Loading…
Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins
The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed re...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2024-10, Vol.132 (4), p.838.e1-838.e9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13 |
container_end_page | 838.e9 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 838.e1 |
container_title | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Nam, Ok Hyung Chung, Sang-Yeop Hyun, Hong-Keun Ye, Ju Ri Jeong, Yuwon Oh, Seo-Eun Chae, Yong Kwon Lee, Hyeonjong |
description | The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods.
Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005).
Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P.005).
Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034246915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391324001513</els_id><sourcerecordid>3034246915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQFaWh2ST9C0HHXrwZSZZl31pCPwKBXpqzUKRRVostbyW5sD-j_7hyNmmPhQENw3vznuYRcs1gy4B1N_vtIc3ZYSxbDrzdAq_VvSEbBoNqur5lb8kGgPNGDEyck4uc9wDQS8XekXPRy54rGDbk913044LRIp09Pcy5HFKIJcQnakc0cW0mLLvZZTpHWnb4b47eBxsq90hNdDQvyZu6Z-0ntLsKsmak1ecBUwmYV4WyS4iNCxPGHOZoxvFInxXR0YQ5xHxFzrwZM75_eS_Jw5fPP26_Nfffv97dfrpvrGCyNIoJw6XqrDPSSQQplBpQGNd737eeOykeeT-0igs2CGeAyV6AFajAC2WZuCQfTnurwZ8L5qKnkC2Oo4k4L1kLEC1vu4HJCu1OUFtvnhN6XS1PJh01A73Goff6NQ69xqGB1-oq8fpFY3mc0P2lvd6_Aj6eAFh_-itg0vn5ouhCQlu0m8P_NP4A_zaitw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3034246915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nam, Ok Hyung ; Chung, Sang-Yeop ; Hyun, Hong-Keun ; Ye, Ju Ri ; Jeong, Yuwon ; Oh, Seo-Eun ; Chae, Yong Kwon ; Lee, Hyeonjong</creator><creatorcontrib>Nam, Ok Hyung ; Chung, Sang-Yeop ; Hyun, Hong-Keun ; Ye, Ju Ri ; Jeong, Yuwon ; Oh, Seo-Eun ; Chae, Yong Kwon ; Lee, Hyeonjong</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods.
Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005).
Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005).
Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38582709</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2024-10, Vol.132 (4), p.838.e1-838.e9</ispartof><rights>2024 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8059-9305 ; 0000-0002-6386-803X ; 0000-0002-5258-7291</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38582709$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nam, Ok Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Sang-Yeop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Hong-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ju Ri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Yuwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Seo-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Yong Kwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeonjong</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods.
Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005).
Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005).
Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.]]></description><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQFaWh2ST9C0HHXrwZSZZl31pCPwKBXpqzUKRRVostbyW5sD-j_7hyNmmPhQENw3vznuYRcs1gy4B1N_vtIc3ZYSxbDrzdAq_VvSEbBoNqur5lb8kGgPNGDEyck4uc9wDQS8XekXPRy54rGDbk913044LRIp09Pcy5HFKIJcQnakc0cW0mLLvZZTpHWnb4b47eBxsq90hNdDQvyZu6Z-0ntLsKsmak1ecBUwmYV4WyS4iNCxPGHOZoxvFInxXR0YQ5xHxFzrwZM75_eS_Jw5fPP26_Nfffv97dfrpvrGCyNIoJw6XqrDPSSQQplBpQGNd737eeOykeeT-0igs2CGeAyV6AFajAC2WZuCQfTnurwZ8L5qKnkC2Oo4k4L1kLEC1vu4HJCu1OUFtvnhN6XS1PJh01A73Goff6NQ69xqGB1-oq8fpFY3mc0P2lvd6_Aj6eAFh_-itg0vn5ouhCQlu0m8P_NP4A_zaitw</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Nam, Ok Hyung</creator><creator>Chung, Sang-Yeop</creator><creator>Hyun, Hong-Keun</creator><creator>Ye, Ju Ri</creator><creator>Jeong, Yuwon</creator><creator>Oh, Seo-Eun</creator><creator>Chae, Yong Kwon</creator><creator>Lee, Hyeonjong</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-9305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-803X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-7291</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins</title><author>Nam, Ok Hyung ; Chung, Sang-Yeop ; Hyun, Hong-Keun ; Ye, Ju Ri ; Jeong, Yuwon ; Oh, Seo-Eun ; Chae, Yong Kwon ; Lee, Hyeonjong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nam, Ok Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Sang-Yeop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Hong-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ju Ri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Yuwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Seo-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Yong Kwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeonjong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nam, Ok Hyung</au><au>Chung, Sang-Yeop</au><au>Hyun, Hong-Keun</au><au>Ye, Ju Ri</au><au>Jeong, Yuwon</au><au>Oh, Seo-Eun</au><au>Chae, Yong Kwon</au><au>Lee, Hyeonjong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>838.e1</spage><epage>838.e9</epage><pages>838.e1-838.e9</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods.
Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005).
Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005).
Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38582709</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-9305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-803X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-7291</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3913 |
ispartof | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2024-10, Vol.132 (4), p.838.e1-838.e9 |
issn | 0022-3913 1097-6841 1097-6841 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034246915 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
title | Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A55%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20postprinting%20cleaning%20methods%20on%20the%20cleaning%20efficiency%20and%20surface%20and%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20three-dimensionally%20printed%20resins&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Nam,%20Ok%20Hyung&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=838.e1&rft.epage=838.e9&rft.pages=838.e1-838.e9&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034246915%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3034246915&rft_id=info:pmid/38582709&rfr_iscdi=true |