Loading…
An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper
The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2007-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2066-2074 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703 |
container_end_page | 2074 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2066 |
container_title | Environmental toxicology and chemistry |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | March, Ferrella A. Dwyer, F. James Augspurger, Tom Ingersoll, Christopher G. Wang, Ning Mebane, Christopher A. |
description | The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) hardness‐based 1996 ambient copper water quality criteria, the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model and the 2005 state of Oklahoma copper water quality standards. Both the criterion maximum concentration and criterion continuous concentration were evaluated. Published acute and chronic copper toxicity data that met American Society for Testing and Materials guidance for test acceptability were obtained for exposures conducted with glochidia or juvenile freshwater mussels. We tabulated toxicity data for glochidia and juveniles to calculate 20 species mean acute values for freshwater mussels. Generally, freshwater mussel species mean acute values were similar to those of the more sensitive species included in the U.S. EPA water quality derivation database. When added to the database of genus mean acute values used in deriving 1996 copper water quality criteria, 14 freshwater mussel genus mean acute values included 10 of the lowest 15 genus mean acute values, with three mussel species having the lowest values. Chronic exposure and sublethal effects freshwater mussel data available for four species and acute to chronic ratios were used to evaluate the criterion continuous concentration. On the basis of the freshwater mussel toxicity data used in this assessment, the hardness‐based 1996 U.S. EPA water quality criteria, the 2005 Oklahoma water quality standards, and the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model might need to be revised to afford protection to freshwater mussels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1897/06-560R.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30117566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20514011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALgehSOPAHkMUBiUPK2I6_jtWqLKAFpKqo3CwnnlCXbLK1k7b770m0qyIhoV7sy_POeDyEvGZwwozVH0AVUsH5CXtCFkxKXhjFzFOyAC2g0FyZI_Ii52sApqy1z8kR00Zpo9WCjKcdxVvfjn6IfUf7hjYJ89WdHzDRzZgztnTo72Mdhx0NfvA0dnS4QhowxduH0N7fjL6d3a8xBt_VSH0XaB6m06eQadMnWvfbLaaX5Fnj24yvDvcx-fHx7GL5qVh_X31enq6LujRqGgo5B6t5xWpe8cY3QkoIwZQStbVYKel1sAJ8pXWoS0AVKiYEl4qXTaVBHJN3-7rb1N-MmAe3ibnGtvUd9mN2AhjTUqlHIQfJygk_CllpBBNqbv32H3jdj6mbpnWcgdDSWDuh93tUpz7nhI3bprjxaecYuHm1DpSbV-vmzm8OBcdqg-GvPOxyAuUe3MUWd_-v5CY0_RBwxQDmWLGPxTzg_UPMp99O6emd7vLbyn39sry4_Hm-divxB3TuvRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210375899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>March, Ferrella A. ; Dwyer, F. James ; Augspurger, Tom ; Ingersoll, Christopher G. ; Wang, Ning ; Mebane, Christopher A.</creator><creatorcontrib>March, Ferrella A. ; Dwyer, F. James ; Augspurger, Tom ; Ingersoll, Christopher G. ; Wang, Ning ; Mebane, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><description>The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) hardness‐based 1996 ambient copper water quality criteria, the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model and the 2005 state of Oklahoma copper water quality standards. Both the criterion maximum concentration and criterion continuous concentration were evaluated. Published acute and chronic copper toxicity data that met American Society for Testing and Materials guidance for test acceptability were obtained for exposures conducted with glochidia or juvenile freshwater mussels. We tabulated toxicity data for glochidia and juveniles to calculate 20 species mean acute values for freshwater mussels. Generally, freshwater mussel species mean acute values were similar to those of the more sensitive species included in the U.S. EPA water quality derivation database. When added to the database of genus mean acute values used in deriving 1996 copper water quality criteria, 14 freshwater mussel genus mean acute values included 10 of the lowest 15 genus mean acute values, with three mussel species having the lowest values. Chronic exposure and sublethal effects freshwater mussel data available for four species and acute to chronic ratios were used to evaluate the criterion continuous concentration. On the basis of the freshwater mussel toxicity data used in this assessment, the hardness‐based 1996 U.S. EPA water quality criteria, the 2005 Oklahoma water quality standards, and the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model might need to be revised to afford protection to freshwater mussels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1897/06-560R.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17867876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Bivalvia - drug effects ; Copper ; Copper - standards ; Copper - toxicity ; Ecology ; Environmental management ; Environmental protection ; Fish ; Fresh Water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecology ; Guidelines as Topic ; Hardness ; Mollusca ; Mollusks ; Mussels ; Protected species ; Quality standards ; Risk Assessment ; Sublethal effects ; Toxicity ; Water ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity ; Water quality ; Water quality standards ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2007-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2066-2074</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 SETAC</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17867876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>March, Ferrella A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, F. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augspurger, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mebane, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><description>The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) hardness‐based 1996 ambient copper water quality criteria, the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model and the 2005 state of Oklahoma copper water quality standards. Both the criterion maximum concentration and criterion continuous concentration were evaluated. Published acute and chronic copper toxicity data that met American Society for Testing and Materials guidance for test acceptability were obtained for exposures conducted with glochidia or juvenile freshwater mussels. We tabulated toxicity data for glochidia and juveniles to calculate 20 species mean acute values for freshwater mussels. Generally, freshwater mussel species mean acute values were similar to those of the more sensitive species included in the U.S. EPA water quality derivation database. When added to the database of genus mean acute values used in deriving 1996 copper water quality criteria, 14 freshwater mussel genus mean acute values included 10 of the lowest 15 genus mean acute values, with three mussel species having the lowest values. Chronic exposure and sublethal effects freshwater mussel data available for four species and acute to chronic ratios were used to evaluate the criterion continuous concentration. On the basis of the freshwater mussel toxicity data used in this assessment, the hardness‐based 1996 U.S. EPA water quality criteria, the 2005 Oklahoma water quality standards, and the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model might need to be revised to afford protection to freshwater mussels.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Bivalvia - drug effects</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper - standards</subject><subject>Copper - toxicity</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecology</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Mussels</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sublethal effects</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality standards</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALgehSOPAHkMUBiUPK2I6_jtWqLKAFpKqo3CwnnlCXbLK1k7b770m0qyIhoV7sy_POeDyEvGZwwozVH0AVUsH5CXtCFkxKXhjFzFOyAC2g0FyZI_Ii52sApqy1z8kR00Zpo9WCjKcdxVvfjn6IfUf7hjYJ89WdHzDRzZgztnTo72Mdhx0NfvA0dnS4QhowxduH0N7fjL6d3a8xBt_VSH0XaB6m06eQadMnWvfbLaaX5Fnj24yvDvcx-fHx7GL5qVh_X31enq6LujRqGgo5B6t5xWpe8cY3QkoIwZQStbVYKel1sAJ8pXWoS0AVKiYEl4qXTaVBHJN3-7rb1N-MmAe3ibnGtvUd9mN2AhjTUqlHIQfJygk_CllpBBNqbv32H3jdj6mbpnWcgdDSWDuh93tUpz7nhI3bprjxaecYuHm1DpSbV-vmzm8OBcdqg-GvPOxyAuUe3MUWd_-v5CY0_RBwxQDmWLGPxTzg_UPMp99O6emd7vLbyn39sry4_Hm-divxB3TuvRU</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>March, Ferrella A.</creator><creator>Dwyer, F. James</creator><creator>Augspurger, Tom</creator><creator>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creator><creator>Wang, Ning</creator><creator>Mebane, Christopher A.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper</title><author>March, Ferrella A. ; Dwyer, F. James ; Augspurger, Tom ; Ingersoll, Christopher G. ; Wang, Ning ; Mebane, Christopher A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Bivalvia - drug effects</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper - standards</topic><topic>Copper - toxicity</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecology</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Mussels</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sublethal effects</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality standards</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>March, Ferrella A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, F. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augspurger, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mebane, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>March, Ferrella A.</au><au>Dwyer, F. James</au><au>Augspurger, Tom</au><au>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</au><au>Wang, Ning</au><au>Mebane, Christopher A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2066</spage><epage>2074</epage><pages>2066-2074</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><abstract>The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) hardness‐based 1996 ambient copper water quality criteria, the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model and the 2005 state of Oklahoma copper water quality standards. Both the criterion maximum concentration and criterion continuous concentration were evaluated. Published acute and chronic copper toxicity data that met American Society for Testing and Materials guidance for test acceptability were obtained for exposures conducted with glochidia or juvenile freshwater mussels. We tabulated toxicity data for glochidia and juveniles to calculate 20 species mean acute values for freshwater mussels. Generally, freshwater mussel species mean acute values were similar to those of the more sensitive species included in the U.S. EPA water quality derivation database. When added to the database of genus mean acute values used in deriving 1996 copper water quality criteria, 14 freshwater mussel genus mean acute values included 10 of the lowest 15 genus mean acute values, with three mussel species having the lowest values. Chronic exposure and sublethal effects freshwater mussel data available for four species and acute to chronic ratios were used to evaluate the criterion continuous concentration. On the basis of the freshwater mussel toxicity data used in this assessment, the hardness‐based 1996 U.S. EPA water quality criteria, the 2005 Oklahoma water quality standards, and the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model might need to be revised to afford protection to freshwater mussels.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>17867876</pmid><doi>10.1897/06-560R.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-7268 |
ispartof | Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2007-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2066-2074 |
issn | 0730-7268 1552-8618 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30117566 |
source | Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Animals Aquatic ecosystems Bivalvia - drug effects Copper Copper - standards Copper - toxicity Ecology Environmental management Environmental protection Fish Fresh Water Freshwater Freshwater ecology Guidelines as Topic Hardness Mollusca Mollusks Mussels Protected species Quality standards Risk Assessment Sublethal effects Toxicity Water Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity Water quality Water quality standards Wildlife conservation |
title | An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20freshwater%20mussel%20toxicity%20data%20in%20the%20derivation%20of%20water%20quality%20guidance%20and%20standards%20for%20copper&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=March,%20Ferrella%20A.&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2066&rft.epage=2074&rft.pages=2066-2074&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1897/06-560R.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20514011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210375899&rft_id=info:pmid/17867876&rfr_iscdi=true |