Loading…

The many faces of stigma after Acquired Brain Injury: a systematic review

Background Stigma after Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) has been described as a significant obstacle for the recovery of survivors. Despite its theoretical and clinical relevance, studies dedicated to stigma after ABI are just starting to emerge. The goal of this systematic review was to integrate the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain impairment 2024-01, Vol.25 (1)
Main Authors: Bracho, María-José, Salas, Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-c80a45a569c64c1676becebb09f83583f5e0d6b7efac809d7479aa47a0dad4433
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Brain impairment
container_volume 25
creator Bracho, María-José
Salas, Christian
description Background Stigma after Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) has been described as a significant obstacle for the recovery of survivors. Despite its theoretical and clinical relevance, studies dedicated to stigma after ABI are just starting to emerge. The goal of this systematic review was to integrate the existing scientific evidence and develop a model of stigma after brain injury that can guide interventions at different levels. Method Three electronic databases were employed. A search strategy was adapted for each database. Articles that explored stigma in adult ABI populations were included. All articles used quantitative, qualitative or mixed method designs and were published in English, Spanish or Portuguese. Results A total of 21 articles were selected. They considered three types of stigma after ABI: (1) self-stigma, (2) stigma-by-association and (3) public stigma. It was also found that information can be processed at implicit and explicit levels across all three forms of stigma. Definitions of each type of stigma used with ABIs are provided as well as related concepts and theoretical frameworks employed. Evidence emerging from different forms of stigma after ABI is summarised. Conclusion Research on stigma after ABI is heterogeneous, and existing studies have explored its impact at individual, family and public levels. A model of stigma after ABI should consider all these levels as well as the interactions that can occur between them. Future studies should explore how to incorporate stigma management as part of neuropsychological rehabilitation programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1071/IB23076
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3049723585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3049723585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-c80a45a569c64c1676becebb09f83583f5e0d6b7efac809d7479aa47a0dad4433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUg_gHyBkvAiR07ZmsrPiJVYilzdHEu4KpJWjsB5d9j1MJ0Nzw93T1CrmN2HzMVP-SLhDMlT8g0zriO0iRNTsMuBI-0FHJCLrzfMMaFFvycTHgmA8bVlOTrT6QNtCOtwaCnXU19bz8aoFD36Ojc7AfrsKILB7alebsZ3PhIgfrR99hAbw11-GXx-5Kc1bD1eHWcM_L-_LRevkart5d8OV9FJhG8j0zGQKSQSm2kMLFUskSDZcl0nfE043WKrJKlwnBPxnSlhNIAQgGroAr_8Bm5O3h3rtsP6Puisd7gdgstdoMvOBNaJUGVBvT2gBrXee-wLnbONuDGImbFb7fi2C2QN0fpUDZY_XN_ofgPQIBm6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049723585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The many faces of stigma after Acquired Brain Injury: a systematic review</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Bracho, María-José ; Salas, Christian</creator><contributor>Simpson, Grahame</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bracho, María-José ; Salas, Christian ; Simpson, Grahame</creatorcontrib><description>Background Stigma after Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) has been described as a significant obstacle for the recovery of survivors. Despite its theoretical and clinical relevance, studies dedicated to stigma after ABI are just starting to emerge. The goal of this systematic review was to integrate the existing scientific evidence and develop a model of stigma after brain injury that can guide interventions at different levels. Method Three electronic databases were employed. A search strategy was adapted for each database. Articles that explored stigma in adult ABI populations were included. All articles used quantitative, qualitative or mixed method designs and were published in English, Spanish or Portuguese. Results A total of 21 articles were selected. They considered three types of stigma after ABI: (1) self-stigma, (2) stigma-by-association and (3) public stigma. It was also found that information can be processed at implicit and explicit levels across all three forms of stigma. Definitions of each type of stigma used with ABIs are provided as well as related concepts and theoretical frameworks employed. Evidence emerging from different forms of stigma after ABI is summarised. Conclusion Research on stigma after ABI is heterogeneous, and existing studies have explored its impact at individual, family and public levels. A model of stigma after ABI should consider all these levels as well as the interactions that can occur between them. Future studies should explore how to incorporate stigma management as part of neuropsychological rehabilitation programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1443-9646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-5252</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/IB23076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38683937</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Brain Injuries - psychology ; Brain Injuries - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Social Stigma</subject><ispartof>Brain impairment, 2024-01, Vol.25 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-c80a45a569c64c1676becebb09f83583f5e0d6b7efac809d7479aa47a0dad4433</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0521-9055 ; 0000-0001-7700-1341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38683937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Simpson, Grahame</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bracho, María-José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>The many faces of stigma after Acquired Brain Injury: a systematic review</title><title>Brain impairment</title><addtitle>Brain Impair</addtitle><description>Background Stigma after Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) has been described as a significant obstacle for the recovery of survivors. Despite its theoretical and clinical relevance, studies dedicated to stigma after ABI are just starting to emerge. The goal of this systematic review was to integrate the existing scientific evidence and develop a model of stigma after brain injury that can guide interventions at different levels. Method Three electronic databases were employed. A search strategy was adapted for each database. Articles that explored stigma in adult ABI populations were included. All articles used quantitative, qualitative or mixed method designs and were published in English, Spanish or Portuguese. Results A total of 21 articles were selected. They considered three types of stigma after ABI: (1) self-stigma, (2) stigma-by-association and (3) public stigma. It was also found that information can be processed at implicit and explicit levels across all three forms of stigma. Definitions of each type of stigma used with ABIs are provided as well as related concepts and theoretical frameworks employed. Evidence emerging from different forms of stigma after ABI is summarised. Conclusion Research on stigma after ABI is heterogeneous, and existing studies have explored its impact at individual, family and public levels. A model of stigma after ABI should consider all these levels as well as the interactions that can occur between them. Future studies should explore how to incorporate stigma management as part of neuropsychological rehabilitation programs.</description><subject>Brain Injuries - psychology</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><issn>1443-9646</issn><issn>1839-5252</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUg_gHyBkvAiR07ZmsrPiJVYilzdHEu4KpJWjsB5d9j1MJ0Nzw93T1CrmN2HzMVP-SLhDMlT8g0zriO0iRNTsMuBI-0FHJCLrzfMMaFFvycTHgmA8bVlOTrT6QNtCOtwaCnXU19bz8aoFD36Ojc7AfrsKILB7alebsZ3PhIgfrR99hAbw11-GXx-5Kc1bD1eHWcM_L-_LRevkart5d8OV9FJhG8j0zGQKSQSm2kMLFUskSDZcl0nfE043WKrJKlwnBPxnSlhNIAQgGroAr_8Bm5O3h3rtsP6Puisd7gdgstdoMvOBNaJUGVBvT2gBrXee-wLnbONuDGImbFb7fi2C2QN0fpUDZY_XN_ofgPQIBm6w</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Bracho, María-José</creator><creator>Salas, Christian</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-9055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-1341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>The many faces of stigma after Acquired Brain Injury: a systematic review</title><author>Bracho, María-José ; Salas, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-c80a45a569c64c1676becebb09f83583f5e0d6b7efac809d7479aa47a0dad4433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain Injuries - psychology</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bracho, María-José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain impairment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bracho, María-José</au><au>Salas, Christian</au><au>Simpson, Grahame</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The many faces of stigma after Acquired Brain Injury: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Brain impairment</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Impair</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1443-9646</issn><eissn>1839-5252</eissn><abstract>Background Stigma after Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) has been described as a significant obstacle for the recovery of survivors. Despite its theoretical and clinical relevance, studies dedicated to stigma after ABI are just starting to emerge. The goal of this systematic review was to integrate the existing scientific evidence and develop a model of stigma after brain injury that can guide interventions at different levels. Method Three electronic databases were employed. A search strategy was adapted for each database. Articles that explored stigma in adult ABI populations were included. All articles used quantitative, qualitative or mixed method designs and were published in English, Spanish or Portuguese. Results A total of 21 articles were selected. They considered three types of stigma after ABI: (1) self-stigma, (2) stigma-by-association and (3) public stigma. It was also found that information can be processed at implicit and explicit levels across all three forms of stigma. Definitions of each type of stigma used with ABIs are provided as well as related concepts and theoretical frameworks employed. Evidence emerging from different forms of stigma after ABI is summarised. Conclusion Research on stigma after ABI is heterogeneous, and existing studies have explored its impact at individual, family and public levels. A model of stigma after ABI should consider all these levels as well as the interactions that can occur between them. Future studies should explore how to incorporate stigma management as part of neuropsychological rehabilitation programs.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>38683937</pmid><doi>10.1071/IB23076</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-9055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-1341</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1443-9646
ispartof Brain impairment, 2024-01, Vol.25 (1)
issn 1443-9646
1839-5252
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3049723585
source Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Brain Injuries - psychology
Brain Injuries - rehabilitation
Humans
Social Stigma
title The many faces of stigma after Acquired Brain Injury: a systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A50%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20many%20faces%20of%20stigma%20after%20Acquired%20Brain%20Injury:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Brain%20impairment&rft.au=Bracho,%20Mar%C3%ADa-Jos%C3%A9&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1443-9646&rft.eissn=1839-5252&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/IB23076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3049723585%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-c80a45a569c64c1676becebb09f83583f5e0d6b7efac809d7479aa47a0dad4433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049723585&rft_id=info:pmid/38683937&rfr_iscdi=true