Loading…

Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction Accuracy Between 2 Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry Devices

To compare intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction accuracy of the Eyestar 900 (EyeS900) and the IOLMaster 700 (IOLM700) based on estimated and measured posterior corneal power. Retrospective, interinstrument reliability study. Setting: Institutional. Participants: Two hundred twenty-five eyes of 22...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of ophthalmology 2024-09, Vol.265, p.156-164
Main Authors: SORKIN, NIR, ZADOK, ROTEM, SAVINI, GIACOMO, KAN-TOR, YOAV, BENJAMINI, YUVAL, LEVINGER, ELIYA, BARDUGO, JUDITH, ABULAFIA, ADI
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-fe3c5b41d19e21fc04d9c0c8b6d90075bef862b6dad08ce8cd868ad9e0c106733
container_end_page 164
container_issue
container_start_page 156
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 265
creator SORKIN, NIR
ZADOK, ROTEM
SAVINI, GIACOMO
KAN-TOR, YOAV
BENJAMINI, YUVAL
LEVINGER, ELIYA
BARDUGO, JUDITH
ABULAFIA, ADI
description To compare intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction accuracy of the Eyestar 900 (EyeS900) and the IOLMaster 700 (IOLM700) based on estimated and measured posterior corneal power. Retrospective, interinstrument reliability study. Setting: Institutional. Participants: Two hundred twenty-five eyes of 225 cataract surgery patients. Measurements: Patients underwent measurements by both devices preoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: Spherical Equivalent Prediction Error (SEQ-PE), spread of the SEQ-PE (precision) and the absolute SEQ-PE (accuracy) of each device using Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula with either estimated posterior keratometry (E-PK) or measured posterior keratometry (M-PK). Trimmed mean SEQ-PEs of EyeS900 E-PK, EyeS900 M-PK, IOLM700 E-PK, and IOLM700 M-PK were 0.03, 0.08, 0.02, and 0.09 D, respectively with no significant differences between EyeS900 E-PK and IOLM700 E-PK (P = 0.31) as well as between EyeS900 M-PK and IOLM700 M-PK (P = 0.31). Statistically significant SEQ-PE differences were found when E-PK and M-PK were compared, regardless of the device used, showing hyperopic SEQ-PE in M-PK calculations. Excellent correlation and agreement in SEQ-PE were found between the devices for both E-PK (P < 0.001, r = 0.848, mean bias: +0.01 D, 95% LOA of −0.32 to +0.34 D) and M-PK (P < 0.001, r = 0.776, mean bias: −0.01 D, 95% LOA of −0.42 to +0.39 D). No significant differences were found comparing absolute SEQ-PE and precision of the devices. The Eyestar 900 and the IOLMaster 700 show comparable IOL power prediction accuracy by the BUII formula using either estimated or measured posterior keratometry. An adjusted lens factor may be required for BUII when utilizing measured posterior keratometry in both devices.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3043779358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002939424001600</els_id><sourcerecordid>3043779358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-fe3c5b41d19e21fc04d9c0c8b6d90075bef862b6dad08ce8cd868ad9e0c106733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaTZpf0AvRcdevJEsry2RU7JtPmAhgaRnoR2NGy225Uhylj3kv0fLJjkWBoYZnnlhHkJ-cDbnjNenm7nZ-HnJymrOcnHxicy4bFTBpeKfyYwxVhZKqOqIHMe4yWPdVM1XciRkXQmpyhl5Wfp-NMFFP1Df0pshBeNh6kygKxwivfNbDPQuoHWQXIbOAaZgYEcvMG0RB1rS-y2Oqbj3UwCkt2NyYDq69I8YcMibB9_7f8GMj_nG-R5T2NHf-OwA4zfypTVdxO9v_YT8vfzzsLwuVrdXN8vzVQGlWKSiRQGLdcUtV1jyFlhlFTCQ69oqxprFGltZl3kylklACVbW0liFDHh-WYgT8uuQOwb_NGFMuncRsOvMgH6KWrBKNI0SC5lRfkAh-BgDtnoMrjdhpznTe-t6o7N1vbeuWS6-j__5Fj-te7QfF--aM3B2ADA_-eww6AhuL8e6gJC09e4_8a-lu5S0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3043779358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction Accuracy Between 2 Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry Devices</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>SORKIN, NIR ; ZADOK, ROTEM ; SAVINI, GIACOMO ; KAN-TOR, YOAV ; BENJAMINI, YUVAL ; LEVINGER, ELIYA ; BARDUGO, JUDITH ; ABULAFIA, ADI</creator><creatorcontrib>SORKIN, NIR ; ZADOK, ROTEM ; SAVINI, GIACOMO ; KAN-TOR, YOAV ; BENJAMINI, YUVAL ; LEVINGER, ELIYA ; BARDUGO, JUDITH ; ABULAFIA, ADI</creatorcontrib><description>To compare intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction accuracy of the Eyestar 900 (EyeS900) and the IOLMaster 700 (IOLM700) based on estimated and measured posterior corneal power. Retrospective, interinstrument reliability study. Setting: Institutional. Participants: Two hundred twenty-five eyes of 225 cataract surgery patients. Measurements: Patients underwent measurements by both devices preoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: Spherical Equivalent Prediction Error (SEQ-PE), spread of the SEQ-PE (precision) and the absolute SEQ-PE (accuracy) of each device using Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula with either estimated posterior keratometry (E-PK) or measured posterior keratometry (M-PK). Trimmed mean SEQ-PEs of EyeS900 E-PK, EyeS900 M-PK, IOLM700 E-PK, and IOLM700 M-PK were 0.03, 0.08, 0.02, and 0.09 D, respectively with no significant differences between EyeS900 E-PK and IOLM700 E-PK (P = 0.31) as well as between EyeS900 M-PK and IOLM700 M-PK (P = 0.31). Statistically significant SEQ-PE differences were found when E-PK and M-PK were compared, regardless of the device used, showing hyperopic SEQ-PE in M-PK calculations. Excellent correlation and agreement in SEQ-PE were found between the devices for both E-PK (P &lt; 0.001, r = 0.848, mean bias: +0.01 D, 95% LOA of −0.32 to +0.34 D) and M-PK (P &lt; 0.001, r = 0.776, mean bias: −0.01 D, 95% LOA of −0.42 to +0.39 D). No significant differences were found comparing absolute SEQ-PE and precision of the devices. The Eyestar 900 and the IOLMaster 700 show comparable IOL power prediction accuracy by the BUII formula using either estimated or measured posterior keratometry. An adjusted lens factor may be required for BUII when utilizing measured posterior keratometry in both devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38643892</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2024-09, Vol.265, p.156-164</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-fe3c5b41d19e21fc04d9c0c8b6d90075bef862b6dad08ce8cd868ad9e0c106733</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8756-8309 ; 0000-0003-1292-1475 ; 0000-0003-0721-2834 ; 0000-0002-5008-9432</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38643892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SORKIN, NIR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZADOK, ROTEM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAVINI, GIACOMO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAN-TOR, YOAV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BENJAMINI, YUVAL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEVINGER, ELIYA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARDUGO, JUDITH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ABULAFIA, ADI</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction Accuracy Between 2 Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry Devices</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>To compare intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction accuracy of the Eyestar 900 (EyeS900) and the IOLMaster 700 (IOLM700) based on estimated and measured posterior corneal power. Retrospective, interinstrument reliability study. Setting: Institutional. Participants: Two hundred twenty-five eyes of 225 cataract surgery patients. Measurements: Patients underwent measurements by both devices preoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: Spherical Equivalent Prediction Error (SEQ-PE), spread of the SEQ-PE (precision) and the absolute SEQ-PE (accuracy) of each device using Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula with either estimated posterior keratometry (E-PK) or measured posterior keratometry (M-PK). Trimmed mean SEQ-PEs of EyeS900 E-PK, EyeS900 M-PK, IOLM700 E-PK, and IOLM700 M-PK were 0.03, 0.08, 0.02, and 0.09 D, respectively with no significant differences between EyeS900 E-PK and IOLM700 E-PK (P = 0.31) as well as between EyeS900 M-PK and IOLM700 M-PK (P = 0.31). Statistically significant SEQ-PE differences were found when E-PK and M-PK were compared, regardless of the device used, showing hyperopic SEQ-PE in M-PK calculations. Excellent correlation and agreement in SEQ-PE were found between the devices for both E-PK (P &lt; 0.001, r = 0.848, mean bias: +0.01 D, 95% LOA of −0.32 to +0.34 D) and M-PK (P &lt; 0.001, r = 0.776, mean bias: −0.01 D, 95% LOA of −0.42 to +0.39 D). No significant differences were found comparing absolute SEQ-PE and precision of the devices. The Eyestar 900 and the IOLMaster 700 show comparable IOL power prediction accuracy by the BUII formula using either estimated or measured posterior keratometry. An adjusted lens factor may be required for BUII when utilizing measured posterior keratometry in both devices.</description><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaTZpf0AvRcdevJEsry2RU7JtPmAhgaRnoR2NGy225Uhylj3kv0fLJjkWBoYZnnlhHkJ-cDbnjNenm7nZ-HnJymrOcnHxicy4bFTBpeKfyYwxVhZKqOqIHMe4yWPdVM1XciRkXQmpyhl5Wfp-NMFFP1Df0pshBeNh6kygKxwivfNbDPQuoHWQXIbOAaZgYEcvMG0RB1rS-y2Oqbj3UwCkt2NyYDq69I8YcMibB9_7f8GMj_nG-R5T2NHf-OwA4zfypTVdxO9v_YT8vfzzsLwuVrdXN8vzVQGlWKSiRQGLdcUtV1jyFlhlFTCQ69oqxprFGltZl3kylklACVbW0liFDHh-WYgT8uuQOwb_NGFMuncRsOvMgH6KWrBKNI0SC5lRfkAh-BgDtnoMrjdhpznTe-t6o7N1vbeuWS6-j__5Fj-te7QfF--aM3B2ADA_-eww6AhuL8e6gJC09e4_8a-lu5S0</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>SORKIN, NIR</creator><creator>ZADOK, ROTEM</creator><creator>SAVINI, GIACOMO</creator><creator>KAN-TOR, YOAV</creator><creator>BENJAMINI, YUVAL</creator><creator>LEVINGER, ELIYA</creator><creator>BARDUGO, JUDITH</creator><creator>ABULAFIA, ADI</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8756-8309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-1475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0721-2834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-9432</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction Accuracy Between 2 Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry Devices</title><author>SORKIN, NIR ; ZADOK, ROTEM ; SAVINI, GIACOMO ; KAN-TOR, YOAV ; BENJAMINI, YUVAL ; LEVINGER, ELIYA ; BARDUGO, JUDITH ; ABULAFIA, ADI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-fe3c5b41d19e21fc04d9c0c8b6d90075bef862b6dad08ce8cd868ad9e0c106733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SORKIN, NIR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZADOK, ROTEM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAVINI, GIACOMO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAN-TOR, YOAV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BENJAMINI, YUVAL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEVINGER, ELIYA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARDUGO, JUDITH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ABULAFIA, ADI</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SORKIN, NIR</au><au>ZADOK, ROTEM</au><au>SAVINI, GIACOMO</au><au>KAN-TOR, YOAV</au><au>BENJAMINI, YUVAL</au><au>LEVINGER, ELIYA</au><au>BARDUGO, JUDITH</au><au>ABULAFIA, ADI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction Accuracy Between 2 Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry Devices</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>265</volume><spage>156</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>156-164</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><abstract>To compare intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction accuracy of the Eyestar 900 (EyeS900) and the IOLMaster 700 (IOLM700) based on estimated and measured posterior corneal power. Retrospective, interinstrument reliability study. Setting: Institutional. Participants: Two hundred twenty-five eyes of 225 cataract surgery patients. Measurements: Patients underwent measurements by both devices preoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: Spherical Equivalent Prediction Error (SEQ-PE), spread of the SEQ-PE (precision) and the absolute SEQ-PE (accuracy) of each device using Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula with either estimated posterior keratometry (E-PK) or measured posterior keratometry (M-PK). Trimmed mean SEQ-PEs of EyeS900 E-PK, EyeS900 M-PK, IOLM700 E-PK, and IOLM700 M-PK were 0.03, 0.08, 0.02, and 0.09 D, respectively with no significant differences between EyeS900 E-PK and IOLM700 E-PK (P = 0.31) as well as between EyeS900 M-PK and IOLM700 M-PK (P = 0.31). Statistically significant SEQ-PE differences were found when E-PK and M-PK were compared, regardless of the device used, showing hyperopic SEQ-PE in M-PK calculations. Excellent correlation and agreement in SEQ-PE were found between the devices for both E-PK (P &lt; 0.001, r = 0.848, mean bias: +0.01 D, 95% LOA of −0.32 to +0.34 D) and M-PK (P &lt; 0.001, r = 0.776, mean bias: −0.01 D, 95% LOA of −0.42 to +0.39 D). No significant differences were found comparing absolute SEQ-PE and precision of the devices. The Eyestar 900 and the IOLMaster 700 show comparable IOL power prediction accuracy by the BUII formula using either estimated or measured posterior keratometry. An adjusted lens factor may be required for BUII when utilizing measured posterior keratometry in both devices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38643892</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.013</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8756-8309</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-1475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0721-2834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-9432</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2024-09, Vol.265, p.156-164
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3043779358
source ScienceDirect Journals
title Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction Accuracy Between 2 Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry Devices
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A59%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Intraocular%20Lens%20Power%20Prediction%20Accuracy%20Between%202%20Swept-Source%20Optical%20Coherence%20Tomography%20Biometry%20Devices&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=SORKIN,%20NIR&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=265&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=156-164&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3043779358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-fe3c5b41d19e21fc04d9c0c8b6d90075bef862b6dad08ce8cd868ad9e0c106733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3043779358&rft_id=info:pmid/38643892&rfr_iscdi=true