Loading…

How to finance green investments? The role of public debt

Economic costs are a central political obstacle to investing in climate change mitigation and adaptation measures. Several studies now demonstrate that as costs increase, voters are less likely to support green initiatives. In this paper we argue that opposition to government green investments is co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy policy 2024-01, Vol.184, p.113899, Article 113899
Main Authors: Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw, Collewet, Marion, DiGiuseppe, Matthew, Vrijburg, Hendrik
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b880db52cce2332e8b5241bbde46e790a40ec0bb42c10fa392165536b91862393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b880db52cce2332e8b5241bbde46e790a40ec0bb42c10fa392165536b91862393
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 113899
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 184
creator Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw
Collewet, Marion
DiGiuseppe, Matthew
Vrijburg, Hendrik
description Economic costs are a central political obstacle to investing in climate change mitigation and adaptation measures. Several studies now demonstrate that as costs increase, voters are less likely to support green initiatives. In this paper we argue that opposition to government green investments is conditional on the method of financing. Notably, because public debt shifts the burden of investments into the future, it may face less public opposition than broad based taxes that require an immediate sacrifice. To test this proposition, we fielded a preregistered conjoint survey experiment on nationally representative samples in one highly indebted (Italy) and one fiscally sound country (The Netherlands). We find debt financing increases voter support for green financing by up to 10 percentage points relative to broad-based taxes. However, we find carbon taxes and wealth taxes are most preferred. These findings demonstrate that credit market tools, like green bonds and debt for climate swaps, are likely politically efficient and not just economically efficient. Where investments are already financed with debt, the findings suggest that political communication can limit a political backlash to green investments. Most importantly, the findings show that the political opposition to paying for green investments can be circumvented. •Public debt is a preferred financing tool for green investments.•Public debt is particularly preferred by those who care about future generations.•Public debt is also preferred by those who are fiscally less conservative.•The most preferred financing mode of green investments are wealth taxes.•To boost support for green policies, states can launch apt communication campaigns.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113899
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040432660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421523004846</els_id><sourcerecordid>3040432660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b880db52cce2332e8b5241bbde46e790a40ec0bb42c10fa392165536b91862393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhj2ARCn8AhaPLAnnj5h4QAhVQJEqsZTZip0LuErjYCdF_HtSwsx0N7zPq7uHkCsGOQOmbnY5dn1ocw5c5IyJUusTsgABLJOcFWfkPKUdAMhSywXR6_BFh0Ab31WdQ_oeETvquwOmYY_dkO7p9gNpDC3S0NB-tK13tEY7XJDTpmoTXv7NJXl7etyu1tnm9fll9bDJnAQ1ZLYsobYFdw65EBzLaZfM2hqlwlsNlQR0YK3kjkFTCc2ZKgqhrGal4kKLJbmee_sYPsfpLLP3yWHbVh2GMRkBEqTgSsEUFXPUxZBSxMb00e-r-G0YmKMcszO_csxRjpnlTNTdTOH0xcFjNMl5nGTUPqIbTB38v_wP2E5uxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3040432660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to finance green investments? The role of public debt</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw ; Collewet, Marion ; DiGiuseppe, Matthew ; Vrijburg, Hendrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw ; Collewet, Marion ; DiGiuseppe, Matthew ; Vrijburg, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><description>Economic costs are a central political obstacle to investing in climate change mitigation and adaptation measures. Several studies now demonstrate that as costs increase, voters are less likely to support green initiatives. In this paper we argue that opposition to government green investments is conditional on the method of financing. Notably, because public debt shifts the burden of investments into the future, it may face less public opposition than broad based taxes that require an immediate sacrifice. To test this proposition, we fielded a preregistered conjoint survey experiment on nationally representative samples in one highly indebted (Italy) and one fiscally sound country (The Netherlands). We find debt financing increases voter support for green financing by up to 10 percentage points relative to broad-based taxes. However, we find carbon taxes and wealth taxes are most preferred. These findings demonstrate that credit market tools, like green bonds and debt for climate swaps, are likely politically efficient and not just economically efficient. Where investments are already financed with debt, the findings suggest that political communication can limit a political backlash to green investments. Most importantly, the findings show that the political opposition to paying for green investments can be circumvented. •Public debt is a preferred financing tool for green investments.•Public debt is particularly preferred by those who care about future generations.•Public debt is also preferred by those who are fiscally less conservative.•The most preferred financing mode of green investments are wealth taxes.•To boost support for green policies, states can launch apt communication campaigns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113899</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>carbon ; climate ; climate change ; Conjoint experiment ; credit ; debt ; energy policy ; Green investments ; Italy ; markets ; Netherlands ; politics ; Public debt ; Public support ; surveys</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2024-01, Vol.184, p.113899, Article 113899</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b880db52cce2332e8b5241bbde46e790a40ec0bb42c10fa392165536b91862393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b880db52cce2332e8b5241bbde46e790a40ec0bb42c10fa392165536b91862393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8289-847X ; 0000-0003-2147-2368 ; 0000-0003-0823-0436 ; 0000-0002-1186-5427</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collewet, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiGiuseppe, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrijburg, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><title>How to finance green investments? The role of public debt</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Economic costs are a central political obstacle to investing in climate change mitigation and adaptation measures. Several studies now demonstrate that as costs increase, voters are less likely to support green initiatives. In this paper we argue that opposition to government green investments is conditional on the method of financing. Notably, because public debt shifts the burden of investments into the future, it may face less public opposition than broad based taxes that require an immediate sacrifice. To test this proposition, we fielded a preregistered conjoint survey experiment on nationally representative samples in one highly indebted (Italy) and one fiscally sound country (The Netherlands). We find debt financing increases voter support for green financing by up to 10 percentage points relative to broad-based taxes. However, we find carbon taxes and wealth taxes are most preferred. These findings demonstrate that credit market tools, like green bonds and debt for climate swaps, are likely politically efficient and not just economically efficient. Where investments are already financed with debt, the findings suggest that political communication can limit a political backlash to green investments. Most importantly, the findings show that the political opposition to paying for green investments can be circumvented. •Public debt is a preferred financing tool for green investments.•Public debt is particularly preferred by those who care about future generations.•Public debt is also preferred by those who are fiscally less conservative.•The most preferred financing mode of green investments are wealth taxes.•To boost support for green policies, states can launch apt communication campaigns.</description><subject>carbon</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Conjoint experiment</subject><subject>credit</subject><subject>debt</subject><subject>energy policy</subject><subject>Green investments</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>markets</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>politics</subject><subject>Public debt</subject><subject>Public support</subject><subject>surveys</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhj2ARCn8AhaPLAnnj5h4QAhVQJEqsZTZip0LuErjYCdF_HtSwsx0N7zPq7uHkCsGOQOmbnY5dn1ocw5c5IyJUusTsgABLJOcFWfkPKUdAMhSywXR6_BFh0Ab31WdQ_oeETvquwOmYY_dkO7p9gNpDC3S0NB-tK13tEY7XJDTpmoTXv7NJXl7etyu1tnm9fll9bDJnAQ1ZLYsobYFdw65EBzLaZfM2hqlwlsNlQR0YK3kjkFTCc2ZKgqhrGal4kKLJbmee_sYPsfpLLP3yWHbVh2GMRkBEqTgSsEUFXPUxZBSxMb00e-r-G0YmKMcszO_csxRjpnlTNTdTOH0xcFjNMl5nGTUPqIbTB38v_wP2E5uxA</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw</creator><creator>Collewet, Marion</creator><creator>DiGiuseppe, Matthew</creator><creator>Vrijburg, Hendrik</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-847X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-2368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-0436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1186-5427</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>How to finance green investments? The role of public debt</title><author>Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw ; Collewet, Marion ; DiGiuseppe, Matthew ; Vrijburg, Hendrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b880db52cce2332e8b5241bbde46e790a40ec0bb42c10fa392165536b91862393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>carbon</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Conjoint experiment</topic><topic>credit</topic><topic>debt</topic><topic>energy policy</topic><topic>Green investments</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>markets</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>politics</topic><topic>Public debt</topic><topic>Public support</topic><topic>surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collewet, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiGiuseppe, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrijburg, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw</au><au>Collewet, Marion</au><au>DiGiuseppe, Matthew</au><au>Vrijburg, Hendrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to finance green investments? The role of public debt</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>184</volume><spage>113899</spage><pages>113899-</pages><artnum>113899</artnum><issn>0301-4215</issn><abstract>Economic costs are a central political obstacle to investing in climate change mitigation and adaptation measures. Several studies now demonstrate that as costs increase, voters are less likely to support green initiatives. In this paper we argue that opposition to government green investments is conditional on the method of financing. Notably, because public debt shifts the burden of investments into the future, it may face less public opposition than broad based taxes that require an immediate sacrifice. To test this proposition, we fielded a preregistered conjoint survey experiment on nationally representative samples in one highly indebted (Italy) and one fiscally sound country (The Netherlands). We find debt financing increases voter support for green financing by up to 10 percentage points relative to broad-based taxes. However, we find carbon taxes and wealth taxes are most preferred. These findings demonstrate that credit market tools, like green bonds and debt for climate swaps, are likely politically efficient and not just economically efficient. Where investments are already financed with debt, the findings suggest that political communication can limit a political backlash to green investments. Most importantly, the findings show that the political opposition to paying for green investments can be circumvented. •Public debt is a preferred financing tool for green investments.•Public debt is particularly preferred by those who care about future generations.•Public debt is also preferred by those who are fiscally less conservative.•The most preferred financing mode of green investments are wealth taxes.•To boost support for green policies, states can launch apt communication campaigns.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113899</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-847X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-2368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-0436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1186-5427</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2024-01, Vol.184, p.113899, Article 113899
issn 0301-4215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040432660
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects carbon
climate
climate change
Conjoint experiment
credit
debt
energy policy
Green investments
Italy
markets
Netherlands
politics
Public debt
Public support
surveys
title How to finance green investments? The role of public debt
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A23%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20finance%20green%20investments?%20The%20role%20of%20public%20debt&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Kantorowicz,%20Jaroslaw&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=184&rft.spage=113899&rft.pages=113899-&rft.artnum=113899&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113899&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3040432660%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b880db52cce2332e8b5241bbde46e790a40ec0bb42c10fa392165536b91862393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3040432660&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true