Implementing good life with osteoArthritis from Denmark (GLA:D®) in Australian public hospitals. Part 2: Service providers’ perceptions

• Published in: Musculoskeletal science & practice 2024-06, Vol.71, p.102961-102961, Article 102961
• Main Authors: Cottrell, Michelle A., Raymer, Maree E., Maclachlan, Liam R., Vuvan, Viana, Smith, Michelle D., O'Leary, Shaun P., Vicenzino, Bill, Comans, Tracy, Kemp, Joanne L., Barton, Christian J., Collins, Natalie J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Attitude of Health Personnel; Australia; Denmark; Exercise; Female; Focus Groups; Hospitals, Public; Humans; Implementation; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis - therapy; Public health; Qualitative; Qualitative Research; Quality of Life
• ISSN: 2468-7812; 2468-7812
• DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102961

Previous literature has reported the successful implementation of the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®) program into predominantly private practice settings. There may be unique challenges present within the public hospital setting that influence GLA:D® implementation in public health. Explore the attitudes and experiences of service providers directly involved in implementing GLA:D® in Australian public tertiary hospitals. Qualitative descriptive study design. Service providers (n = 14) from three participating hospitals took part in semi-structured focus groups at the completion of the 6-month implementation period. Inductive thematic analysis was employed to identify primary domains across all facilities. Four broad domains were identified. Factors that influenced uptake included GLA:D® being a recognisable, evidence-based product requiring minimal development or adaptation. The fidelity of the GLA:D® Australia program was challenged by referral of patients with multiple/complex medical comorbidities, and patient preference to complete registry data via paper rather than online. Several operational considerations are required when delivering GLA:D® in a public hospital setting, including adequate numbers of GLA:D®-trained staff, additional screening requirements, obtaining appropriate clinical space, and persisting patient barriers to attending the service. GLA:D® provided benefits beyond improvement in pain and function, including social interactivity, high attendance and promotion of long-term self-management, while also maximising service efficiencies. Implementing GLA:D® in Australian public hospitals was supported by service providers. Specific operational and administrative factors, including staff training, patient complexity, and registry requirements should be considered when attempting to embed and sustain GLA:D® in large Australian public tertiary hospitals. •Implementing GLA:D® into Australian public hospitals is achievable.•Evidence-based program requiring minimal adaptation supported uptake by clinicians.•Fidelity of GLA:D® is challenged by complex patient clinical presentations.•Specific operational factors need consideration during implementation stages.•GLA:D® enabled social interactivity, high attendance and self-management promotion.