Loading…

Potential for the spread of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, and Campylobacter in the lairage environment at abattoirs

Prevalences of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were examined in 270 swabs taken from selected sites along the unloading-to-slaughter routes of animal movement in lairages of six commercial abattoirs, three for cattle and three for sheep. The overall prevalences of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of food protection 2002-06, Vol.65 (6), p.931-936
Main Authors: Small, A, Reid, C A, Avery, S M, Karabasil, N, Crowley, C, Buncic, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2c476cd3c0b5a2a9878ade0cc02d628dfe53311c28f84470fb923a23562630e43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2c476cd3c0b5a2a9878ade0cc02d628dfe53311c28f84470fb923a23562630e43
container_end_page 936
container_issue 6
container_start_page 931
container_title Journal of food protection
container_volume 65
creator Small, A
Reid, C A
Avery, S M
Karabasil, N
Crowley, C
Buncic, S
description Prevalences of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were examined in 270 swabs taken from selected sites along the unloading-to-slaughter routes of animal movement in lairages of six commercial abattoirs, three for cattle and three for sheep. The overall prevalences of the pathogens in the respective lairage environments were compared with those for 270 swabs from the pelts of 90 lambs examined in the present study and 270 swabs from the hides of 90 cattle examined in a previous study that were slaughtered at the same abattoirs on the same days. Also, the results obtained were analyzed with the aim of identifying critical points at which animal-environment-animal transfer of the pathogens in lairages occurs. The results showed that (i) the overall prevalences of E. coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were 27.2, 6.1, and 1.1%, respectively, in cattle lairages and 2.2, 1.1, and 5.6%, respectively, in sheep lairages; (ii) the overall prevalences of the three pathogens on cow hides (28.8, 17.7, and 0%, respectively) and sheep pelts (5.5, 7.8, and 0%, respectively) were higher than the overall prevalences in the respective lairage environments; (iii) the most frequently contaminated sites in cattle lairages were holding pen floors (50% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens), entrance gates of stun boxes (27.8% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens), and stun box floors (22.2% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens); (iv) the most frequently contaminated sites in sheep lairages were unloading ramp floors, holding pen floors, and water troughs (33.3, 22.2, and 22.2%, respectively); and (v) overall, cattle lairages and cow hides were more frequently contaminated with the pathogens than were lamb lairages and lamb pelts. Further research is needed to develop strategies for the incorporation of pathogen control in lairages into integrated microbial meat safety systems.
doi_str_mv 10.4315/0362-028X-65.6.931
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29798239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18609467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2c476cd3c0b5a2a9878ade0cc02d628dfe53311c28f84470fb923a23562630e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhnVoqJ00f6CHolNOWVcarbTSsRjnAwwutIXcxKxWW6vsrlxpHZJ_H29s0mMDAwPDM-8MPIR85mxRCi6_MqGgYKAfCiUXamEE_0Dmb8MZOc_5D2MMDKiPZMaBGahAzsnT9zj6YQzY0TYmOm49zbvksaGxpavstj4Ftw1IXewC3XBZXdMf2PVx8F2H1xSHhi6x3z13sUY3-kTD8JrSYUj421M_PIYUh_5whOKhahzHGFL-RM5a7LK_PPUL8utm9XN5V6w3t_fLb-vClUKNBbiyUq4RjtUSAY2uNDaeOcegUaCb1kshOHegW12WFWtrAwJBSAVKMF-KC3J1zN2l-Hfv82j7kN30_ODjPlswldEgzDtAKbjS1X9BrhUzpZpAOIIuxZyTb-0uhR7Ts-XMTtbsJMhOgqySVtmDtcPSl1P6vu5982_lpEy8ACGKlIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18609467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential for the spread of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, and Campylobacter in the lairage environment at abattoirs</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Small, A ; Reid, C A ; Avery, S M ; Karabasil, N ; Crowley, C ; Buncic, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Small, A ; Reid, C A ; Avery, S M ; Karabasil, N ; Crowley, C ; Buncic, S</creatorcontrib><description>Prevalences of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were examined in 270 swabs taken from selected sites along the unloading-to-slaughter routes of animal movement in lairages of six commercial abattoirs, three for cattle and three for sheep. The overall prevalences of the pathogens in the respective lairage environments were compared with those for 270 swabs from the pelts of 90 lambs examined in the present study and 270 swabs from the hides of 90 cattle examined in a previous study that were slaughtered at the same abattoirs on the same days. Also, the results obtained were analyzed with the aim of identifying critical points at which animal-environment-animal transfer of the pathogens in lairages occurs. The results showed that (i) the overall prevalences of E. coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were 27.2, 6.1, and 1.1%, respectively, in cattle lairages and 2.2, 1.1, and 5.6%, respectively, in sheep lairages; (ii) the overall prevalences of the three pathogens on cow hides (28.8, 17.7, and 0%, respectively) and sheep pelts (5.5, 7.8, and 0%, respectively) were higher than the overall prevalences in the respective lairage environments; (iii) the most frequently contaminated sites in cattle lairages were holding pen floors (50% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens), entrance gates of stun boxes (27.8% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens), and stun box floors (22.2% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens); (iv) the most frequently contaminated sites in sheep lairages were unloading ramp floors, holding pen floors, and water troughs (33.3, 22.2, and 22.2%, respectively); and (v) overall, cattle lairages and cow hides were more frequently contaminated with the pathogens than were lamb lairages and lamb pelts. Further research is needed to develop strategies for the incorporation of pathogen control in lairages into integrated microbial meat safety systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-65.6.931</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12092725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Abattoirs ; Animals ; Campylobacter - growth & development ; Campylobacter - isolation & purification ; Cattle ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Escherichia coli O157 - growth & development ; Escherichia coli O157 - isolation & purification ; Food Microbiology ; Meat - microbiology ; Meat - standards ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Salmonella - growth & development ; Salmonella - isolation & purification ; Sheep]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2002-06, Vol.65 (6), p.931-936</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2c476cd3c0b5a2a9878ade0cc02d628dfe53311c28f84470fb923a23562630e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2c476cd3c0b5a2a9878ade0cc02d628dfe53311c28f84470fb923a23562630e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12092725$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Small, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, C A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avery, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karabasil, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buncic, S</creatorcontrib><title>Potential for the spread of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, and Campylobacter in the lairage environment at abattoirs</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>Prevalences of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were examined in 270 swabs taken from selected sites along the unloading-to-slaughter routes of animal movement in lairages of six commercial abattoirs, three for cattle and three for sheep. The overall prevalences of the pathogens in the respective lairage environments were compared with those for 270 swabs from the pelts of 90 lambs examined in the present study and 270 swabs from the hides of 90 cattle examined in a previous study that were slaughtered at the same abattoirs on the same days. Also, the results obtained were analyzed with the aim of identifying critical points at which animal-environment-animal transfer of the pathogens in lairages occurs. The results showed that (i) the overall prevalences of E. coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were 27.2, 6.1, and 1.1%, respectively, in cattle lairages and 2.2, 1.1, and 5.6%, respectively, in sheep lairages; (ii) the overall prevalences of the three pathogens on cow hides (28.8, 17.7, and 0%, respectively) and sheep pelts (5.5, 7.8, and 0%, respectively) were higher than the overall prevalences in the respective lairage environments; (iii) the most frequently contaminated sites in cattle lairages were holding pen floors (50% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens), entrance gates of stun boxes (27.8% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens), and stun box floors (22.2% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens); (iv) the most frequently contaminated sites in sheep lairages were unloading ramp floors, holding pen floors, and water troughs (33.3, 22.2, and 22.2%, respectively); and (v) overall, cattle lairages and cow hides were more frequently contaminated with the pathogens than were lamb lairages and lamb pelts. Further research is needed to develop strategies for the incorporation of pathogen control in lairages into integrated microbial meat safety systems.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Campylobacter - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Salmonella - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhnVoqJ00f6CHolNOWVcarbTSsRjnAwwutIXcxKxWW6vsrlxpHZJ_H29s0mMDAwPDM-8MPIR85mxRCi6_MqGgYKAfCiUXamEE_0Dmb8MZOc_5D2MMDKiPZMaBGahAzsnT9zj6YQzY0TYmOm49zbvksaGxpavstj4Ftw1IXewC3XBZXdMf2PVx8F2H1xSHhi6x3z13sUY3-kTD8JrSYUj421M_PIYUh_5whOKhahzHGFL-RM5a7LK_PPUL8utm9XN5V6w3t_fLb-vClUKNBbiyUq4RjtUSAY2uNDaeOcegUaCb1kshOHegW12WFWtrAwJBSAVKMF-KC3J1zN2l-Hfv82j7kN30_ODjPlswldEgzDtAKbjS1X9BrhUzpZpAOIIuxZyTb-0uhR7Ts-XMTtbsJMhOgqySVtmDtcPSl1P6vu5982_lpEy8ACGKlIQ</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>Small, A</creator><creator>Reid, C A</creator><creator>Avery, S M</creator><creator>Karabasil, N</creator><creator>Crowley, C</creator><creator>Buncic, S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Potential for the spread of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, and Campylobacter in the lairage environment at abattoirs</title><author>Small, A ; Reid, C A ; Avery, S M ; Karabasil, N ; Crowley, C ; Buncic, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2c476cd3c0b5a2a9878ade0cc02d628dfe53311c28f84470fb923a23562630e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Campylobacter - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Salmonella - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Small, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, C A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avery, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karabasil, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buncic, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Small, A</au><au>Reid, C A</au><au>Avery, S M</au><au>Karabasil, N</au><au>Crowley, C</au><au>Buncic, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential for the spread of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, and Campylobacter in the lairage environment at abattoirs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>931</spage><epage>936</epage><pages>931-936</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><abstract>Prevalences of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were examined in 270 swabs taken from selected sites along the unloading-to-slaughter routes of animal movement in lairages of six commercial abattoirs, three for cattle and three for sheep. The overall prevalences of the pathogens in the respective lairage environments were compared with those for 270 swabs from the pelts of 90 lambs examined in the present study and 270 swabs from the hides of 90 cattle examined in a previous study that were slaughtered at the same abattoirs on the same days. Also, the results obtained were analyzed with the aim of identifying critical points at which animal-environment-animal transfer of the pathogens in lairages occurs. The results showed that (i) the overall prevalences of E. coli O157, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. were 27.2, 6.1, and 1.1%, respectively, in cattle lairages and 2.2, 1.1, and 5.6%, respectively, in sheep lairages; (ii) the overall prevalences of the three pathogens on cow hides (28.8, 17.7, and 0%, respectively) and sheep pelts (5.5, 7.8, and 0%, respectively) were higher than the overall prevalences in the respective lairage environments; (iii) the most frequently contaminated sites in cattle lairages were holding pen floors (50% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens), entrance gates of stun boxes (27.8% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens), and stun box floors (22.2% of swabs positive for one or more pathogens); (iv) the most frequently contaminated sites in sheep lairages were unloading ramp floors, holding pen floors, and water troughs (33.3, 22.2, and 22.2%, respectively); and (v) overall, cattle lairages and cow hides were more frequently contaminated with the pathogens than were lamb lairages and lamb pelts. Further research is needed to develop strategies for the incorporation of pathogen control in lairages into integrated microbial meat safety systems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12092725</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X-65.6.931</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-028X
ispartof Journal of food protection, 2002-06, Vol.65 (6), p.931-936
issn 0362-028X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29798239
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abattoirs
Animals
Campylobacter - growth & development
Campylobacter - isolation & purification
Cattle
Colony Count, Microbial
Escherichia coli O157 - growth & development
Escherichia coli O157 - isolation & purification
Food Microbiology
Meat - microbiology
Meat - standards
Prevalence
Risk Factors
Salmonella - growth & development
Salmonella - isolation & purification
Sheep
title Potential for the spread of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, and Campylobacter in the lairage environment at abattoirs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A26%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20for%20the%20spread%20of%20Escherichia%20coli%20O157,%20Salmonella,%20and%20Campylobacter%20in%20the%20lairage%20environment%20at%20abattoirs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Small,%20A&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=931&rft.epage=936&rft.pages=931-936&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X-65.6.931&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18609467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2c476cd3c0b5a2a9878ade0cc02d628dfe53311c28f84470fb923a23562630e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18609467&rft_id=info:pmid/12092725&rfr_iscdi=true