Gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with chronic ankle instability and healthy controls: A statistical parametric mapping analysis

Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with changes in gait biomechanics which may be related to chronic dysfunction. Traditional statistical models may be limited in their ability to assess the complex 3D movement of the lower extremity during gait. Multivariate analysis of the lower extremi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2024-06, Vol.59, p.102089, Article 102089
Main Authors: Herb, CC, Custer, L., Blemker, S., Saliba, S., Hart, J., Hertel, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biomechanics
Gait
Joint dysfunction
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-6e0838d68cde0c5ebcfae41fd2a434b4897c2d260c57950afe07aa46a0d54cf33
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102089
container_title Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland)
container_volume 59
creator Herb, CC
Custer, L.
Blemker, S.
Saliba, S.
Hart, J.
Hertel, J.
description Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with changes in gait biomechanics which may be related to chronic dysfunction. Traditional statistical models may be limited in their ability to assess the complex 3D movement of the lower extremity during gait. Multivariate analysis of the lower extremity kinematics may reveal unique biomechanical differences associated with CAI. Research Question: Do patients with CAI differ from healthy controls in their lower extremity biomechanics and GRF when comparing 3D biomechanics? Thirty-nine young, active adults participated in this study. Data was collected using a 3D motion analysis system while patients walked and jogged. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to explore 3D GRF, kinematics and kinetics of the of the lower extremity of CAI and healthy patients. During walking, patients with CAI had greater inversion from 68–100% of gait cycle (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foot.2024.102089
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3035540134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0958259224000221</els_id><sourcerecordid>3035540134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-6e0838d68cde0c5ebcfae41fd2a434b4897c2d260c57950afe07aa46a0d54cf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9OGzEQxq2qqITAC_RQ7bGXTb3-s9lFvSBUAhISFzhbE3u2cfCut7YD2ifgtesk0GNP1sz8vk_j-Qj5WtFFRav6x3bReZ8WjDKRG4w27ScyqyRnJWtr_pnMaCubksmWnZKzGLeUUskY-0JOeSNbLqt2Rt5WYFPxbAfsIVkdCxjMoTwUdijG3MYhxeLVpk2hN8EPVmfq2WEexwRr62yaDroNgkubqdB-SMG7eFlcFZlINmY3cNkrQI8pZIMextEOv7MM3BRtPCcnHbiIF-_vnDzd_Hq8vi3vH1Z311f3pc6bp7JG2vDG1I02SLXEte4ARdUZBoKLtWjapWaG1Xm2bCWFDukSQNRAjRS643xOvh99x-D_7DAm1duo0TkY0O-i4pRLKWjFRUbZEdXBxxiwU2OwPYRJVVTtA1BbtQ9A7QNQxwCy6Nu7_27do_kn-bh4Bn4eAcy_fLEYVNT5wBqNDaiTMt7-z_8vC3uapw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3035540134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with chronic ankle instability and healthy controls: A statistical parametric mapping analysis</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Herb, CC ; Custer, L. ; Blemker, S. ; Saliba, S. ; Hart, J. ; Hertel, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herb, CC ; Custer, L. ; Blemker, S. ; Saliba, S. ; Hart, J. ; Hertel, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with changes in gait biomechanics which may be related to chronic dysfunction. Traditional statistical models may be limited in their ability to assess the complex 3D movement of the lower extremity during gait. Multivariate analysis of the lower extremity kinematics may reveal unique biomechanical differences associated with CAI. Research Question: Do patients with CAI differ from healthy controls in their lower extremity biomechanics and GRF when comparing 3D biomechanics? Thirty-nine young, active adults participated in this study. Data was collected using a 3D motion analysis system while patients walked and jogged. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to explore 3D GRF, kinematics and kinetics of the of the lower extremity of CAI and healthy patients. During walking, patients with CAI had greater inversion from 68–100% of gait cycle (p &lt; 0.001, mean difference=3.2°). During jogging, patients with CAI had greater inversion from 20–92% (p &lt; 0.001, mean difference=4.6°). Greater plantar flexion moments were found from 65–71% (p = 0.05, mean difference=347.4Nm/kg) and greater eversion moments were found from 95–100% (p = 0.03, mean difference=74.6Nm/kg) in the CAI group. No differences in GRF were found. Significance: Greater inversion may present a potentially injurious position. A faulty position of the rearfoot may require greater muscle function in order to correct the position of the joint resulting in greater eversion moments at the ankle. However, this kinetic change does not appear to correct the ankle position. •Statistical parametric mapping analyzing 3D biomechanics of human movement.•Differences were identified in the kinematics and kinetics in patients with CAI.•The magnitude and timing of differences was unique compared to previous findings.•SPM should be considered when analyzing complex 3D data sets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-2592</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2024.102089</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38593519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomechanics ; Gait ; Joint dysfunction</subject><ispartof>Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2024-06, Vol.59, p.102089, Article 102089</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-6e0838d68cde0c5ebcfae41fd2a434b4897c2d260c57950afe07aa46a0d54cf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38593519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herb, CC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Custer, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blemker, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertel, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with chronic ankle instability and healthy controls: A statistical parametric mapping analysis</title><title>Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland)</title><addtitle>Foot (Edinb)</addtitle><description>Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with changes in gait biomechanics which may be related to chronic dysfunction. Traditional statistical models may be limited in their ability to assess the complex 3D movement of the lower extremity during gait. Multivariate analysis of the lower extremity kinematics may reveal unique biomechanical differences associated with CAI. Research Question: Do patients with CAI differ from healthy controls in their lower extremity biomechanics and GRF when comparing 3D biomechanics? Thirty-nine young, active adults participated in this study. Data was collected using a 3D motion analysis system while patients walked and jogged. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to explore 3D GRF, kinematics and kinetics of the of the lower extremity of CAI and healthy patients. During walking, patients with CAI had greater inversion from 68–100% of gait cycle (p &lt; 0.001, mean difference=3.2°). During jogging, patients with CAI had greater inversion from 20–92% (p &lt; 0.001, mean difference=4.6°). Greater plantar flexion moments were found from 65–71% (p = 0.05, mean difference=347.4Nm/kg) and greater eversion moments were found from 95–100% (p = 0.03, mean difference=74.6Nm/kg) in the CAI group. No differences in GRF were found. Significance: Greater inversion may present a potentially injurious position. A faulty position of the rearfoot may require greater muscle function in order to correct the position of the joint resulting in greater eversion moments at the ankle. However, this kinetic change does not appear to correct the ankle position. •Statistical parametric mapping analyzing 3D biomechanics of human movement.•Differences were identified in the kinematics and kinetics in patients with CAI.•The magnitude and timing of differences was unique compared to previous findings.•SPM should be considered when analyzing complex 3D data sets.</description><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Joint dysfunction</subject><issn>0958-2592</issn><issn>1532-2963</issn><issn>1532-2963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9OGzEQxq2qqITAC_RQ7bGXTb3-s9lFvSBUAhISFzhbE3u2cfCut7YD2ifgtesk0GNP1sz8vk_j-Qj5WtFFRav6x3bReZ8WjDKRG4w27ScyqyRnJWtr_pnMaCubksmWnZKzGLeUUskY-0JOeSNbLqt2Rt5WYFPxbAfsIVkdCxjMoTwUdijG3MYhxeLVpk2hN8EPVmfq2WEexwRr62yaDroNgkubqdB-SMG7eFlcFZlINmY3cNkrQI8pZIMextEOv7MM3BRtPCcnHbiIF-_vnDzd_Hq8vi3vH1Z311f3pc6bp7JG2vDG1I02SLXEte4ARdUZBoKLtWjapWaG1Xm2bCWFDukSQNRAjRS643xOvh99x-D_7DAm1duo0TkY0O-i4pRLKWjFRUbZEdXBxxiwU2OwPYRJVVTtA1BbtQ9A7QNQxwCy6Nu7_27do_kn-bh4Bn4eAcy_fLEYVNT5wBqNDaiTMt7-z_8vC3uapw</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Herb, CC</creator><creator>Custer, L.</creator><creator>Blemker, S.</creator><creator>Saliba, S.</creator><creator>Hart, J.</creator><creator>Hertel, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with chronic ankle instability and healthy controls: A statistical parametric mapping analysis</title><author>Herb, CC ; Custer, L. ; Blemker, S. ; Saliba, S. ; Hart, J. ; Hertel, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-6e0838d68cde0c5ebcfae41fd2a434b4897c2d260c57950afe07aa46a0d54cf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Joint dysfunction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herb, CC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Custer, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blemker, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertel, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herb, CC</au><au>Custer, L.</au><au>Blemker, S.</au><au>Saliba, S.</au><au>Hart, J.</au><au>Hertel, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with chronic ankle instability and healthy controls: A statistical parametric mapping analysis</atitle><jtitle>Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle><addtitle>Foot (Edinb)</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>102089</spage><pages>102089-</pages><artnum>102089</artnum><issn>0958-2592</issn><issn>1532-2963</issn><eissn>1532-2963</eissn><abstract>Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with changes in gait biomechanics which may be related to chronic dysfunction. Traditional statistical models may be limited in their ability to assess the complex 3D movement of the lower extremity during gait. Multivariate analysis of the lower extremity kinematics may reveal unique biomechanical differences associated with CAI. Research Question: Do patients with CAI differ from healthy controls in their lower extremity biomechanics and GRF when comparing 3D biomechanics? Thirty-nine young, active adults participated in this study. Data was collected using a 3D motion analysis system while patients walked and jogged. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to explore 3D GRF, kinematics and kinetics of the of the lower extremity of CAI and healthy patients. During walking, patients with CAI had greater inversion from 68–100% of gait cycle (p &lt; 0.001, mean difference=3.2°). During jogging, patients with CAI had greater inversion from 20–92% (p &lt; 0.001, mean difference=4.6°). Greater plantar flexion moments were found from 65–71% (p = 0.05, mean difference=347.4Nm/kg) and greater eversion moments were found from 95–100% (p = 0.03, mean difference=74.6Nm/kg) in the CAI group. No differences in GRF were found. Significance: Greater inversion may present a potentially injurious position. A faulty position of the rearfoot may require greater muscle function in order to correct the position of the joint resulting in greater eversion moments at the ankle. However, this kinetic change does not appear to correct the ankle position. •Statistical parametric mapping analyzing 3D biomechanics of human movement.•Differences were identified in the kinematics and kinetics in patients with CAI.•The magnitude and timing of differences was unique compared to previous findings.•SPM should be considered when analyzing complex 3D data sets.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38593519</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.foot.2024.102089</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-2592
ispartof Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2024-06, Vol.59, p.102089, Article 102089
issn 0958-2592
1532-2963
1532-2963
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3035540134
source Elsevier
subjects Biomechanics
Gait
Joint dysfunction
title Gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with chronic ankle instability and healthy controls: A statistical parametric mapping analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A13%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gait%20kinematics%20and%20kinetics%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20ankle%20instability%20and%20healthy%20controls:%20A%20statistical%20parametric%20mapping%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Foot%20(Edinburgh,%20Scotland)&rft.au=Herb,%20CC&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=102089&rft.pages=102089-&rft.artnum=102089&rft.issn=0958-2592&rft.eissn=1532-2963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foot.2024.102089&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3035540134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-6e0838d68cde0c5ebcfae41fd2a434b4897c2d260c57950afe07aa46a0d54cf33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3035540134&rft_id=info:pmid/38593519&rfr_iscdi=true