Loading…
Cause-of-Death Determinants of Lifespan Inequality
We propose a novel decomposition approach that breaks down the levels trends of lifespan inequality as the sum of cause-of-death contributions. The suggested method shows whether the levels and changes in lifespan inequality are attributable to the levels and changes in (1) the extent of inequality...
Saved in:
Published in: | Demography 2024-04, Vol.61 (2), p.513-540 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We propose a novel decomposition approach that breaks down the levels
trends of lifespan inequality as the sum of cause-of-death contributions. The suggested method shows whether the levels and changes in lifespan inequality are attributable to the levels and changes in (1) the extent of inequality in the cause-specific age-at-death distribution (the “Inequality” component), (2) the total share of deaths attributable to each cause (the “Proportion” component), or (3) the cause-specific mean age at death (the “Mean” component). This so-called
(or IPM) method is applied to 10 low-mortality countries in Europe. Our findings suggest that the most prevalent causes of death (in our setting, “circulatory system” and “neoplasms”) do not necessarily contribute the most to overall levels of lifespan inequality. In fact, “perinatal and congenital” causes are the strongest drivers of lifespan inequality declines. The contribution of the IPM components to changes in lifespan inequality varies considerably across causes, genders, and countries. Among the three components, the Mean one explains the least lifespan inequality dynamics, suggesting that shifts in cause-specific mean ages at death
contributed little to changes in lifespan inequality. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0070-3370 1533-7790 |
DOI: | 10.1215/00703370-11245278 |