Loading…

Spark Plasma Sintering of LiTi2(PO4)3-Based Solid Electrolytes

Solid electrolytes, LiTi2(PO4)3 (LTP), Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP), and Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)2.9(VO4)0.1 (LATPV), were prepared by conventional sintering (CS) and spark plasma sintering (SPS) methods, and the Li+ ion conductivity of the sintered pellets was examined using an impedance analyzer. SPS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Ceramic Society 2005-07, Vol.88 (7), p.1803-1807
Main Authors: Chang, Chae-Myung, Lee, Young Il, Hong, Seong-Hyeon, Park, Hyun-Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Solid electrolytes, LiTi2(PO4)3 (LTP), Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP), and Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)2.9(VO4)0.1 (LATPV), were prepared by conventional sintering (CS) and spark plasma sintering (SPS) methods, and the Li+ ion conductivity of the sintered pellets was examined using an impedance analyzer. SPS remarkably improved the densification compared to CS and resulted in dense ceramics (95–97% of theoretical density) irrespective of the substituted ions. The highest conductivity of 2.6 × 10−4 S/cm was found for the LATPV specimen sintered by spark plasma at 1100°C. LATP and LATPV exhibited an order of magnitude higher ionic conductivity than LTP in the specimens of similar densities. The results demonstrated that the enhanced conductivity in substituted LTP is not due to the enhanced densification alone. The other possible explanations are discussed in terms of bottleneck size, lithium content, and grain boundary characteristics.
ISSN:0002-7820
1551-2916
DOI:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00246.x