Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: the contribution of working conditions

• Published in: International journal of epidemiology 1998-12, Vol.27 (6), p.1011-1018
• Main Authors: Schrijvers, Carola TM, van de Mheen, H Dike, Stronks, Karien, Mackenbach, Johan P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis. Health state; Biological and medical sciences; Epidemiology; Female; Follow-Up Studies; General aspects; Health Status; Humans; Job Satisfaction; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Netherlands - epidemiology; occupational class; Occupational Diseases - epidemiology; Occupational Diseases - etiology; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects; Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data; Occupational Health; Odds Ratio; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Retrospective Studies; Social Class; Socioeconomic inequalities in health; Surveys and Questionnaires; Work Simplification; working conditions; Workplace - standards; Workplace - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 0300-5771; 1464-3685; 1464-3685
• DOI: 10.1093/ije/27.6.1011

Background The aim was to study the impact of different categories of working conditions on the association between occupational class and self-reported health in the working population. Methods Data were collected through a postal survey conducted in 1991 among inhabitants of 18 municipalities in the southeastern Netherlands. Data concerned 4521 working men and 2411 working women and included current occupational class (seven classes), working conditions (physical working conditions, job control, job demands, social support at work), perceived general health (very good or good versus less than good) and demographic confounders. Data were analysed with logistic regression techniques. Results For both men and women we observed a higher odds ratio for a less than good perceived general health in the lower occupational classes (adjusted for confounders). The odds of a less than good perceived general health was larger among people reporting more hazardous physical working conditions, lower job control, lower social support at work and among those in the highest category of job demands. Results were similar for men and women. Men and women in the lower occupational classes reported more hazardous physical working conditions and lower job control as compared to those in higher occupational dasses. High job demands were more often reported in the higher occupational classes, while social support at work was not dearly related to occupational class. When physical working conditions and job control were added simultaneously to a model with occupational class and confounders, the odds ratios for occupational classes were reduced substantially. For men, the per cent change in the odds ratios for the occupational dasses ranged between 35% and 83%, and for women between 35% and 46%. Conclusions A substantial part of the association between occupational class and a less than good perceived general health in the working population could be attributed to a differential distribution of hazardous physical working conditions and a low job control across occupational classes. This suggests that interventions aimed at improving these working conditions might result in a reduction of socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population.