Loading…

A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.S213-S219
Main Authors: Siljander, Breana R., Chandi, Sonia K., Coxe, Francesca R., Nguyen, Joseph T., Sculco, Peter K., Chalmers, Brian P., Bostrom, Mathias P., Gausden, Elizabeth B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d51bd9f85373835fc464e1612c44483ad4183eabb26b4876be6d562af082184b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d51bd9f85373835fc464e1612c44483ad4183eabb26b4876be6d562af082184b3
container_end_page S219
container_issue 9
container_start_page S213
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 39
creator Siljander, Breana R.
Chandi, Sonia K.
Coxe, Francesca R.
Nguyen, Joseph T.
Sculco, Peter K.
Chalmers, Brian P.
Bostrom, Mathias P.
Gausden, Elizabeth B.
description Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular TFTs. A consecutive series of 113 patients (72 women, 64%, mean age 70 years [range, 26 to 96]) who had a B2 PFF were treated with either a monoblock (n = 42) or modular (n = 71) TFT stem between 2008 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 30 ± 7. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. A radiographic review was performed to assess leg length and offset restoration, endosteal cortical contact length, and stem subsidence. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine survivorship without revision, reoperation, or dislocation. There was no difference in the restoration of leg length (0.3 ± 8.0 mm) or offset (2.8 ± 8.2 mm) between the monoblock and modular cohorts (P > .05). Mean endosteal cortical contact length (47.2 ± 26.6 versus 46.7 ± 2 6.4 mm, P = .89) and stem subsidence (2.7 ± 3.5 versus 2.4 ± 3.2 mm, P = .66) did not differ. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement; Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical and Mental; visual analog score; and Lower Extremity Activity Scale) between the groups was observed. Survivorship at 2 years free from reoperation, revision, and dislocation was 90.4, 90.3, and 97.6%, respectively, for the monoblock cohort; and 84.0, 86.9, and 90.0%, respectively, for the modular cohort. No significant differences in radiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between patients treated with monoblock or modular TFTs in this large series of B2 PFFs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.046
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3014012559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540324002626</els_id><sourcerecordid>3014012559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d51bd9f85373835fc464e1612c44483ad4183eabb26b4876be6d562af082184b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEokPhBVggL9kk-F4XsWlHDCAVFbWlLC3HPmE8JPHgy0g8Em-JoyksWVk6-s5v_edrmpcEdwQT-WbXmZi3HcWUd5h1mMtHzYoIRlvFsXzcrLBSrBUcs5PmWUo7jAkRgj9tTpgS7KxCq-b3BVqHOYEt2R8A3UL0kFAY0L2ZbSgHiOiSoi91vI8h5S1kb9EGphLRJhqbS6z4XQSTwaFvPm-XuAzTPkQTf6HPYQ79GOwPdA8xlVQHrowmohs4-OTDjG4rnN6i9ehnb82IzOzQjXE-fI9mv62fXZdswwTpefNkMGOCFw_vafN18_5u_bG9uv7waX1x1VomZG6dIL07H5aCTDExWC45EEmo5ZwrZhwnioHpeyp7rs5kD9IJSc2AFSWK9-y0eX3MrYV_FkhZTz5ZGEczQyhJM0w4JlSI84rSI2rrbVKEQe-jn2pvTbBeFOmdXhTpRZHGTFdFdenVQ37pJ3D_Vv46qcC7IwC15cFD1Ml6mC04H8Fm7YL_X_4fgoKlMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3014012559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Siljander, Breana R. ; Chandi, Sonia K. ; Coxe, Francesca R. ; Nguyen, Joseph T. ; Sculco, Peter K. ; Chalmers, Brian P. ; Bostrom, Mathias P. ; Gausden, Elizabeth B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Siljander, Breana R. ; Chandi, Sonia K. ; Coxe, Francesca R. ; Nguyen, Joseph T. ; Sculco, Peter K. ; Chalmers, Brian P. ; Bostrom, Mathias P. ; Gausden, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><description>Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular TFTs. A consecutive series of 113 patients (72 women, 64%, mean age 70 years [range, 26 to 96]) who had a B2 PFF were treated with either a monoblock (n = 42) or modular (n = 71) TFT stem between 2008 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 30 ± 7. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. A radiographic review was performed to assess leg length and offset restoration, endosteal cortical contact length, and stem subsidence. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine survivorship without revision, reoperation, or dislocation. There was no difference in the restoration of leg length (0.3 ± 8.0 mm) or offset (2.8 ± 8.2 mm) between the monoblock and modular cohorts (P &gt; .05). Mean endosteal cortical contact length (47.2 ± 26.6 versus 46.7 ± 2 6.4 mm, P = .89) and stem subsidence (2.7 ± 3.5 versus 2.4 ± 3.2 mm, P = .66) did not differ. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement; Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical and Mental; visual analog score; and Lower Extremity Activity Scale) between the groups was observed. Survivorship at 2 years free from reoperation, revision, and dislocation was 90.4, 90.3, and 97.6%, respectively, for the monoblock cohort; and 84.0, 86.9, and 90.0%, respectively, for the modular cohort. No significant differences in radiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between patients treated with monoblock or modular TFTs in this large series of B2 PFFs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38537840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>modular stem ; monoblock stem ; periprosthetic femur fracture ; revision ; total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.S213-S219</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d51bd9f85373835fc464e1612c44483ad4183eabb26b4876be6d562af082184b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d51bd9f85373835fc464e1612c44483ad4183eabb26b4876be6d562af082184b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38537840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siljander, Breana R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandi, Sonia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coxe, Francesca R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Joseph T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sculco, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostrom, Mathias P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gausden, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><title>A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular TFTs. A consecutive series of 113 patients (72 women, 64%, mean age 70 years [range, 26 to 96]) who had a B2 PFF were treated with either a monoblock (n = 42) or modular (n = 71) TFT stem between 2008 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 30 ± 7. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. A radiographic review was performed to assess leg length and offset restoration, endosteal cortical contact length, and stem subsidence. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine survivorship without revision, reoperation, or dislocation. There was no difference in the restoration of leg length (0.3 ± 8.0 mm) or offset (2.8 ± 8.2 mm) between the monoblock and modular cohorts (P &gt; .05). Mean endosteal cortical contact length (47.2 ± 26.6 versus 46.7 ± 2 6.4 mm, P = .89) and stem subsidence (2.7 ± 3.5 versus 2.4 ± 3.2 mm, P = .66) did not differ. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement; Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical and Mental; visual analog score; and Lower Extremity Activity Scale) between the groups was observed. Survivorship at 2 years free from reoperation, revision, and dislocation was 90.4, 90.3, and 97.6%, respectively, for the monoblock cohort; and 84.0, 86.9, and 90.0%, respectively, for the modular cohort. No significant differences in radiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between patients treated with monoblock or modular TFTs in this large series of B2 PFFs.</description><subject>modular stem</subject><subject>monoblock stem</subject><subject>periprosthetic femur fracture</subject><subject>revision</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEokPhBVggL9kk-F4XsWlHDCAVFbWlLC3HPmE8JPHgy0g8Em-JoyksWVk6-s5v_edrmpcEdwQT-WbXmZi3HcWUd5h1mMtHzYoIRlvFsXzcrLBSrBUcs5PmWUo7jAkRgj9tTpgS7KxCq-b3BVqHOYEt2R8A3UL0kFAY0L2ZbSgHiOiSoi91vI8h5S1kb9EGphLRJhqbS6z4XQSTwaFvPm-XuAzTPkQTf6HPYQ79GOwPdA8xlVQHrowmohs4-OTDjG4rnN6i9ehnb82IzOzQjXE-fI9mv62fXZdswwTpefNkMGOCFw_vafN18_5u_bG9uv7waX1x1VomZG6dIL07H5aCTDExWC45EEmo5ZwrZhwnioHpeyp7rs5kD9IJSc2AFSWK9-y0eX3MrYV_FkhZTz5ZGEczQyhJM0w4JlSI84rSI2rrbVKEQe-jn2pvTbBeFOmdXhTpRZHGTFdFdenVQ37pJ3D_Vv46qcC7IwC15cFD1Ml6mC04H8Fm7YL_X_4fgoKlMA</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Siljander, Breana R.</creator><creator>Chandi, Sonia K.</creator><creator>Coxe, Francesca R.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Joseph T.</creator><creator>Sculco, Peter K.</creator><creator>Chalmers, Brian P.</creator><creator>Bostrom, Mathias P.</creator><creator>Gausden, Elizabeth B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes</title><author>Siljander, Breana R. ; Chandi, Sonia K. ; Coxe, Francesca R. ; Nguyen, Joseph T. ; Sculco, Peter K. ; Chalmers, Brian P. ; Bostrom, Mathias P. ; Gausden, Elizabeth B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d51bd9f85373835fc464e1612c44483ad4183eabb26b4876be6d562af082184b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>modular stem</topic><topic>monoblock stem</topic><topic>periprosthetic femur fracture</topic><topic>revision</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siljander, Breana R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandi, Sonia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coxe, Francesca R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Joseph T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sculco, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostrom, Mathias P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gausden, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siljander, Breana R.</au><au>Chandi, Sonia K.</au><au>Coxe, Francesca R.</au><au>Nguyen, Joseph T.</au><au>Sculco, Peter K.</au><au>Chalmers, Brian P.</au><au>Bostrom, Mathias P.</au><au>Gausden, Elizabeth B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>S213</spage><epage>S219</epage><pages>S213-S219</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular TFTs. A consecutive series of 113 patients (72 women, 64%, mean age 70 years [range, 26 to 96]) who had a B2 PFF were treated with either a monoblock (n = 42) or modular (n = 71) TFT stem between 2008 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 30 ± 7. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. A radiographic review was performed to assess leg length and offset restoration, endosteal cortical contact length, and stem subsidence. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine survivorship without revision, reoperation, or dislocation. There was no difference in the restoration of leg length (0.3 ± 8.0 mm) or offset (2.8 ± 8.2 mm) between the monoblock and modular cohorts (P &gt; .05). Mean endosteal cortical contact length (47.2 ± 26.6 versus 46.7 ± 2 6.4 mm, P = .89) and stem subsidence (2.7 ± 3.5 versus 2.4 ± 3.2 mm, P = .66) did not differ. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement; Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical and Mental; visual analog score; and Lower Extremity Activity Scale) between the groups was observed. Survivorship at 2 years free from reoperation, revision, and dislocation was 90.4, 90.3, and 97.6%, respectively, for the monoblock cohort; and 84.0, 86.9, and 90.0%, respectively, for the modular cohort. No significant differences in radiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between patients treated with monoblock or modular TFTs in this large series of B2 PFFs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38537840</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.046</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.S213-S219
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3014012559
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects modular stem
monoblock stem
periprosthetic femur fracture
revision
total hip arthroplasty
title A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A53%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Consecutive%20Series%20of%20Vancouver%20B2%20Periprosthetic%20Femur%20Fractures%20Treated%20With%20Contemporary%20Monoblock%20Versus%20Modular%20Revision%20Stems:%20Clinical%20and%20Radiographic%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Siljander,%20Breana%20R.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=S213&rft.epage=S219&rft.pages=S213-S219&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3014012559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-d51bd9f85373835fc464e1612c44483ad4183eabb26b4876be6d562af082184b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3014012559&rft_id=info:pmid/38537840&rfr_iscdi=true