Loading…
What should the optimal access site be for percutaneous treatment of anterior lower pole calyx stones?
Objectives Compared to other stone groups, anterior calyx stones are more challenging for endourologists to treat. This study aims to evaluate the differences between our latest technique and conventional techniques for treating anterior calyx stones in the lower pole. Materials and methods Patients...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of urology 2024-03, Vol.42 (1), p.176, Article 176 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c44f34949be4383dd73053b7f6dd88f420626c7f56608dc515bbfa6013a4e2e43 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | World journal of urology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Kucukyangoz, Mustafa Gucuk, Adnan |
description | Objectives
Compared to other stone groups, anterior calyx stones are more challenging for endourologists to treat. This study aims to evaluate the differences between our latest technique and conventional techniques for treating anterior calyx stones in the lower pole.
Materials and methods
Patients with isolated anterior lower pole calyx or complex lower pole stones with anterior calyx branching were included in the study. The first group included lower pole access, while the second group included percutaneous treatment through the middle or upper pole. In the first group, the posterior calyx or direct anterior calyx approach was utilised depending on whether the stone was isolated calyx, complex structure or calyx anatomy, while in the second group, percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed through the middle or upper pole posterior calyx access.
Results
There were 37 patients in Group 1 and 25 patients in Group 2. Both groups were similar regarding patient age, sex, stone burden, and stone localisation (
p
> 0.05). When comparing operative and post-operative data between groups, it was found that the stone clearance rate, number of accesses, and haematocrit decrease were statistically superior in the second group (
p
: 0.003,
p
: 0.002,
p
: 0.018), with no significant difference in mean operative time, length of hospital stay, fluoroscopy time and pain score (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
Percutaneous surgery utilising an access from a calyx distal to the stone may offer better clearance and lower morbidity rates for lower pole stones involving the anterior calyx. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00345-024-04846-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2973101257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2973101257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c44f34949be4383dd73053b7f6dd88f420626c7f56608dc515bbfa6013a4e2e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxS1UxC4LX6AHZKmXXgLjP7Gzp6pCLSCtxIWqR8txxt1F2XixHVG-PYbQgjhw8kj-vTej9wj5zOCUAeizBCBkXQGXFchGqgr2yJxJIapGc_XpzTwjhyndAjCtoD4gM9HUoEEt58T_XttM0zqMfUfzGmnY5c3W9tQ6hynRtMlIW6Q-RLrD6MZsBwxjojmizVscMg2e2iFj3BSkD_dYwNAjdbZ_-EtTDgOmb0dk39s-4fHLuyC_fv64Ob-sVtcXV-ffV5UTXOXKSemFXMpli1I0ouu0gFq02quuaxovOSiunPa1UtB0rmZ123qrgAkrkRfNgnydfHcx3I2YstluksO-n642fKkFA8ZrXdAv79DbMMahXPdEgdIlraZQfKJcDClF9GYXSz7xwTAwTy2YqQVTWjDPLRgoopMX67HdYvdf8i_2AogJSOVr-IPxdfcHto-qopJZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2970670178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What should the optimal access site be for percutaneous treatment of anterior lower pole calyx stones?</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Kucukyangoz, Mustafa ; Gucuk, Adnan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kucukyangoz, Mustafa ; Gucuk, Adnan</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Compared to other stone groups, anterior calyx stones are more challenging for endourologists to treat. This study aims to evaluate the differences between our latest technique and conventional techniques for treating anterior calyx stones in the lower pole.
Materials and methods
Patients with isolated anterior lower pole calyx or complex lower pole stones with anterior calyx branching were included in the study. The first group included lower pole access, while the second group included percutaneous treatment through the middle or upper pole. In the first group, the posterior calyx or direct anterior calyx approach was utilised depending on whether the stone was isolated calyx, complex structure or calyx anatomy, while in the second group, percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed through the middle or upper pole posterior calyx access.
Results
There were 37 patients in Group 1 and 25 patients in Group 2. Both groups were similar regarding patient age, sex, stone burden, and stone localisation (
p
> 0.05). When comparing operative and post-operative data between groups, it was found that the stone clearance rate, number of accesses, and haematocrit decrease were statistically superior in the second group (
p
: 0.003,
p
: 0.002,
p
: 0.018), with no significant difference in mean operative time, length of hospital stay, fluoroscopy time and pain score (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
Percutaneous surgery utilising an access from a calyx distal to the stone may offer better clearance and lower morbidity rates for lower pole stones involving the anterior calyx.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04846-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38507069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Fluoroscopy ; Hematocrit ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Kidney Calices - surgery ; Length of Stay ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morbidity ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods ; Nephrology ; Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods ; Oncology ; Operative Time ; Original Article ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Stone ; Treatment Outcome ; Urology</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 2024-03, Vol.42 (1), p.176, Article 176</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c44f34949be4383dd73053b7f6dd88f420626c7f56608dc515bbfa6013a4e2e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4766-7454</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38507069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kucukyangoz, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gucuk, Adnan</creatorcontrib><title>What should the optimal access site be for percutaneous treatment of anterior lower pole calyx stones?</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>Objectives
Compared to other stone groups, anterior calyx stones are more challenging for endourologists to treat. This study aims to evaluate the differences between our latest technique and conventional techniques for treating anterior calyx stones in the lower pole.
Materials and methods
Patients with isolated anterior lower pole calyx or complex lower pole stones with anterior calyx branching were included in the study. The first group included lower pole access, while the second group included percutaneous treatment through the middle or upper pole. In the first group, the posterior calyx or direct anterior calyx approach was utilised depending on whether the stone was isolated calyx, complex structure or calyx anatomy, while in the second group, percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed through the middle or upper pole posterior calyx access.
Results
There were 37 patients in Group 1 and 25 patients in Group 2. Both groups were similar regarding patient age, sex, stone burden, and stone localisation (
p
> 0.05). When comparing operative and post-operative data between groups, it was found that the stone clearance rate, number of accesses, and haematocrit decrease were statistically superior in the second group (
p
: 0.003,
p
: 0.002,
p
: 0.018), with no significant difference in mean operative time, length of hospital stay, fluoroscopy time and pain score (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
Percutaneous surgery utilising an access from a calyx distal to the stone may offer better clearance and lower morbidity rates for lower pole stones involving the anterior calyx.</description><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Hematocrit</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney Calices - surgery</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stone</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxS1UxC4LX6AHZKmXXgLjP7Gzp6pCLSCtxIWqR8txxt1F2XixHVG-PYbQgjhw8kj-vTej9wj5zOCUAeizBCBkXQGXFchGqgr2yJxJIapGc_XpzTwjhyndAjCtoD4gM9HUoEEt58T_XttM0zqMfUfzGmnY5c3W9tQ6hynRtMlIW6Q-RLrD6MZsBwxjojmizVscMg2e2iFj3BSkD_dYwNAjdbZ_-EtTDgOmb0dk39s-4fHLuyC_fv64Ob-sVtcXV-ffV5UTXOXKSemFXMpli1I0ouu0gFq02quuaxovOSiunPa1UtB0rmZ123qrgAkrkRfNgnydfHcx3I2YstluksO-n642fKkFA8ZrXdAv79DbMMahXPdEgdIlraZQfKJcDClF9GYXSz7xwTAwTy2YqQVTWjDPLRgoopMX67HdYvdf8i_2AogJSOVr-IPxdfcHto-qopJZ</recordid><startdate>20240320</startdate><enddate>20240320</enddate><creator>Kucukyangoz, Mustafa</creator><creator>Gucuk, Adnan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-7454</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240320</creationdate><title>What should the optimal access site be for percutaneous treatment of anterior lower pole calyx stones?</title><author>Kucukyangoz, Mustafa ; Gucuk, Adnan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c44f34949be4383dd73053b7f6dd88f420626c7f56608dc515bbfa6013a4e2e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Hematocrit</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney Calices - surgery</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stone</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kucukyangoz, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gucuk, Adnan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kucukyangoz, Mustafa</au><au>Gucuk, Adnan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What should the optimal access site be for percutaneous treatment of anterior lower pole calyx stones?</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><stitle>World J Urol</stitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>2024-03-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>176</spage><pages>176-</pages><artnum>176</artnum><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Compared to other stone groups, anterior calyx stones are more challenging for endourologists to treat. This study aims to evaluate the differences between our latest technique and conventional techniques for treating anterior calyx stones in the lower pole.
Materials and methods
Patients with isolated anterior lower pole calyx or complex lower pole stones with anterior calyx branching were included in the study. The first group included lower pole access, while the second group included percutaneous treatment through the middle or upper pole. In the first group, the posterior calyx or direct anterior calyx approach was utilised depending on whether the stone was isolated calyx, complex structure or calyx anatomy, while in the second group, percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed through the middle or upper pole posterior calyx access.
Results
There were 37 patients in Group 1 and 25 patients in Group 2. Both groups were similar regarding patient age, sex, stone burden, and stone localisation (
p
> 0.05). When comparing operative and post-operative data between groups, it was found that the stone clearance rate, number of accesses, and haematocrit decrease were statistically superior in the second group (
p
: 0.003,
p
: 0.002,
p
: 0.018), with no significant difference in mean operative time, length of hospital stay, fluoroscopy time and pain score (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
Percutaneous surgery utilising an access from a calyx distal to the stone may offer better clearance and lower morbidity rates for lower pole stones involving the anterior calyx.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>38507069</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00345-024-04846-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-7454</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1433-8726 |
ispartof | World journal of urology, 2024-03, Vol.42 (1), p.176, Article 176 |
issn | 1433-8726 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2973101257 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Fluoroscopy Hematocrit Humans Kidney Calculi - surgery Kidney Calices - surgery Length of Stay Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morbidity Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods Nephrology Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods Oncology Operative Time Original Article Patients Retrospective Studies Stone Treatment Outcome Urology |
title | What should the optimal access site be for percutaneous treatment of anterior lower pole calyx stones? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A13%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20should%20the%20optimal%20access%20site%20be%20for%20percutaneous%20treatment%20of%20anterior%20lower%20pole%20calyx%20stones?&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Kucukyangoz,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2024-03-20&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=176&rft.pages=176-&rft.artnum=176&rft.issn=1433-8726&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00345-024-04846-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2973101257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c44f34949be4383dd73053b7f6dd88f420626c7f56608dc515bbfa6013a4e2e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2970670178&rft_id=info:pmid/38507069&rfr_iscdi=true |