Differential Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis and Charcot Neuropathic Osteoarthropathy with Deep Learning Methods

• Published in: Journal of digital imaging 2024-10, Vol.37 (5), p.2454-2465
• Main Authors: Cakir, Maide, Tulum, Gökalp, Cuce, Ferhat, Yilmaz, Kerim Bora, Aralasmak, Ayse, Isik, Muhammet İkbal, Canbolat, Hüseyin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Arthropathy, Neurogenic - diagnosis; Arthropathy, Neurogenic - diagnostic imaging; Bone marrow; Classification; Deep Learning; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic Foot - diagnosis; Diabetic Foot - diagnostic imaging; Diagnosis, Differential; Differential diagnosis; Female; Foot diseases; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Image processing; Image segmentation; Joint diseases; Machine learning; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Medical imaging; Middle Aged; Osteomyelitis; Osteomyelitis - diagnosis; Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity
• ISSN: 2948-2933; 0897-1889; 2948-2925; 2948-2933; 1618-727X
• DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01067-0

Our study aims to evaluate the potential of a deep learning (DL) algorithm for differentiating the signal intensity of bone marrow between osteomyelitis (OM), Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy (CNO), and trauma (TR). The local ethics committee approved this retrospective study. From 148 patients, segmentation resulted in 679 labeled regions for T1-weighted images (comprising 151 CNO, 257 OM, and 271 TR) and 714 labeled regions for T2-weighted images (consisting of 160 CNO, 272 OM, and 282 TR). We employed both multi-class classification (MCC) and binary-class classification (BCC) approaches to compare the classification outcomes of CNO, TR, and OM. The ResNet-50 and the EfficientNet-b0 accuracy values were computed at 96.2% and 97.1%, respectively, for T1-weighted images. Additionally, accuracy values for ResNet-50 and the EfficientNet-b0 were determined at 95.6% and 96.8%, respectively, for T2-weighted images. Also, according to BCC for CNO, OM, and TR, the sensitivity of ResNet-50 is 91.1%, 92.4%, and 96.6% and the sensitivity of EfficientNet-b0 is 93.2%, 97.6%, and 98.1% for T1, respectively. For CNO, OM, and TR, the sensitivity of ResNet-50 is 94.9%, 83.6%, and 97.9% and the sensitivity of EfficientNet-b0 is 95.6%, 85.2%, and 98.6% for T2, respectively. The specificity values of ResNet-50 for CNO, OM, and TR in T1-weighted images are 98.1%, 97.9%, and 94.7% and 98.6%, 97.5%, and 96.7% in T2-weighted images respectively. Similarly, for EfficientNet-b0, the specificity values are 98.9%, 98.7%, and 98.4% and 99.1%, 98.5%, and 98.7% for T1-weighted and T2-weighted images respectively. In the diabetic foot, deep learning methods serve as a non-invasive tool to differentiate CNO, OM, and TR with high accuracy.