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The article presents continued considerations presented in a prior publication on the development of a model for calculating the bending stiffness of cellular honeycomb paperboards, applying the strength properties of paper raw materials used for the production of paperboard and the geometric parameters of cellular board. The results of calculations obtained by using the analytical model presented in the prior publication were significantly overestimated in relation to the value obtained by measurements. The calculation error in relation to the measurement value for the tested group of paperboards in the case of bending stiffness in the machine direction was within the range from 23% to 116%, and the average error was 65%, while in the cross direction it was within the range from 2% to 54%, and the average error was 31%. The calculation model proposed in this work based on the physical properties of cellular paperboard reduces the error values for bending stiffness in both the machine and cross directions. The value of the average error for both main directions in the paperboard plane was 10%. The method enables more accurate determination of in the machine direction and in the cross direction at the paperboard design stage. In order to validate the proposed analytical model, the calculation results were compared with the results of laboratory measurements performed using the four-point bending method and, in order to expand the group of tested paperboards, with the measurement results presented in the prior article for cardboards with different raw material composition and different geometric parameters.
ISSN:1996-1944
1996-1944
DOI:10.3390/ma17040878