Loading…

Systematic occupational health and safety work in Norway: a decade of implementation

A regulation enforcing systematic occupational health and safety work (OHS) in Norwegian enterprises was evaluated on the basis of process criteria stated in the regulation; managerial involvement, active participation from the employees, sufficient training, and a recommended systematic stepwise ap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Safety science 2003-11, Vol.41 (9), p.721-738
Main Authors: Øystein Saksvik, Per, Torvatn, Hans, Nytrø, Kjell
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5f54b8eebe775a4bff88735907c7af3f534c2843dd78ebeb5f467d09a68e1b3b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5f54b8eebe775a4bff88735907c7af3f534c2843dd78ebeb5f467d09a68e1b3b3
container_end_page 738
container_issue 9
container_start_page 721
container_title Safety science
container_volume 41
creator Øystein Saksvik, Per
Torvatn, Hans
Nytrø, Kjell
description A regulation enforcing systematic occupational health and safety work (OHS) in Norwegian enterprises was evaluated on the basis of process criteria stated in the regulation; managerial involvement, active participation from the employees, sufficient training, and a recommended systematic stepwise approach for the implementation process. Data on effects of the regulation were also collected. Results indicated that an unsystematic approach was used by those who had not finished implementing the regulation with relatively more emphasis on “OHS improvement actions” than on the expected preceding step “assessments” and “action plans”. Forty-seven percent of all enterprises in Norway, based on self-reports, fulfilled the claims of the regulation in 1999. They had higher levels of training and higher scores on the OHS-activities “assessments” and “action plans”. Data and statistics on effects were found unsatisfactory and could not be used in the evaluation due to reduction in unemployment and improved registration procedures during the mid-1990s
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00020-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29914814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925753502000206</els_id><sourcerecordid>29727662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5f54b8eebe775a4bff88735907c7af3f534c2843dd78ebeb5f467d09a68e1b3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1v1DAQBmALUYml5Scg-QKCQ6i_7XBBVUULUlUOLWdr4oxVQxIvdpZq_z3Z3QqOy8k-PO-MNC8hrzn7wBk353esFbqxWup3TLxnjAnWmGdkxZ1tG86UeE5Wf8kL8rLWHwvi0vAVub_b1hlHmFOgOYTNevnlCQb6gDDMDxSmnlaIOG_pYy4_aZrobS6PsP1IgfYYoEeaI03jesARp3kfPyMnEYaKr57eU_L96vP95Zfm5tv118uLmyYow-dGR606h9ihtRpUF6NzVuqW2WAhyqilCsIp2ffWLajTURnbsxaMQ97JTp6St4e565J_bbDOfkw14DDAhHlTvWhbrhxX_wGtsMaI49AtB2-NPQq5c1wqZhaoDzCUXGvB6NcljVC2njO_q8_v6_O7bjwTfl-f3-XePC2AGmCIBaaQ6r-wZi1b4ov7dHC4HPp3wuJrSDgF7FPBMPs-pyOb_gCx4K6d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18813406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic occupational health and safety work in Norway: a decade of implementation</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Øystein Saksvik, Per ; Torvatn, Hans ; Nytrø, Kjell</creator><creatorcontrib>Øystein Saksvik, Per ; Torvatn, Hans ; Nytrø, Kjell</creatorcontrib><description>A regulation enforcing systematic occupational health and safety work (OHS) in Norwegian enterprises was evaluated on the basis of process criteria stated in the regulation; managerial involvement, active participation from the employees, sufficient training, and a recommended systematic stepwise approach for the implementation process. Data on effects of the regulation were also collected. Results indicated that an unsystematic approach was used by those who had not finished implementing the regulation with relatively more emphasis on “OHS improvement actions” than on the expected preceding step “assessments” and “action plans”. Forty-seven percent of all enterprises in Norway, based on self-reports, fulfilled the claims of the regulation in 1999. They had higher levels of training and higher scores on the OHS-activities “assessments” and “action plans”. Data and statistics on effects were found unsatisfactory and could not be used in the evaluation due to reduction in unemployment and improved registration procedures during the mid-1990s</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00020-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical compounds (mineral, organic) ; Chemical, physic and infectious diseases ; Evaluation ; Implementation process ; Internal control ; Medical sciences ; Occupational health and safety ; Occupational medicine ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2003-11, Vol.41 (9), p.721-738</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5f54b8eebe775a4bff88735907c7af3f534c2843dd78ebeb5f467d09a68e1b3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5f54b8eebe775a4bff88735907c7af3f534c2843dd78ebeb5f467d09a68e1b3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15090101$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Øystein Saksvik, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torvatn, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nytrø, Kjell</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic occupational health and safety work in Norway: a decade of implementation</title><title>Safety science</title><description>A regulation enforcing systematic occupational health and safety work (OHS) in Norwegian enterprises was evaluated on the basis of process criteria stated in the regulation; managerial involvement, active participation from the employees, sufficient training, and a recommended systematic stepwise approach for the implementation process. Data on effects of the regulation were also collected. Results indicated that an unsystematic approach was used by those who had not finished implementing the regulation with relatively more emphasis on “OHS improvement actions” than on the expected preceding step “assessments” and “action plans”. Forty-seven percent of all enterprises in Norway, based on self-reports, fulfilled the claims of the regulation in 1999. They had higher levels of training and higher scores on the OHS-activities “assessments” and “action plans”. Data and statistics on effects were found unsatisfactory and could not be used in the evaluation due to reduction in unemployment and improved registration procedures during the mid-1990s</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical compounds (mineral, organic)</subject><subject>Chemical, physic and infectious diseases</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Implementation process</subject><subject>Internal control</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational health and safety</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><issn>1879-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0U1v1DAQBmALUYml5Scg-QKCQ6i_7XBBVUULUlUOLWdr4oxVQxIvdpZq_z3Z3QqOy8k-PO-MNC8hrzn7wBk353esFbqxWup3TLxnjAnWmGdkxZ1tG86UeE5Wf8kL8rLWHwvi0vAVub_b1hlHmFOgOYTNevnlCQb6gDDMDxSmnlaIOG_pYy4_aZrobS6PsP1IgfYYoEeaI03jesARp3kfPyMnEYaKr57eU_L96vP95Zfm5tv118uLmyYow-dGR606h9ihtRpUF6NzVuqW2WAhyqilCsIp2ffWLajTURnbsxaMQ97JTp6St4e565J_bbDOfkw14DDAhHlTvWhbrhxX_wGtsMaI49AtB2-NPQq5c1wqZhaoDzCUXGvB6NcljVC2njO_q8_v6_O7bjwTfl-f3-XePC2AGmCIBaaQ6r-wZi1b4ov7dHC4HPp3wuJrSDgF7FPBMPs-pyOb_gCx4K6d</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Øystein Saksvik, Per</creator><creator>Torvatn, Hans</creator><creator>Nytrø, Kjell</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>Systematic occupational health and safety work in Norway: a decade of implementation</title><author>Øystein Saksvik, Per ; Torvatn, Hans ; Nytrø, Kjell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5f54b8eebe775a4bff88735907c7af3f534c2843dd78ebeb5f467d09a68e1b3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical compounds (mineral, organic)</topic><topic>Chemical, physic and infectious diseases</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Implementation process</topic><topic>Internal control</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational health and safety</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Øystein Saksvik, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torvatn, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nytrø, Kjell</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Øystein Saksvik, Per</au><au>Torvatn, Hans</au><au>Nytrø, Kjell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic occupational health and safety work in Norway: a decade of implementation</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>738</epage><pages>721-738</pages><issn>0925-7535</issn><eissn>1879-1042</eissn><abstract>A regulation enforcing systematic occupational health and safety work (OHS) in Norwegian enterprises was evaluated on the basis of process criteria stated in the regulation; managerial involvement, active participation from the employees, sufficient training, and a recommended systematic stepwise approach for the implementation process. Data on effects of the regulation were also collected. Results indicated that an unsystematic approach was used by those who had not finished implementing the regulation with relatively more emphasis on “OHS improvement actions” than on the expected preceding step “assessments” and “action plans”. Forty-seven percent of all enterprises in Norway, based on self-reports, fulfilled the claims of the regulation in 1999. They had higher levels of training and higher scores on the OHS-activities “assessments” and “action plans”. Data and statistics on effects were found unsatisfactory and could not be used in the evaluation due to reduction in unemployment and improved registration procedures during the mid-1990s</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00020-6</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-7535
ispartof Safety science, 2003-11, Vol.41 (9), p.721-738
issn 0925-7535
1879-1042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29914814
source Elsevier
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Chemical compounds (mineral, organic)
Chemical, physic and infectious diseases
Evaluation
Implementation process
Internal control
Medical sciences
Occupational health and safety
Occupational medicine
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
title Systematic occupational health and safety work in Norway: a decade of implementation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A08%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20occupational%20health%20and%20safety%20work%20in%20Norway:%20a%20decade%20of%20implementation&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=%C3%98ystein%20Saksvik,%20Per&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=738&rft.pages=721-738&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.eissn=1879-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00020-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29727662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5f54b8eebe775a4bff88735907c7af3f534c2843dd78ebeb5f467d09a68e1b3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18813406&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true