Loading…

An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper

The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2007-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2066-2074
Main Authors: March, Ferrella A., Dwyer, F. James, Augspurger, Tom, Ingersoll, Christopher G., Wang, Ning, Mebane, Christopher A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703
container_end_page 2074
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2066
container_title Environmental toxicology and chemistry
container_volume 26
creator March, Ferrella A.
Dwyer, F. James
Augspurger, Tom
Ingersoll, Christopher G.
Wang, Ning
Mebane, Christopher A.
description The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) hardness‐based 1996 ambient copper water quality criteria, the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model and the 2005 state of Oklahoma copper water quality standards. Both the criterion maximum concentration and criterion continuous concentration were evaluated. Published acute and chronic copper toxicity data that met American Society for Testing and Materials guidance for test acceptability were obtained for exposures conducted with glochidia or juvenile freshwater mussels. We tabulated toxicity data for glochidia and juveniles to calculate 20 species mean acute values for freshwater mussels. Generally, freshwater mussel species mean acute values were similar to those of the more sensitive species included in the U.S. EPA water quality derivation database. When added to the database of genus mean acute values used in deriving 1996 copper water quality criteria, 14 freshwater mussel genus mean acute values included 10 of the lowest 15 genus mean acute values, with three mussel species having the lowest values. Chronic exposure and sublethal effects freshwater mussel data available for four species and acute to chronic ratios were used to evaluate the criterion continuous concentration. On the basis of the freshwater mussel toxicity data used in this assessment, the hardness‐based 1996 U.S. EPA water quality criteria, the 2005 Oklahoma water quality standards, and the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model might need to be revised to afford protection to freshwater mussels.
doi_str_mv 10.1897/06-560R.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30117566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20514011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALgehSOPAHkMUBiUPK2I6_jtWqLKAFpKqo3CwnnlCXbLK1k7b770m0qyIhoV7sy_POeDyEvGZwwozVH0AVUsH5CXtCFkxKXhjFzFOyAC2g0FyZI_Ii52sApqy1z8kR00Zpo9WCjKcdxVvfjn6IfUf7hjYJ89WdHzDRzZgztnTo72Mdhx0NfvA0dnS4QhowxduH0N7fjL6d3a8xBt_VSH0XaB6m06eQadMnWvfbLaaX5Fnj24yvDvcx-fHx7GL5qVh_X31enq6LujRqGgo5B6t5xWpe8cY3QkoIwZQStbVYKel1sAJ8pXWoS0AVKiYEl4qXTaVBHJN3-7rb1N-MmAe3ibnGtvUd9mN2AhjTUqlHIQfJygk_CllpBBNqbv32H3jdj6mbpnWcgdDSWDuh93tUpz7nhI3bprjxaecYuHm1DpSbV-vmzm8OBcdqg-GvPOxyAuUe3MUWd_-v5CY0_RBwxQDmWLGPxTzg_UPMp99O6emd7vLbyn39sry4_Hm-divxB3TuvRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210375899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>March, Ferrella A. ; Dwyer, F. James ; Augspurger, Tom ; Ingersoll, Christopher G. ; Wang, Ning ; Mebane, Christopher A.</creator><creatorcontrib>March, Ferrella A. ; Dwyer, F. James ; Augspurger, Tom ; Ingersoll, Christopher G. ; Wang, Ning ; Mebane, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><description>The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) hardness‐based 1996 ambient copper water quality criteria, the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model and the 2005 state of Oklahoma copper water quality standards. Both the criterion maximum concentration and criterion continuous concentration were evaluated. Published acute and chronic copper toxicity data that met American Society for Testing and Materials guidance for test acceptability were obtained for exposures conducted with glochidia or juvenile freshwater mussels. We tabulated toxicity data for glochidia and juveniles to calculate 20 species mean acute values for freshwater mussels. Generally, freshwater mussel species mean acute values were similar to those of the more sensitive species included in the U.S. EPA water quality derivation database. When added to the database of genus mean acute values used in deriving 1996 copper water quality criteria, 14 freshwater mussel genus mean acute values included 10 of the lowest 15 genus mean acute values, with three mussel species having the lowest values. Chronic exposure and sublethal effects freshwater mussel data available for four species and acute to chronic ratios were used to evaluate the criterion continuous concentration. On the basis of the freshwater mussel toxicity data used in this assessment, the hardness‐based 1996 U.S. EPA water quality criteria, the 2005 Oklahoma water quality standards, and the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model might need to be revised to afford protection to freshwater mussels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1897/06-560R.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17867876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Bivalvia - drug effects ; Copper ; Copper - standards ; Copper - toxicity ; Ecology ; Environmental management ; Environmental protection ; Fish ; Fresh Water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecology ; Guidelines as Topic ; Hardness ; Mollusca ; Mollusks ; Mussels ; Protected species ; Quality standards ; Risk Assessment ; Sublethal effects ; Toxicity ; Water ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity ; Water quality ; Water quality standards ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2007-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2066-2074</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 SETAC</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17867876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>March, Ferrella A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, F. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augspurger, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mebane, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><description>The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) hardness‐based 1996 ambient copper water quality criteria, the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model and the 2005 state of Oklahoma copper water quality standards. Both the criterion maximum concentration and criterion continuous concentration were evaluated. Published acute and chronic copper toxicity data that met American Society for Testing and Materials guidance for test acceptability were obtained for exposures conducted with glochidia or juvenile freshwater mussels. We tabulated toxicity data for glochidia and juveniles to calculate 20 species mean acute values for freshwater mussels. Generally, freshwater mussel species mean acute values were similar to those of the more sensitive species included in the U.S. EPA water quality derivation database. When added to the database of genus mean acute values used in deriving 1996 copper water quality criteria, 14 freshwater mussel genus mean acute values included 10 of the lowest 15 genus mean acute values, with three mussel species having the lowest values. Chronic exposure and sublethal effects freshwater mussel data available for four species and acute to chronic ratios were used to evaluate the criterion continuous concentration. On the basis of the freshwater mussel toxicity data used in this assessment, the hardness‐based 1996 U.S. EPA water quality criteria, the 2005 Oklahoma water quality standards, and the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model might need to be revised to afford protection to freshwater mussels.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Bivalvia - drug effects</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper - standards</subject><subject>Copper - toxicity</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecology</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Mussels</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sublethal effects</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality standards</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALgehSOPAHkMUBiUPK2I6_jtWqLKAFpKqo3CwnnlCXbLK1k7b770m0qyIhoV7sy_POeDyEvGZwwozVH0AVUsH5CXtCFkxKXhjFzFOyAC2g0FyZI_Ii52sApqy1z8kR00Zpo9WCjKcdxVvfjn6IfUf7hjYJ89WdHzDRzZgztnTo72Mdhx0NfvA0dnS4QhowxduH0N7fjL6d3a8xBt_VSH0XaB6m06eQadMnWvfbLaaX5Fnj24yvDvcx-fHx7GL5qVh_X31enq6LujRqGgo5B6t5xWpe8cY3QkoIwZQStbVYKel1sAJ8pXWoS0AVKiYEl4qXTaVBHJN3-7rb1N-MmAe3ibnGtvUd9mN2AhjTUqlHIQfJygk_CllpBBNqbv32H3jdj6mbpnWcgdDSWDuh93tUpz7nhI3bprjxaecYuHm1DpSbV-vmzm8OBcdqg-GvPOxyAuUe3MUWd_-v5CY0_RBwxQDmWLGPxTzg_UPMp99O6emd7vLbyn39sry4_Hm-divxB3TuvRU</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>March, Ferrella A.</creator><creator>Dwyer, F. James</creator><creator>Augspurger, Tom</creator><creator>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creator><creator>Wang, Ning</creator><creator>Mebane, Christopher A.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper</title><author>March, Ferrella A. ; Dwyer, F. James ; Augspurger, Tom ; Ingersoll, Christopher G. ; Wang, Ning ; Mebane, Christopher A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Bivalvia - drug effects</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper - standards</topic><topic>Copper - toxicity</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecology</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Mussels</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sublethal effects</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality standards</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>March, Ferrella A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, F. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augspurger, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mebane, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>March, Ferrella A.</au><au>Dwyer, F. James</au><au>Augspurger, Tom</au><au>Ingersoll, Christopher G.</au><au>Wang, Ning</au><au>Mebane, Christopher A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2066</spage><epage>2074</epage><pages>2066-2074</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><abstract>The state of Oklahoma has designated several areas as freshwater mussel sanctuaries in an attempt to provide freshwater mussel species a degree of protection and to facilitate their reproduction. We evaluated the protection afforded freshwater mussels by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) hardness‐based 1996 ambient copper water quality criteria, the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model and the 2005 state of Oklahoma copper water quality standards. Both the criterion maximum concentration and criterion continuous concentration were evaluated. Published acute and chronic copper toxicity data that met American Society for Testing and Materials guidance for test acceptability were obtained for exposures conducted with glochidia or juvenile freshwater mussels. We tabulated toxicity data for glochidia and juveniles to calculate 20 species mean acute values for freshwater mussels. Generally, freshwater mussel species mean acute values were similar to those of the more sensitive species included in the U.S. EPA water quality derivation database. When added to the database of genus mean acute values used in deriving 1996 copper water quality criteria, 14 freshwater mussel genus mean acute values included 10 of the lowest 15 genus mean acute values, with three mussel species having the lowest values. Chronic exposure and sublethal effects freshwater mussel data available for four species and acute to chronic ratios were used to evaluate the criterion continuous concentration. On the basis of the freshwater mussel toxicity data used in this assessment, the hardness‐based 1996 U.S. EPA water quality criteria, the 2005 Oklahoma water quality standards, and the 2007 U.S. EPA water quality criteria based on the biotic ligand model might need to be revised to afford protection to freshwater mussels.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>17867876</pmid><doi>10.1897/06-560R.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7268
ispartof Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2007-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2066-2074
issn 0730-7268
1552-8618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30117566
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Animals
Aquatic ecosystems
Bivalvia - drug effects
Copper
Copper - standards
Copper - toxicity
Ecology
Environmental management
Environmental protection
Fish
Fresh Water
Freshwater
Freshwater ecology
Guidelines as Topic
Hardness
Mollusca
Mollusks
Mussels
Protected species
Quality standards
Risk Assessment
Sublethal effects
Toxicity
Water
Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
Water quality
Water quality standards
Wildlife conservation
title An evaluation of freshwater mussel toxicity data in the derivation of water quality guidance and standards for copper
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20freshwater%20mussel%20toxicity%20data%20in%20the%20derivation%20of%20water%20quality%20guidance%20and%20standards%20for%20copper&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=March,%20Ferrella%20A.&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2066&rft.epage=2074&rft.pages=2066-2074&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1897/06-560R.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20514011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4866-5e220972b1c2b2faf3550dd845e799eb65a7d930ab77dc40e6db13325624fb703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210375899&rft_id=info:pmid/17867876&rfr_iscdi=true