Short-term retention of words as a function of encoding depth

• Published in: Memory & cognition 2024-08, Vol.52 (6), p.1338-1356
• Main Authors: Lawrence, Cayden O., Guitard, Dominic, Cowan, Nelson
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive Psychology; Encoding (Cognitive process); Female; Humans; Immediate recall; Information processing; Learning; Male; Memory; Memory, Short-Term - physiology; Mental Recall - physiology; Phonology; Psychology; Retention; Retention, Psychology - physiology; Time; Time Factors; Verbal learning; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0090-502X; 1532-5946; 1532-5946
• DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01546-3

The traditional short- and long-term storage view of information processing and the levels-of-processing view both discuss the forgetting of information over time. In the traditional stage view, there is loss of at least poorly encoded information across several seconds when the information cannot be rehearsed (e.g., Ricker et al., 2020 , Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 60–76). In the levels-of-processing approach, information that is encoded in a shallow manner is lost more quickly over time than deeply-encoded information (Craik & Lockhart, 1972 , Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11 , 671–684.). Previous studies of the depth of encoding, however, have mostly been conducted using delayed tests, so there are few studies directly comparing the rate of forgetting over time for information as a function of different depths of encoding. We manipulated the level of processing with immediate recall in a modified Brown–Peterson task. An effect of the level of processing was robust, but evidence of forgetting across retention intervals was not always observed. When encoding time was curtailed (in Experiments 3 and 4), we found main effects of both the level of processing and the retention interval, but no interaction between the two variables. The results suggest that the depth-of-encoding effect may occur during the initial encoding of items, but without differential forgetting within the range of retention intervals that we examined (0–18 s), in contrast to the suggestion by Craik and Lockhart. Further work is needed to determine whether the depth-of-processing effect would grow over longer intervals.