Loading…
Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency
The purpose of this study was to compare people’s perception of their computer-email-web (CEW) fluency to their actual abilities performing related tasks. A total of 61 subjects (51% female, mean age 19) participated in the research sessions. Participants completed the CEW fluency scale [Bunz, U. (2...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computers in human behavior 2007-09, Vol.23 (5), p.2321-2344 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The purpose of this study was to compare people’s
perception of their computer-email-web (CEW) fluency to their
actual abilities performing related tasks. A total of 61 subjects (51% female, mean age 19) participated in the research sessions. Participants completed the CEW fluency scale [Bunz, U. (2004). The computer-email-web (CEW) fluency scale – Development and validation.
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,
17(4), 477–504.], the computer anxiety ratings scale [Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale.
Computers in Human Behavior,
3, 49–59.], and an applied protocol developed for this study. Results show that the less computer anxiety subjects reported, the higher they
perceived their CEW fluency to be (
p
=
.001), but there was no significant relationship between computer anxiety and
actual fluency (
p
=
.12). There was no gender difference as to
actual CEW fluency (
p
=
.11), but women
perceived their fluency lower than did men (
p
=
.012). Overall results validate the robustness of the CEW fluency scale, help identify CEW fluency as a digital divide component, and underscore the importance of initiatives to raise women’s technological self-confidence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0747-5632 1873-7692 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.008 |