A brief bout of moderate intensity physical activity improves preadolescent children’s behavioral inhibition but does not change their energy intake

• Published in: Journal of behavioral medicine 2024-08, Vol.47 (4), p.692-706
• Main Authors: Kelly, Nichole R., Guidinger, Claire, Swan, Daniel M., Thivel, David, Folger, Austin, Luther, Gabriella M., Hahn, Michael E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Behavior change; Body fat; Change agents; Child; Child Behavior - psychology; Children; Cross-Over Studies; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Eating behavior; Energy; Energy Intake; Executive Function; Exercise; Exercise - psychology; Family Medicine; Feeding Behavior - psychology; Female; Food intake; General Practice; Geography; Health Psychology; Humans; Inhibition; Inhibition, Psychological; Intervention; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mental depression; Older children; Physical activity; Rural communities; Sedentary; Sedentary Behavior; Time use; Walking
• ISSN: 0160-7715; 1573-3521; 1573-3521
• DOI: 10.1007/s10865-024-00495-1

Children in rural communities consume more energy-dense foods relative to their urban peers. Identifying effective interventions for improving energy intake patterns are needed to address these geographic disparities. The primary aim of this study was to harness the benefits of physical activity on children’s executive functioning to see if these improvements lead to acute changes in eating behaviors. In a randomized crossover design, 91 preadolescent (8-10y; M age = 9.48 ± 0.85; 50.5% female; 85.7% White, 9.9% Multiracial, 9.9% Hispanic) children (86% rural) completed a 20-minute physical activity condition (moderate intensity walking) and time-matched sedentary condition (reading and/or coloring) ~ 14 days apart. Immediately following each condition, participants completed a behavioral inhibition task and then eating behaviors (total energy intake, relative energy intake, snack intake) were measured during a multi-array buffet test meal. After adjusting for period and order effects, body fat (measured via DXA), and depressive symptoms, participants experienced significant small improvements in their behavioral inhibition following the physical activity versus sedentary condition ( p  = 0.04, Hedge’s g = 0.198). Eating behaviors did not vary by condition, nor did improvements in behavioral inhibition function as a mediator ( p s > 0.09). Thus, in preadolescent children, small improvements in behavioral inhibition from physical activity do not produce acute improvements in energy intake. Additional research is needed to clarify whether the duration and/or intensity of physical activity sessions would produce different results in this age group, and whether intervention approaches and corresponding mechanisms of change vary by individual factors, like age and degree of food cue responsivity.