A scoping review of decision‐making tools to support substitute decision‐makers for adults with impaired capacity

• Published in: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2024-07, Vol.72 (7), p.2219-2231
• Main Authors: King, Seema, Fernandes, Brooklynn, Jayme, Timothy S., Boryski, Gwenn, Gaetano, Daniel, Premji, Zahra, Venturato, Lorraine, Santana, Maria J., Simon, Jessica, Holroyd‐Leduc, Jayna
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Caregivers; decision aids; Decision making; Dementia; Dementia disorders; Geriatrics; Meta-analysis; Older people; substitute decision‐making
• ISSN: 0002-8614; 1532-5415; 1532-5415
• DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18812

Background Substitute decision‐makers (SDMs) make decisions that honor medical, personal, and end‐of‐life wishes for older adults who have lost capacity, including those with dementia. However, SDMs often lack support, information, and problem‐solving tools required to make decisions and can suffer with negative emotional, relationship, and financial impacts. The need for adaptable supports has been identified in prior meta‐analyses. This scoping review identifies evidence‐based decision‐making resources/tools for SDMs, outlines domains of support, and determines resource/tool effectiveness and/or efficacy. Methods The scoping review used the search strategy: Population—SDMs for older adults who have lost decision‐making capacity; Concept—supports, resources, tools, and interventions; Context—any context where a decision is made on behalf of an adult (>25 years). Databases included MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and s in Social Gerontology and SocIndex. Tools were scored by members on the research team, including patient partners, based on domains of need previously identified in prior meta‐analyses. Results Two reviewers independently screened 5279 citations. Articles included studies that evaluated a resource/tool that helped a family/friend/caregiver SDMs outside of an ICU setting. 828 articles proceeded onto full‐text screening, and 25 articles were included for data extraction. The seventeen tools identified focused on different time points/decisions in the dementia trajectory, and no single tool encompassed all the domains of caregiver decision‐making needs. Conclusion Existing tools may not comprehensively support caregiver needs. However, combining tools into a toolkit and considering their application relevant to the caregiver's journey may start to address the gap in current supports.