Attitudes toward the American Cancer Society’s 2020 cervical cancer screening guidelines: A qualitative study of a national sample of US clinicians

• Published in: Cancer 2024-07, Vol.130 (13), p.2325-2338
• Main Authors: Michel, Alexandra D., Fontenot, Holly B., Fuzzell, Lindsay, Brownstein, Naomi C., Lake, Paige, Vadaparampil, Susan T., Perkins, Rebecca B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Age; American Cancer Society; Attitude of Health Personnel; Attitudes; Cancer; cancer prevention; Cancer screening; Cervical cancer; cervical cancer screening; clinical practice guidelines; Cytology; Early Detection of Cancer - psychology; Female; Guidelines; Gynecology; Health care; Human papillomavirus; human papillomavirus (HPV); Humans; Insurance; Male; Mass Screening; Medical screening; Middle Aged; Obstetrics; Organizations; Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians; primary HPV testing; Professional associations; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative Research; United States; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
• ISSN: 0008-543X; 1097-0142; 1097-0142
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35269

Background The 2020 American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for cervical cancer screening. These guidelines propose two major changes from current practice: initiating screening at age 25 years and using primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. Adoption of guidelines often occurs slowly, and therefore understanding clinician attitudes is important to facilitate practice change. Methods Interviews with a national sample of clinicians who perform cervical cancer screening in a variety of settings explored attitudes toward the two major changes from the 2020 ACS cervical cancer screening guidelines. Clinicians participated in 30‐ to 60‐min interviews exploring their attitudes toward various aspects of cervical cancer screening. Qualitative analysis was performed. Results Seventy clinicians participated from across the United States. Few respondents were initiating screening at age 25 years, and none were using primary HPV testing. However, over half would be willing to adopt these practices if supported by scientific evidence and recommended by professional medical organizations. Barriers to adoption included the lack of endorsement by professional societies, lack of laboratory availability and insurance coverage, limited autonomy within large health care systems, and concerns related to missed disease. Conclusions Few clinicians have adopted screening initiation or primary HPV testing, as recommended by the 2020 ACS guidelines, but over half were open to adopting these changes. Implementation may be facilitated via professional organization endorsement, clinician education, and laboratory, health care system, and insurance support. Plain Language Summary In 2020, the American Cancer Society (ACS) released updated guidelines for cervical cancer screening. The main changes to current practices were to initiate screening at age 25 years instead of age 21 years and to screen using primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing rather than cytology alone or in combination with HPV testing. We performed in‐depth interviews with 70 obstetrics and gynecology, family medicine, and internal medicine physicians and advanced practice providers about their attitudes toward these guidelines. Few clinicians are following the 2020 ACS guidelines, but over half were open to changing practice if the changes were supported by evidence and recommended by professional medical organizations. Barriers to adoption included the lack of endorse