Characterization of elemental and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compositions of urban air in Brisbane

• Published in: Atmospheric environment (1994) 2005, Vol.39 (3), p.463-476
• Main Authors: Lim, McKenzie C.H., Ayoko, Godwin A., Morawska, Lidia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Atmospheric pollution; Elements; Exact sciences and technology; Multivariate data analyses; Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution; Pollution; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Urban air pollution
• ISSN: 1352-2310; 1873-2844
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.050

Characterization of the elemental and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) compositions of urban air was undertaken at three major sites in Brisbane, Australia. 17 elements and 16 US EPA priority PAHs were quantified at the sites. The most commonly detected elements in the TSP and PM 2.5 fractions were Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Si, Sn, Sr and Zn. Compared to the two other sites, PM 2.5 was found to contain higher concentrations of Zr, Mo, V, Al, Mn and Sr at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) site. In contrast, the Woolloongabba sampling site, which was highly influenced by the vehicular emission and local industrial activities, has higher concentrations of Co, Sn, Cu, Zn and Mg while ANZ site has significantly lower concentration levels of most elements than the other sites; possibly due to the shielding effect of the nearby bush and forest. NAP, PHE, ANT, FLT, PYR and CRY were the most widespread PAHs found in all sites. But only QUT and Woolloongabba bus platform sites had detectable levels of the most carcinogenic US EPA PAH, BAP. The multi-criteria decision making procedures, Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) and Geometrical Analysis for Interactive Aid (GAIA) were used to rank the air samples and to identify the sources of the pollutants. Thus Woolloongabba bus platform was ranked as the most polluted site on the basis of the elemental and PAH compositions of its air samples while Woolloongabba bus platform and QUT sites were ranked as the worst polluted sites in terms of PAHs and PM 2.5 elemental contents, respectively.