Urinary mutagenicity and bladder cancer risk in northern New England

• Published in: Environmental and molecular mutagenesis 2024-01, Vol.65 (1-2), p.47-54
• Main Authors: Wong, Jason Y. Y., Fischer, Alexander H., Baris, Dalsu, Beane Freeman, Laura E., Karagas, Margaret R., Schwenn, Molly, Johnson, Alison, Matthews, Peggy P., Swank, Adam E., Hosain, G. Monawar, Koutros, Stella, Silverman, Debra T., DeMarini, David M., Rothman, Nathaniel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aetiology; Biomarkers; Bladder; Bladder cancer; Cancer; Carcinogenesis; Carcinogens; Case-Control Studies; Confidence intervals; DNA damage; Environmental risk; Exposure; Genotoxic chemicals; Genotoxicity; Health risks; Humans; Mutagenicity; Mutagenicity Tests; Mutagens - toxicity; New England - epidemiology; Occupational exposure; Occupational hazards; Population studies; Regression analysis; Risk; Smoking; Statistical analysis; Tobacco; Urinary Bladder; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - chemically induced; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics; Urine
• ISSN: 0893-6692; 1098-2280
• DOI: 10.1002/em.22588

The etiology of bladder cancer among never smokers without occupational or environmental exposure to established urothelial carcinogens remains unclear. Urinary mutagenicity is an integrative measure that reflects recent exposure to genotoxic agents. Here, we investigated its potential association with bladder cancer in rural northern New England. We analyzed 156 bladder cancer cases and 247 cancer‐free controls from a large population‐based case–control study conducted in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Overnight urine samples were deconjugated enzymatically and the extracted organics were assessed for mutagenicity using the plate‐incorporation Ames assay with the Salmonella frameshift strain YG1041 + S9. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of bladder cancer in relation to having mutagenic versus nonmutagenic urine, adjusted for age, sex, and state, and stratified by smoking status (never, former, and current). We found evidence for an association between having mutagenic urine and increased bladder cancer risk among never smokers (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.3–11.2) but not among former or current smokers. Risk could not be estimated among current smokers because nearly all cases and controls had mutagenic urine. Urinary mutagenicity among never‐smoking controls could not be explained by recent exposure to established occupational and environmental mutagenic bladder carcinogens evaluated in our study. Our findings suggest that among never smokers, urinary mutagenicity potentially reflects genotoxic exposure profiles relevant to bladder carcinogenesis. Future studies are needed to replicate our findings and identify compounds and their sources that influence bladder cancer risk.