Loading…

Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins

The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2024-10, Vol.132 (4), p.838.e1-838.e9
Main Authors: Nam, Ok Hyung, Chung, Sang-Yeop, Hyun, Hong-Keun, Ye, Ju Ri, Jeong, Yuwon, Oh, Seo-Eun, Chae, Yong Kwon, Lee, Hyeonjong
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13
container_end_page 838.e9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 838.e1
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 132
creator Nam, Ok Hyung
Chung, Sang-Yeop
Hyun, Hong-Keun
Ye, Ju Ri
Jeong, Yuwon
Oh, Seo-Eun
Chae, Yong Kwon
Lee, Hyeonjong
description The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods. Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005). Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P.005). Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034246915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391324001513</els_id><sourcerecordid>3034246915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQFaWh2ST9C0HHXrwZSZZl31pCPwKBXpqzUKRRVostbyW5sD-j_7hyNmmPhQENw3vznuYRcs1gy4B1N_vtIc3ZYSxbDrzdAq_VvSEbBoNqur5lb8kGgPNGDEyck4uc9wDQS8XekXPRy54rGDbk913044LRIp09Pcy5HFKIJcQnakc0cW0mLLvZZTpHWnb4b47eBxsq90hNdDQvyZu6Z-0ntLsKsmak1ecBUwmYV4WyS4iNCxPGHOZoxvFInxXR0YQ5xHxFzrwZM75_eS_Jw5fPP26_Nfffv97dfrpvrGCyNIoJw6XqrDPSSQQplBpQGNd737eeOykeeT-0igs2CGeAyV6AFajAC2WZuCQfTnurwZ8L5qKnkC2Oo4k4L1kLEC1vu4HJCu1OUFtvnhN6XS1PJh01A73Goff6NQ69xqGB1-oq8fpFY3mc0P2lvd6_Aj6eAFh_-itg0vn5ouhCQlu0m8P_NP4A_zaitw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3034246915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nam, Ok Hyung ; Chung, Sang-Yeop ; Hyun, Hong-Keun ; Ye, Ju Ri ; Jeong, Yuwon ; Oh, Seo-Eun ; Chae, Yong Kwon ; Lee, Hyeonjong</creator><creatorcontrib>Nam, Ok Hyung ; Chung, Sang-Yeop ; Hyun, Hong-Keun ; Ye, Ju Ri ; Jeong, Yuwon ; Oh, Seo-Eun ; Chae, Yong Kwon ; Lee, Hyeonjong</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods. Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005). Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38582709</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2024-10, Vol.132 (4), p.838.e1-838.e9</ispartof><rights>2024 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8059-9305 ; 0000-0002-6386-803X ; 0000-0002-5258-7291</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38582709$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nam, Ok Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Sang-Yeop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Hong-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ju Ri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Yuwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Seo-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Yong Kwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeonjong</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods. Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005). Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.]]></description><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQFaWh2ST9C0HHXrwZSZZl31pCPwKBXpqzUKRRVostbyW5sD-j_7hyNmmPhQENw3vznuYRcs1gy4B1N_vtIc3ZYSxbDrzdAq_VvSEbBoNqur5lb8kGgPNGDEyck4uc9wDQS8XekXPRy54rGDbk913044LRIp09Pcy5HFKIJcQnakc0cW0mLLvZZTpHWnb4b47eBxsq90hNdDQvyZu6Z-0ntLsKsmak1ecBUwmYV4WyS4iNCxPGHOZoxvFInxXR0YQ5xHxFzrwZM75_eS_Jw5fPP26_Nfffv97dfrpvrGCyNIoJw6XqrDPSSQQplBpQGNd737eeOykeeT-0igs2CGeAyV6AFajAC2WZuCQfTnurwZ8L5qKnkC2Oo4k4L1kLEC1vu4HJCu1OUFtvnhN6XS1PJh01A73Goff6NQ69xqGB1-oq8fpFY3mc0P2lvd6_Aj6eAFh_-itg0vn5ouhCQlu0m8P_NP4A_zaitw</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Nam, Ok Hyung</creator><creator>Chung, Sang-Yeop</creator><creator>Hyun, Hong-Keun</creator><creator>Ye, Ju Ri</creator><creator>Jeong, Yuwon</creator><creator>Oh, Seo-Eun</creator><creator>Chae, Yong Kwon</creator><creator>Lee, Hyeonjong</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-9305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-803X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-7291</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins</title><author>Nam, Ok Hyung ; Chung, Sang-Yeop ; Hyun, Hong-Keun ; Ye, Ju Ri ; Jeong, Yuwon ; Oh, Seo-Eun ; Chae, Yong Kwon ; Lee, Hyeonjong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nam, Ok Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Sang-Yeop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Hong-Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ju Ri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Yuwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Seo-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Yong Kwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeonjong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nam, Ok Hyung</au><au>Chung, Sang-Yeop</au><au>Hyun, Hong-Keun</au><au>Ye, Ju Ri</au><au>Jeong, Yuwon</au><au>Oh, Seo-Eun</au><au>Chae, Yong Kwon</au><au>Lee, Hyeonjong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>838.e1</spage><epage>838.e9</epage><pages>838.e1-838.e9</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods. Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005). Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38582709</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-9305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6386-803X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-7291</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2024-10, Vol.132 (4), p.838.e1-838.e9
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034246915
source ScienceDirect Journals
title Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A55%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20postprinting%20cleaning%20methods%20on%20the%20cleaning%20efficiency%20and%20surface%20and%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20three-dimensionally%20printed%20resins&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Nam,%20Ok%20Hyung&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=838.e1&rft.epage=838.e9&rft.pages=838.e1-838.e9&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034246915%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-713a2576cda5d5e053779e3ad8ff84f2d53b2894723193da015830c3e70f37c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3034246915&rft_id=info:pmid/38582709&rfr_iscdi=true