Loading…

Assessment of management reasoning: Design considerations drawn from analysis of simulated outpatient encounters

Management reasoning is a distinct subset of clinical reasoning. We sought to explore features to be considered when designing assessments of management reasoning. This is a hybrid empirical research study, narrative review, and expert perspective. In 2021, we reviewed and discussed 10 videos of sim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical teacher 2024-04, p.1-15
Main Authors: Cook, David A, Durning, Steven J, Stephenson, Christopher R, Gruppen, Larry D, Lineberry, Matt
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8aabbbc527f73804edfcce39d463e9fa4c66664856c41debebb8e61eb7b0f1e33
container_end_page 15
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Medical teacher
container_volume
creator Cook, David A
Durning, Steven J
Stephenson, Christopher R
Gruppen, Larry D
Lineberry, Matt
description Management reasoning is a distinct subset of clinical reasoning. We sought to explore features to be considered when designing assessments of management reasoning. This is a hybrid empirical research study, narrative review, and expert perspective. In 2021, we reviewed and discussed 10 videos of simulated (staged) physician-patient encounters, actively seeking actions that offered insights into assessment of management reasoning. We analyzed our own observations in conjunction with literature on clinical reasoning assessment, using a constant comparative qualitative approach. Distinguishing features of management reasoning that will influence its assessment include management scripts, shared decision-making, process knowledge, illness-specific knowledge, and tailoring of the encounter and management plan. Performance domains that merit special consideration include communication, integration of patient preferences, adherence to the management script, and prognostication. Additional facets of encounter variation include the clinical problem, clinical and nonclinical patient characteristics (including preferences, values, and resources), team/system characteristics, and encounter features. We cataloged several relevant assessment approaches including written/computer-based, simulation-based, and workplace-based modalities, and a variety of novel response formats. Assessment of management reasoning could be improved with attention to the performance domains, facets of variation, and variety of approaches herein identified.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2337251
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040321071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3040321071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8aabbbc527f73804edfcce39d463e9fa4c66664856c41debebb8e61eb7b0f1e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCSAv2aT4lRe7irdUiQ1I3UW2M6mCEjt4EqH-PQltmY3H0rl3pEPINWdLzjJ2x7gSPM43S8GEWgopUxHzEzLnKkkinqWbUzKfmGiCZuQC8YsxFud5fE5mMktEygSbk26FCIgtuJ76irba6S38_QJo9K5223v6CFhvHbXeYV1C0H09brQM-sfRKviWjqlmhzVOFVi3Q6N7KKkf-m5kpzJw1g-uh4CX5KzSDcLV4V2Qz-enj4fXaP3-8vawWkdWxGkfZVobY2ws0iqVGVNQVtaCzEuVSMgrrWwyjsrixCpeggFjMkg4mNSwioOUC3K77-2C_x4A-6Kt0ULTaAd-wEIyxaTgLOUjGu9RGzxigKroQt3qsCs4KybZxVF2MckuDrLH3M3hxGBaKP9TR7vyFyHcflo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3040321071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of management reasoning: Design considerations drawn from analysis of simulated outpatient encounters</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Cook, David A ; Durning, Steven J ; Stephenson, Christopher R ; Gruppen, Larry D ; Lineberry, Matt</creator><creatorcontrib>Cook, David A ; Durning, Steven J ; Stephenson, Christopher R ; Gruppen, Larry D ; Lineberry, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>Management reasoning is a distinct subset of clinical reasoning. We sought to explore features to be considered when designing assessments of management reasoning. This is a hybrid empirical research study, narrative review, and expert perspective. In 2021, we reviewed and discussed 10 videos of simulated (staged) physician-patient encounters, actively seeking actions that offered insights into assessment of management reasoning. We analyzed our own observations in conjunction with literature on clinical reasoning assessment, using a constant comparative qualitative approach. Distinguishing features of management reasoning that will influence its assessment include management scripts, shared decision-making, process knowledge, illness-specific knowledge, and tailoring of the encounter and management plan. Performance domains that merit special consideration include communication, integration of patient preferences, adherence to the management script, and prognostication. Additional facets of encounter variation include the clinical problem, clinical and nonclinical patient characteristics (including preferences, values, and resources), team/system characteristics, and encounter features. We cataloged several relevant assessment approaches including written/computer-based, simulation-based, and workplace-based modalities, and a variety of novel response formats. Assessment of management reasoning could be improved with attention to the performance domains, facets of variation, and variety of approaches herein identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-159X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-187X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2337251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38627020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Medical teacher, 2024-04, p.1-15</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8aabbbc527f73804edfcce39d463e9fa4c66664856c41debebb8e61eb7b0f1e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2107-0126 ; 0000-0002-0177-5305 ; 0000-0001-8537-392X ; 0000-0003-2383-4633 ; 0000-0001-5223-1597</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38627020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cook, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durning, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephenson, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruppen, Larry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lineberry, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of management reasoning: Design considerations drawn from analysis of simulated outpatient encounters</title><title>Medical teacher</title><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><description>Management reasoning is a distinct subset of clinical reasoning. We sought to explore features to be considered when designing assessments of management reasoning. This is a hybrid empirical research study, narrative review, and expert perspective. In 2021, we reviewed and discussed 10 videos of simulated (staged) physician-patient encounters, actively seeking actions that offered insights into assessment of management reasoning. We analyzed our own observations in conjunction with literature on clinical reasoning assessment, using a constant comparative qualitative approach. Distinguishing features of management reasoning that will influence its assessment include management scripts, shared decision-making, process knowledge, illness-specific knowledge, and tailoring of the encounter and management plan. Performance domains that merit special consideration include communication, integration of patient preferences, adherence to the management script, and prognostication. Additional facets of encounter variation include the clinical problem, clinical and nonclinical patient characteristics (including preferences, values, and resources), team/system characteristics, and encounter features. We cataloged several relevant assessment approaches including written/computer-based, simulation-based, and workplace-based modalities, and a variety of novel response formats. Assessment of management reasoning could be improved with attention to the performance domains, facets of variation, and variety of approaches herein identified.</description><issn>0142-159X</issn><issn>1466-187X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCSAv2aT4lRe7irdUiQ1I3UW2M6mCEjt4EqH-PQltmY3H0rl3pEPINWdLzjJ2x7gSPM43S8GEWgopUxHzEzLnKkkinqWbUzKfmGiCZuQC8YsxFud5fE5mMktEygSbk26FCIgtuJ76irba6S38_QJo9K5223v6CFhvHbXeYV1C0H09brQM-sfRKviWjqlmhzVOFVi3Q6N7KKkf-m5kpzJw1g-uh4CX5KzSDcLV4V2Qz-enj4fXaP3-8vawWkdWxGkfZVobY2ws0iqVGVNQVtaCzEuVSMgrrWwyjsrixCpeggFjMkg4mNSwioOUC3K77-2C_x4A-6Kt0ULTaAd-wEIyxaTgLOUjGu9RGzxigKroQt3qsCs4KybZxVF2MckuDrLH3M3hxGBaKP9TR7vyFyHcflo</recordid><startdate>20240416</startdate><enddate>20240416</enddate><creator>Cook, David A</creator><creator>Durning, Steven J</creator><creator>Stephenson, Christopher R</creator><creator>Gruppen, Larry D</creator><creator>Lineberry, Matt</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2107-0126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-5305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-392X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-4633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5223-1597</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240416</creationdate><title>Assessment of management reasoning: Design considerations drawn from analysis of simulated outpatient encounters</title><author>Cook, David A ; Durning, Steven J ; Stephenson, Christopher R ; Gruppen, Larry D ; Lineberry, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8aabbbc527f73804edfcce39d463e9fa4c66664856c41debebb8e61eb7b0f1e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cook, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durning, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephenson, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruppen, Larry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lineberry, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cook, David A</au><au>Durning, Steven J</au><au>Stephenson, Christopher R</au><au>Gruppen, Larry D</au><au>Lineberry, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of management reasoning: Design considerations drawn from analysis of simulated outpatient encounters</atitle><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><date>2024-04-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>0142-159X</issn><eissn>1466-187X</eissn><abstract>Management reasoning is a distinct subset of clinical reasoning. We sought to explore features to be considered when designing assessments of management reasoning. This is a hybrid empirical research study, narrative review, and expert perspective. In 2021, we reviewed and discussed 10 videos of simulated (staged) physician-patient encounters, actively seeking actions that offered insights into assessment of management reasoning. We analyzed our own observations in conjunction with literature on clinical reasoning assessment, using a constant comparative qualitative approach. Distinguishing features of management reasoning that will influence its assessment include management scripts, shared decision-making, process knowledge, illness-specific knowledge, and tailoring of the encounter and management plan. Performance domains that merit special consideration include communication, integration of patient preferences, adherence to the management script, and prognostication. Additional facets of encounter variation include the clinical problem, clinical and nonclinical patient characteristics (including preferences, values, and resources), team/system characteristics, and encounter features. We cataloged several relevant assessment approaches including written/computer-based, simulation-based, and workplace-based modalities, and a variety of novel response formats. Assessment of management reasoning could be improved with attention to the performance domains, facets of variation, and variety of approaches herein identified.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38627020</pmid><doi>10.1080/0142159X.2024.2337251</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2107-0126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-5305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-392X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-4633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5223-1597</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-159X
ispartof Medical teacher, 2024-04, p.1-15
issn 0142-159X
1466-187X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040321071
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
title Assessment of management reasoning: Design considerations drawn from analysis of simulated outpatient encounters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A49%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20management%20reasoning:%20Design%20considerations%20drawn%20from%20analysis%20of%20simulated%20outpatient%20encounters&rft.jtitle=Medical%20teacher&rft.au=Cook,%20David%20A&rft.date=2024-04-16&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=0142-159X&rft.eissn=1466-187X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2337251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3040321071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8aabbbc527f73804edfcce39d463e9fa4c66664856c41debebb8e61eb7b0f1e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3040321071&rft_id=info:pmid/38627020&rfr_iscdi=true