Loading…

3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials

Aim 3Mixtatin (a combination of Metronidazole, Minocycline, and Ciprofloxacin along with statins) is a novel biomaterial in pulp therapy, while Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is considered the gold standard in endodontics. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evidence-based dentistry 2024-06, Vol.25 (2), p.111-112
Main Authors: Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat, Firoozi, Parsa, Basir Shabestari, Samira, Maleki, Azam, Nazemi Salman, Bahareh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-fa90752d58b7c36d47c7a345f7800647715ba16ecbe2521f298049d4f189e7d73
container_end_page 112
container_issue 2
container_start_page 111
container_title Evidence-based dentistry
container_volume 25
creator Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat
Firoozi, Parsa
Basir Shabestari, Samira
Maleki, Azam
Nazemi Salman, Bahareh
description Aim 3Mixtatin (a combination of Metronidazole, Minocycline, and Ciprofloxacin along with statins) is a novel biomaterial in pulp therapy, while Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is considered the gold standard in endodontics. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of MTA and 3Mixtatin in pulp therapy of primary teeth. Methods and materials MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest databases, and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pulp therapy with 3Mixtatin and MTA in primary teeth, published up to February 2023. It should be noted that the protocol was previously registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42021243626). RCTs were assessed independently by two researchers in terms of eligibility and quality. Data extracted and tabulated. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The effect sizes were evaluated utilizing risk ratios (RRs). The heterogeneity investigation was conducted utilizing I² measurement at α = 0.10. Results Out of 86 retrieval records, four articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on clinical and radiographic outcomes, the application of 3Mixtatin in the pulp therapy of primary teeth was as successful as MTA in 12 months (Clinical RR = 1.087 | Radiographic RR = 2.132). The RoB-2 tool showed a low risk of bias in all included RCTs. Conclusion The limited evidence showed the clinical and radiographic efficacy of 3Mixtatin as a potential alternative to MTA. Further empirical research with larger sample sizes and strict methodology will be essential to substantiate this assertion.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41432-024-00987-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2942185791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2942185791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-fa90752d58b7c36d47c7a345f7800647715ba16ecbe2521f298049d4f189e7d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOHDEQRa0IFB7JD7BAlthk0-Bn250dQkmIBGIDa8vjrg6N-hWXe2CyzofHw0xAYsGqyrrnllV1CTni7JQzac9QcSVFwYQqGKusKewHss-VKQutVLmz7sssM1XtkQPEB8aYMUx_JHvSKmW14fvkr7xun5JP7UCXEHFGen17TvNrmruJpnuIflrRsaFTbHsfVzQBpPuv1FNcYYI-OwONsGzhkfqhpj0kX_jBdytsce0Lc4wwJBqzOvbtH6hpGIcUx67LbYqt7_AT2W1ygc_bekjuvn-7vbgsrm5-_Lw4vyqCFGUqGl8xo0Wt7cIEWdbKBOOl0o2xjJXKGK4XnpcQFiC04I2obN69Vg23FZjayEPyZTN3iuPvGTC5vsUAXecHGGd0olKC57tUPKMnb9CHcY55L3SSGamUZqbKlNhQIY6IERq3PZPjzK0zcpuMXM7IPWfkbDYdb0fPix7qF8v_UDIgNwBmafgF8fXvd8b-A1-AnWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3073445079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials</title><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat ; Firoozi, Parsa ; Basir Shabestari, Samira ; Maleki, Azam ; Nazemi Salman, Bahareh</creator><creatorcontrib>Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat ; Firoozi, Parsa ; Basir Shabestari, Samira ; Maleki, Azam ; Nazemi Salman, Bahareh</creatorcontrib><description>Aim 3Mixtatin (a combination of Metronidazole, Minocycline, and Ciprofloxacin along with statins) is a novel biomaterial in pulp therapy, while Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is considered the gold standard in endodontics. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of MTA and 3Mixtatin in pulp therapy of primary teeth. Methods and materials MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest databases, and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pulp therapy with 3Mixtatin and MTA in primary teeth, published up to February 2023. It should be noted that the protocol was previously registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42021243626). RCTs were assessed independently by two researchers in terms of eligibility and quality. Data extracted and tabulated. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The effect sizes were evaluated utilizing risk ratios (RRs). The heterogeneity investigation was conducted utilizing I² measurement at α = 0.10. Results Out of 86 retrieval records, four articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on clinical and radiographic outcomes, the application of 3Mixtatin in the pulp therapy of primary teeth was as successful as MTA in 12 months (Clinical RR = 1.087 | Radiographic RR = 2.132). The RoB-2 tool showed a low risk of bias in all included RCTs. Conclusion The limited evidence showed the clinical and radiographic efficacy of 3Mixtatin as a potential alternative to MTA. Further empirical research with larger sample sizes and strict methodology will be essential to substantiate this assertion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-0049</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1476-5446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-00987-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38448571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/700/3032/3123 ; 692/700/3032/3148 ; Biomaterials ; Ciprofloxacin ; Clinical trials ; Dental pulp ; Dentistry ; Medicine ; Meta-analysis ; Metronidazole ; Minocycline ; Reviews ; Statins ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Evidence-based dentistry, 2024-06, Vol.25 (2), p.111-112</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to British Dental Association 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to British Dental Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-fa90752d58b7c36d47c7a345f7800647715ba16ecbe2521f298049d4f189e7d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5595-1485</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38448571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firoozi, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basir Shabestari, Samira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maleki, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazemi Salman, Bahareh</creatorcontrib><title>3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials</title><title>Evidence-based dentistry</title><addtitle>Evid Based Dent</addtitle><addtitle>Evid Based Dent</addtitle><description>Aim 3Mixtatin (a combination of Metronidazole, Minocycline, and Ciprofloxacin along with statins) is a novel biomaterial in pulp therapy, while Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is considered the gold standard in endodontics. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of MTA and 3Mixtatin in pulp therapy of primary teeth. Methods and materials MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest databases, and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pulp therapy with 3Mixtatin and MTA in primary teeth, published up to February 2023. It should be noted that the protocol was previously registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42021243626). RCTs were assessed independently by two researchers in terms of eligibility and quality. Data extracted and tabulated. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The effect sizes were evaluated utilizing risk ratios (RRs). The heterogeneity investigation was conducted utilizing I² measurement at α = 0.10. Results Out of 86 retrieval records, four articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on clinical and radiographic outcomes, the application of 3Mixtatin in the pulp therapy of primary teeth was as successful as MTA in 12 months (Clinical RR = 1.087 | Radiographic RR = 2.132). The RoB-2 tool showed a low risk of bias in all included RCTs. Conclusion The limited evidence showed the clinical and radiographic efficacy of 3Mixtatin as a potential alternative to MTA. Further empirical research with larger sample sizes and strict methodology will be essential to substantiate this assertion.</description><subject>692/700/3032/3123</subject><subject>692/700/3032/3148</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dental pulp</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Metronidazole</subject><subject>Minocycline</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Statins</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>1462-0049</issn><issn>1476-5446</issn><issn>1476-5446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOHDEQRa0IFB7JD7BAlthk0-Bn250dQkmIBGIDa8vjrg6N-hWXe2CyzofHw0xAYsGqyrrnllV1CTni7JQzac9QcSVFwYQqGKusKewHss-VKQutVLmz7sssM1XtkQPEB8aYMUx_JHvSKmW14fvkr7xun5JP7UCXEHFGen17TvNrmruJpnuIflrRsaFTbHsfVzQBpPuv1FNcYYI-OwONsGzhkfqhpj0kX_jBdytsce0Lc4wwJBqzOvbtH6hpGIcUx67LbYqt7_AT2W1ygc_bekjuvn-7vbgsrm5-_Lw4vyqCFGUqGl8xo0Wt7cIEWdbKBOOl0o2xjJXKGK4XnpcQFiC04I2obN69Vg23FZjayEPyZTN3iuPvGTC5vsUAXecHGGd0olKC57tUPKMnb9CHcY55L3SSGamUZqbKlNhQIY6IERq3PZPjzK0zcpuMXM7IPWfkbDYdb0fPix7qF8v_UDIgNwBmafgF8fXvd8b-A1-AnWg</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat</creator><creator>Firoozi, Parsa</creator><creator>Basir Shabestari, Samira</creator><creator>Maleki, Azam</creator><creator>Nazemi Salman, Bahareh</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5595-1485</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials</title><author>Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat ; Firoozi, Parsa ; Basir Shabestari, Samira ; Maleki, Azam ; Nazemi Salman, Bahareh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-fa90752d58b7c36d47c7a345f7800647715ba16ecbe2521f298049d4f189e7d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>692/700/3032/3123</topic><topic>692/700/3032/3148</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dental pulp</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Metronidazole</topic><topic>Minocycline</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Statins</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firoozi, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basir Shabestari, Samira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maleki, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazemi Salman, Bahareh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evidence-based dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zarabadi, Mobina Sadat</au><au>Firoozi, Parsa</au><au>Basir Shabestari, Samira</au><au>Maleki, Azam</au><au>Nazemi Salman, Bahareh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Evidence-based dentistry</jtitle><stitle>Evid Based Dent</stitle><addtitle>Evid Based Dent</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>111-112</pages><issn>1462-0049</issn><issn>1476-5446</issn><eissn>1476-5446</eissn><abstract>Aim 3Mixtatin (a combination of Metronidazole, Minocycline, and Ciprofloxacin along with statins) is a novel biomaterial in pulp therapy, while Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is considered the gold standard in endodontics. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of MTA and 3Mixtatin in pulp therapy of primary teeth. Methods and materials MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest databases, and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pulp therapy with 3Mixtatin and MTA in primary teeth, published up to February 2023. It should be noted that the protocol was previously registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42021243626). RCTs were assessed independently by two researchers in terms of eligibility and quality. Data extracted and tabulated. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The effect sizes were evaluated utilizing risk ratios (RRs). The heterogeneity investigation was conducted utilizing I² measurement at α = 0.10. Results Out of 86 retrieval records, four articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on clinical and radiographic outcomes, the application of 3Mixtatin in the pulp therapy of primary teeth was as successful as MTA in 12 months (Clinical RR = 1.087 | Radiographic RR = 2.132). The RoB-2 tool showed a low risk of bias in all included RCTs. Conclusion The limited evidence showed the clinical and radiographic efficacy of 3Mixtatin as a potential alternative to MTA. Further empirical research with larger sample sizes and strict methodology will be essential to substantiate this assertion.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38448571</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41432-024-00987-8</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5595-1485</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-0049
ispartof Evidence-based dentistry, 2024-06, Vol.25 (2), p.111-112
issn 1462-0049
1476-5446
1476-5446
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2942185791
source Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List
subjects 692/700/3032/3123
692/700/3032/3148
Biomaterials
Ciprofloxacin
Clinical trials
Dental pulp
Dentistry
Medicine
Meta-analysis
Metronidazole
Minocycline
Reviews
Statins
Teeth
title 3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A47%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3Mixtatin%20versus%20MTA%20in%20pulp%20therapy%20of%20primary%20teeth:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20current%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Evidence-based%20dentistry&rft.au=Zarabadi,%20Mobina%20Sadat&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=111-112&rft.issn=1462-0049&rft.eissn=1476-5446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41432-024-00987-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2942185791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-fa90752d58b7c36d47c7a345f7800647715ba16ecbe2521f298049d4f189e7d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3073445079&rft_id=info:pmid/38448571&rfr_iscdi=true