Effect of Oral Prednisone on the Prevention and Management of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy After Open-Globe Injury

• Published in: Journal of vitreoretinal diseases (Print) 2024-03, Vol.8 (2), p.168-172
• Main Authors: Yao, Tianyuan, Chauhan, Muhammad Z., Uwaydat, Sami H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 2474-1264; 2474-1272
• DOI: 10.1177/24741264241229262

Purpose: To determine the impact of oral prednisone on the final visual acuity (VA) and prevention of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in patients having pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for globe injuries. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all globe injuries with an initial repair and subsequent PPV between 2009 and 2018. Data included the initial VA, zones of injury, initial closure date, time to secondary intervention (PPV), oral prednisone (1 mg/kg/day) use, the final VA, and enucleation rate. Multivariable regression models were used to assess the impact of oral prednisone use on anatomic and functional outcomes. Results: The mean (±SD) patient age was 46.25 ±18.56 years (range, 13-92); 131 (83.9%) were men. Oral prednisone intake was recorded in 81 patients (52.3%). The prednisone group had significantly more zone 3 involvement (P = .001), worse initial VA (2.28 vs 1.92 logMAR; P = .003), and a greater mean number of surgeries (P = .020) than the no-steroids (control) group but an equivalent final logMAR VA (1.57 vs 1.52; P = .881). The prednisone group had significant VA improvement (P = .025); however, oral prednisone use did not predict the development of PVR (29.23% vs 12.90%; odds ratio [OR], 2.81; 95% CI, 0.89-8.85) or retinal detachment (27.27% vs 29.58%; OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.23-1.56). Conclusions: Despite a worse initial clinical presentation, patients who received oral prednisone had significant visual improvement compared with the control group. However, oral prednisone (1 mg/kg/day) use at the time of injury did not decrease the PVR rate.