Loading…

Testing Mechanisms Underlying Children's Reading Development: The Power of Learning Lexical Representations

Prominent theories of reading development have separately emphasized the relevance of children's skill in learning (Share, 2008) and lexical representations (Perfetti & Hart, 2002). Integrating these ideas, we examined whether skill in learning lexical representations is a mechanism that mi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Developmental psychology 2024-07, Vol.60 (7), p.1343-1356
Main Authors: Deacon, S. Hélène, Mimeau, Catherine, Levesque, Kyle, Ricketts, Jessie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1356
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1343
container_title Developmental psychology
container_volume 60
creator Deacon, S. Hélène
Mimeau, Catherine
Levesque, Kyle
Ricketts, Jessie
description Prominent theories of reading development have separately emphasized the relevance of children's skill in learning (Share, 2008) and lexical representations (Perfetti & Hart, 2002). Integrating these ideas, we examined whether skill in learning lexical representations is a mechanism that might explain children's reading development. To do so we conducted a longitudinal study, following 139 children from Grades 3 to 5. In Grade 3, children completed measures of word reading and reading comprehension and again at Grade 5. In Grade 4, children read short stories containing novel words; they were later tested on their memory for the spellings and meanings of these new words, capturing orthographic and semantic learning, respectively. Using multiple-mediation path analysis, we tested whether children's skill in learning orthographic and semantic dimensions of new words was a mediator of individual differences in each of word reading and reading comprehension. In models controlling for nonverbal ability, working memory, vocabulary, and phonological awareness, we found two clear effects: individual differences in orthographic learning at Grade 4 mediated the gains that children made in word reading between Grades 3 and 5 and individual differences in semantic learning at Grade 4 mediated gains in reading comprehension over the same time period. These findings suggest that children's ability to learn lexical representations is a mechanism in reading development, with orthographic effects on word reading and semantic effects on reading comprehension. These findings show the power and the specificity of children's capacity to learn in determining their progress in learning to read. Public Significance StatementReading is one of the most important skills that children can acquire in elementary school, with its successful achievement enabling full societal engagement across the lifespan. This study suggests that children's capacity to learn targeted aspects of words-their spellings and meanings-is a mechanism that drives their reading development. These findings point to the need to incorporate the power of children's learning into theories of and instruction in reading.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/dev0001749
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3045113172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3045113172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a269t-33c97333d5c00b7ab423918335046e8a0b44dc578c2575ce465b84c4533731dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBmALgejScuEBUCQOIERaO2PHNje00BZpK1C1PVuOM8umJE5qJ2337etoC0g9cLI8-vzLo5-QN4weMwrypMZbSimTXD8jC6ZB51Ro_Zws0rDIWcn1AXkV43W6ctDiJTkAVXLJS7Ugv9cYx8b_yi7Qba1vYhezK19jaHfzdLlt2jqgfx-zS7T1PPqKt9j2Q4d-_Jytt5j97O8wZP0mW6ENfiYrvG-cbdOTIWBM0I5N7-MRebGxbcTXj-chuTr9tl6e56sfZ9-XX1a5LUo95gBOSwCohaO0krbiBWimAATlJSpLK85rJ6RyhZDCIS9FpbjjAkACqx0ckg_73CH0N1Paz3RNdNi21mM_RQOUC8aAySLRd0_odT8Fn36XlCpKKbii_1ccCiUkm7M-7pULfYwBN2YITWfDzjBq5qLMv6ISfvsYOVUd1n_pn2YS-LQHdrBmiDtnw9i4FqObQipknMNMSY00DDjAA2-km8I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3043285712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing Mechanisms Underlying Children's Reading Development: The Power of Learning Lexical Representations</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Deacon, S. Hélène ; Mimeau, Catherine ; Levesque, Kyle ; Ricketts, Jessie</creator><contributor>Pérez-Edgar, Koraly</contributor><creatorcontrib>Deacon, S. Hélène ; Mimeau, Catherine ; Levesque, Kyle ; Ricketts, Jessie ; Pérez-Edgar, Koraly</creatorcontrib><description>Prominent theories of reading development have separately emphasized the relevance of children's skill in learning (Share, 2008) and lexical representations (Perfetti &amp; Hart, 2002). Integrating these ideas, we examined whether skill in learning lexical representations is a mechanism that might explain children's reading development. To do so we conducted a longitudinal study, following 139 children from Grades 3 to 5. In Grade 3, children completed measures of word reading and reading comprehension and again at Grade 5. In Grade 4, children read short stories containing novel words; they were later tested on their memory for the spellings and meanings of these new words, capturing orthographic and semantic learning, respectively. Using multiple-mediation path analysis, we tested whether children's skill in learning orthographic and semantic dimensions of new words was a mediator of individual differences in each of word reading and reading comprehension. In models controlling for nonverbal ability, working memory, vocabulary, and phonological awareness, we found two clear effects: individual differences in orthographic learning at Grade 4 mediated the gains that children made in word reading between Grades 3 and 5 and individual differences in semantic learning at Grade 4 mediated gains in reading comprehension over the same time period. These findings suggest that children's ability to learn lexical representations is a mechanism in reading development, with orthographic effects on word reading and semantic effects on reading comprehension. These findings show the power and the specificity of children's capacity to learn in determining their progress in learning to read. Public Significance StatementReading is one of the most important skills that children can acquire in elementary school, with its successful achievement enabling full societal engagement across the lifespan. This study suggests that children's capacity to learn targeted aspects of words-their spellings and meanings-is a mechanism that drives their reading development. These findings point to the need to incorporate the power of children's learning into theories of and instruction in reading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1649</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1939-0599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/dev0001749</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38647468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Child ; Child Development - physiology ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Comprehension - physiology ; Consciousness ; Elementary school students ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Individual differences ; Individuality ; Learning ; Learning - physiology ; Learning Ability ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Mediation ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Nonverbal ability ; Novel words ; Orthography ; Path analysis ; Phonological awareness ; Power ; Reading ; Reading acquisition ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Development ; Semantics ; Short stories ; Short term memory ; Tests ; Vocabulary ; Word Meaning ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Developmental psychology, 2024-07, Vol.60 (7), p.1343-1356</ispartof><rights>2024 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2024, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4792-5137</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31269,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38647468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pérez-Edgar, Koraly</contributor><creatorcontrib>Deacon, S. Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mimeau, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricketts, Jessie</creatorcontrib><title>Testing Mechanisms Underlying Children's Reading Development: The Power of Learning Lexical Representations</title><title>Developmental psychology</title><addtitle>Dev Psychol</addtitle><description>Prominent theories of reading development have separately emphasized the relevance of children's skill in learning (Share, 2008) and lexical representations (Perfetti &amp; Hart, 2002). Integrating these ideas, we examined whether skill in learning lexical representations is a mechanism that might explain children's reading development. To do so we conducted a longitudinal study, following 139 children from Grades 3 to 5. In Grade 3, children completed measures of word reading and reading comprehension and again at Grade 5. In Grade 4, children read short stories containing novel words; they were later tested on their memory for the spellings and meanings of these new words, capturing orthographic and semantic learning, respectively. Using multiple-mediation path analysis, we tested whether children's skill in learning orthographic and semantic dimensions of new words was a mediator of individual differences in each of word reading and reading comprehension. In models controlling for nonverbal ability, working memory, vocabulary, and phonological awareness, we found two clear effects: individual differences in orthographic learning at Grade 4 mediated the gains that children made in word reading between Grades 3 and 5 and individual differences in semantic learning at Grade 4 mediated gains in reading comprehension over the same time period. These findings suggest that children's ability to learn lexical representations is a mechanism in reading development, with orthographic effects on word reading and semantic effects on reading comprehension. These findings show the power and the specificity of children's capacity to learn in determining their progress in learning to read. Public Significance StatementReading is one of the most important skills that children can acquire in elementary school, with its successful achievement enabling full societal engagement across the lifespan. This study suggests that children's capacity to learn targeted aspects of words-their spellings and meanings-is a mechanism that drives their reading development. These findings point to the need to incorporate the power of children's learning into theories of and instruction in reading.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Learning Ability</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Nonverbal ability</subject><subject>Novel words</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Path analysis</subject><subject>Phonological awareness</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading acquisition</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Development</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Short stories</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word Meaning</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>0012-1649</issn><issn>1939-0599</issn><issn>1939-0599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBmALgejScuEBUCQOIERaO2PHNje00BZpK1C1PVuOM8umJE5qJ2337etoC0g9cLI8-vzLo5-QN4weMwrypMZbSimTXD8jC6ZB51Ro_Zws0rDIWcn1AXkV43W6ctDiJTkAVXLJS7Ugv9cYx8b_yi7Qba1vYhezK19jaHfzdLlt2jqgfx-zS7T1PPqKt9j2Q4d-_Jytt5j97O8wZP0mW6ENfiYrvG-cbdOTIWBM0I5N7-MRebGxbcTXj-chuTr9tl6e56sfZ9-XX1a5LUo95gBOSwCohaO0krbiBWimAATlJSpLK85rJ6RyhZDCIS9FpbjjAkACqx0ckg_73CH0N1Paz3RNdNi21mM_RQOUC8aAySLRd0_odT8Fn36XlCpKKbii_1ccCiUkm7M-7pULfYwBN2YITWfDzjBq5qLMv6ISfvsYOVUd1n_pn2YS-LQHdrBmiDtnw9i4FqObQipknMNMSY00DDjAA2-km8I</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Deacon, S. Hélène</creator><creator>Mimeau, Catherine</creator><creator>Levesque, Kyle</creator><creator>Ricketts, Jessie</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4792-5137</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Testing Mechanisms Underlying Children's Reading Development: The Power of Learning Lexical Representations</title><author>Deacon, S. Hélène ; Mimeau, Catherine ; Levesque, Kyle ; Ricketts, Jessie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a269t-33c97333d5c00b7ab423918335046e8a0b44dc578c2575ce465b84c4533731dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Learning Ability</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Nonverbal ability</topic><topic>Novel words</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Path analysis</topic><topic>Phonological awareness</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading acquisition</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Development</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Short stories</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word Meaning</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deacon, S. Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mimeau, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricketts, Jessie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deacon, S. Hélène</au><au>Mimeau, Catherine</au><au>Levesque, Kyle</au><au>Ricketts, Jessie</au><au>Pérez-Edgar, Koraly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing Mechanisms Underlying Children's Reading Development: The Power of Learning Lexical Representations</atitle><jtitle>Developmental psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Psychol</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1343</spage><epage>1356</epage><pages>1343-1356</pages><issn>0012-1649</issn><issn>1939-0599</issn><eissn>1939-0599</eissn><abstract>Prominent theories of reading development have separately emphasized the relevance of children's skill in learning (Share, 2008) and lexical representations (Perfetti &amp; Hart, 2002). Integrating these ideas, we examined whether skill in learning lexical representations is a mechanism that might explain children's reading development. To do so we conducted a longitudinal study, following 139 children from Grades 3 to 5. In Grade 3, children completed measures of word reading and reading comprehension and again at Grade 5. In Grade 4, children read short stories containing novel words; they were later tested on their memory for the spellings and meanings of these new words, capturing orthographic and semantic learning, respectively. Using multiple-mediation path analysis, we tested whether children's skill in learning orthographic and semantic dimensions of new words was a mediator of individual differences in each of word reading and reading comprehension. In models controlling for nonverbal ability, working memory, vocabulary, and phonological awareness, we found two clear effects: individual differences in orthographic learning at Grade 4 mediated the gains that children made in word reading between Grades 3 and 5 and individual differences in semantic learning at Grade 4 mediated gains in reading comprehension over the same time period. These findings suggest that children's ability to learn lexical representations is a mechanism in reading development, with orthographic effects on word reading and semantic effects on reading comprehension. These findings show the power and the specificity of children's capacity to learn in determining their progress in learning to read. Public Significance StatementReading is one of the most important skills that children can acquire in elementary school, with its successful achievement enabling full societal engagement across the lifespan. This study suggests that children's capacity to learn targeted aspects of words-their spellings and meanings-is a mechanism that drives their reading development. These findings point to the need to incorporate the power of children's learning into theories of and instruction in reading.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>38647468</pmid><doi>10.1037/dev0001749</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4792-5137</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1649
ispartof Developmental psychology, 2024-07, Vol.60 (7), p.1343-1356
issn 0012-1649
1939-0599
1939-0599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3045113172
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Child
Child Development - physiology
Children
Children & youth
Comprehension - physiology
Consciousness
Elementary school students
Female
Human
Humans
Individual differences
Individuality
Learning
Learning - physiology
Learning Ability
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Mediation
Memory, Short-Term - physiology
Nonverbal ability
Novel words
Orthography
Path analysis
Phonological awareness
Power
Reading
Reading acquisition
Reading Comprehension
Reading Development
Semantics
Short stories
Short term memory
Tests
Vocabulary
Word Meaning
Words (Phonetic Units)
title Testing Mechanisms Underlying Children's Reading Development: The Power of Learning Lexical Representations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20Mechanisms%20Underlying%20Children's%20Reading%20Development:%20The%20Power%20of%20Learning%20Lexical%20Representations&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20psychology&rft.au=Deacon,%20S.%20H%C3%A9l%C3%A8ne&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1343&rft.epage=1356&rft.pages=1343-1356&rft.issn=0012-1649&rft.eissn=1939-0599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/dev0001749&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3045113172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a269t-33c97333d5c00b7ab423918335046e8a0b44dc578c2575ce465b84c4533731dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3043285712&rft_id=info:pmid/38647468&rfr_iscdi=true