In Vitro Study on the Influence of the Buccal Surface Convexity of the Tooth upon Enamel Loss after Bracket Removal

• Published in: Materials 2024-04, Vol.17 (7), p.1519
• Main Authors: Pallarés-Serrano, Sandra, Pallarés-Serrano, Alba, Pallarés-Serrano, Antonio, Pallarés-Sabater, Antonio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adhesives; Brackets; Composite materials; Convexity; Dental enamel; High speed; Low speed; Mathematical analysis; Orthodontics; Photographic industry; Polishing; Sample size; Silicones; Statistical analysis; Teeth; Tungsten carbide
• ISSN: 1996-1944; 1996-1944
• DOI: 10.3390/ma17071519

Polishing after the removal of brackets is the final step in orthodontic treatment. It is simple to perform, though some studies have reported that polishing causes damage to the enamel surface. An in vitro study was made of the influence of the buccal surface convexity of the tooth upon possible enamel loss when the remaining resin and adhesive are removed after bracket decementing using two different polishing modes: a tungsten carbide bur at low and high speeds. The convexity of the buccal surface was quantified in 30 incisors and 30 premolars. A stereoscopic microscope was used to obtain photographs of the profile of the crown, and Image J software was used to calculate convexity by dividing the length of a line from the cementoenamel junction to the incisal margin by another line from the mentioned junction to the maximum convexity of the buccal surface. Brackets were cemented on all the teeth and were decemented 24 h later. In both groups, the residual composite was removed with a tungsten carbide bur at a low speed in one-half of the teeth and at a high speed in the other half. The buccal surface of each tooth was then photographed again, and the convexity was calculated and compared against the baseline value. The difference between the two values were taken to represent the enamel loss. The convexity of the premolars was significantly greater than that of the incisors, but this did not result in greater enamel loss when the same polishing mode was used. However, the tungsten carbide bur at a high speed proved more aggressive, causing significantly greater enamel loss than when used at a low speed.