Loading…

Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review

Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical medicine 2024-04, Vol.13 (7), p.2122
Main Authors: Huang, Chuan-Ching, Fitts, Jamal, Huie, David, Bhowmick, Deb A, Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-649315f2fd526737fbbabaee24ab558b78320b917c95bb8969749137e152bcf63
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2122
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 13
creator Huang, Chuan-Ching
Fitts, Jamal
Huie, David
Bhowmick, Deb A
Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M
description Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery. As scientific evidence accumulates, the efficacy and safety of cervical endoscopic spine surgery are continually affirmed. Both anterior and posterior endoscopic approaches have surfaced as viable alternative treatments for various cervical spine pathologies. Newer techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted fusion, the anterior transcorporeal approach, and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression, have been developed to enhance clinical outcomes and broaden surgical indications. Despite its advantages, this approach faces challenges, including a steep learning curve, increased radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients, and a relative limitation in addressing multi-level pathologies. However, the future of cervical endoscopic spine surgery is promising, with potential enhancements in clinical outcomes and safety on the horizon. This progress is fueled by integrating advanced imaging and navigation technologies, applying regional anesthesia for improved and facilitated postoperative recovery, and incorporating cutting-edge technologies, such as augmented reality. With these advancements, cervical endoscopic spine surgery is poised to broaden its scope in treating cervical spine pathologies while maintaining the benefits of minimized tissue damage and rapid recovery.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm13072122
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3038440314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A790019551</galeid><sourcerecordid>A790019551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-649315f2fd526737fbbabaee24ab558b78320b917c95bb8969749137e152bcf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd1rFDEUxYNYbKl98l0CvggyNR8zk4lvy3arhVLF6vOQZG6WLDPJmkxW-t-boVVbMfch94bfPRxyEHpFyTnnkrzfmYlyIhhl7Bk6YUSIivCOP3_UH6OzlHaknK6rGRUv0DHvWlomcYLc5hDGPLvgcbB4DfHgjBrxxg8hmbB3Bt_unQd8m-MW4t0HvM4xgp_xlxi2EVLCyg_4Ms85Ar5wEcyilaoVvlExqtkdAH-Fg4OfL9GRVWOCs4f7FH2_3Hxbf6quP3-8Wq-uK8OFnKu2lpw2ltmhYa3gwmqttAJgtdJN02nRcUa0pMLIRutOtlLUknIBtGHa2Jaforf3uvsYfmRIcz-5ZGAclYeQU8_Ln9Q14bQu6Jt_0F3I0Rd3CyXqxUD3l9qqEXrnbZijMotovxKSECqbhhbq_D9UqQEmZ4IH68r7k4V39wsmhpQi2H4f3aTiXU9Jv2TbP8q20K8frGY9wfCH_Z0k_wVHhZxk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3037426738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huang, Chuan-Ching ; Fitts, Jamal ; Huie, David ; Bhowmick, Deb A ; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chuan-Ching ; Fitts, Jamal ; Huie, David ; Bhowmick, Deb A ; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M</creatorcontrib><description>Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery. As scientific evidence accumulates, the efficacy and safety of cervical endoscopic spine surgery are continually affirmed. Both anterior and posterior endoscopic approaches have surfaced as viable alternative treatments for various cervical spine pathologies. Newer techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted fusion, the anterior transcorporeal approach, and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression, have been developed to enhance clinical outcomes and broaden surgical indications. Despite its advantages, this approach faces challenges, including a steep learning curve, increased radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients, and a relative limitation in addressing multi-level pathologies. However, the future of cervical endoscopic spine surgery is promising, with potential enhancements in clinical outcomes and safety on the horizon. This progress is fueled by integrating advanced imaging and navigation technologies, applying regional anesthesia for improved and facilitated postoperative recovery, and incorporating cutting-edge technologies, such as augmented reality. With these advancements, cervical endoscopic spine surgery is poised to broaden its scope in treating cervical spine pathologies while maintaining the benefits of minimized tissue damage and rapid recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38610887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Back surgery ; Care and treatment ; Clinical outcomes ; Diagnosis ; Endoscopy ; Hospitals ; Neck pain ; Spinal cord compression ; Spine ; Surgery ; Surgical apparatus &amp; instruments</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-04, Vol.13 (7), p.2122</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-649315f2fd526737fbbabaee24ab558b78320b917c95bb8969749137e152bcf63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7151-2861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3037426738/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3037426738?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38610887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chuan-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitts, Jamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huie, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhowmick, Deb A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery. As scientific evidence accumulates, the efficacy and safety of cervical endoscopic spine surgery are continually affirmed. Both anterior and posterior endoscopic approaches have surfaced as viable alternative treatments for various cervical spine pathologies. Newer techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted fusion, the anterior transcorporeal approach, and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression, have been developed to enhance clinical outcomes and broaden surgical indications. Despite its advantages, this approach faces challenges, including a steep learning curve, increased radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients, and a relative limitation in addressing multi-level pathologies. However, the future of cervical endoscopic spine surgery is promising, with potential enhancements in clinical outcomes and safety on the horizon. This progress is fueled by integrating advanced imaging and navigation technologies, applying regional anesthesia for improved and facilitated postoperative recovery, and incorporating cutting-edge technologies, such as augmented reality. With these advancements, cervical endoscopic spine surgery is poised to broaden its scope in treating cervical spine pathologies while maintaining the benefits of minimized tissue damage and rapid recovery.</description><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Neck pain</subject><subject>Spinal cord compression</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical apparatus &amp; instruments</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkd1rFDEUxYNYbKl98l0CvggyNR8zk4lvy3arhVLF6vOQZG6WLDPJmkxW-t-boVVbMfch94bfPRxyEHpFyTnnkrzfmYlyIhhl7Bk6YUSIivCOP3_UH6OzlHaknK6rGRUv0DHvWlomcYLc5hDGPLvgcbB4DfHgjBrxxg8hmbB3Bt_unQd8m-MW4t0HvM4xgp_xlxi2EVLCyg_4Ms85Ar5wEcyilaoVvlExqtkdAH-Fg4OfL9GRVWOCs4f7FH2_3Hxbf6quP3-8Wq-uK8OFnKu2lpw2ltmhYa3gwmqttAJgtdJN02nRcUa0pMLIRutOtlLUknIBtGHa2Jaforf3uvsYfmRIcz-5ZGAclYeQU8_Ln9Q14bQu6Jt_0F3I0Rd3CyXqxUD3l9qqEXrnbZijMotovxKSECqbhhbq_D9UqQEmZ4IH68r7k4V39wsmhpQi2H4f3aTiXU9Jv2TbP8q20K8frGY9wfCH_Z0k_wVHhZxk</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Huang, Chuan-Ching</creator><creator>Fitts, Jamal</creator><creator>Huie, David</creator><creator>Bhowmick, Deb A</creator><creator>Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-2861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review</title><author>Huang, Chuan-Ching ; Fitts, Jamal ; Huie, David ; Bhowmick, Deb A ; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-649315f2fd526737fbbabaee24ab558b78320b917c95bb8969749137e152bcf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Neck pain</topic><topic>Spinal cord compression</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical apparatus &amp; instruments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chuan-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitts, Jamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huie, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhowmick, Deb A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Chuan-Ching</au><au>Fitts, Jamal</au><au>Huie, David</au><au>Bhowmick, Deb A</au><au>Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2122</spage><pages>2122-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery. As scientific evidence accumulates, the efficacy and safety of cervical endoscopic spine surgery are continually affirmed. Both anterior and posterior endoscopic approaches have surfaced as viable alternative treatments for various cervical spine pathologies. Newer techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted fusion, the anterior transcorporeal approach, and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression, have been developed to enhance clinical outcomes and broaden surgical indications. Despite its advantages, this approach faces challenges, including a steep learning curve, increased radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients, and a relative limitation in addressing multi-level pathologies. However, the future of cervical endoscopic spine surgery is promising, with potential enhancements in clinical outcomes and safety on the horizon. This progress is fueled by integrating advanced imaging and navigation technologies, applying regional anesthesia for improved and facilitated postoperative recovery, and incorporating cutting-edge technologies, such as augmented reality. With these advancements, cervical endoscopic spine surgery is poised to broaden its scope in treating cervical spine pathologies while maintaining the benefits of minimized tissue damage and rapid recovery.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38610887</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13072122</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-2861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-04, Vol.13 (7), p.2122
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3038440314
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Back surgery
Care and treatment
Clinical outcomes
Diagnosis
Endoscopy
Hospitals
Neck pain
Spinal cord compression
Spine
Surgery
Surgical apparatus & instruments
title Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T23%3A52%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20Cervical%20Endoscopic%20Spine%20Surgery:%20Current%20Progress%20and%20Future%20Directions-A%20Narrative%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Huang,%20Chuan-Ching&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2122&rft.pages=2122-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13072122&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA790019551%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-649315f2fd526737fbbabaee24ab558b78320b917c95bb8969749137e152bcf63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3037426738&rft_id=info:pmid/38610887&rft_galeid=A790019551&rfr_iscdi=true