Commissioning and co‐production in health and care services in the United Kingdom and Ireland: An exploratory literature review

• Published in: Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 2024-06, Vol.27 (3), p.e14053-n/a
• Main Authors: Scott, Rebecca J., Mathie, Elspeth, Newman, Hannah J. H., Almack, Kathryn, Brady, Louca‐Mai
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Capacity building approach; Citizen participation; Co-design; Collaboration; Commissioners; Commissioning; co‐production; Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration; Funding; health; Health care; Health Policy; Health services; Humans; Integrated delivery systems; Ireland; Landscape; Leadership; literature review; Literature reviews; Patients; Pilot projects; Politics; Primary care; Production; Public buildings; Public health; Public involvement; Questions; Service design; social care; Social policy; State Medicine - organization & administration; United Kingdom; Values
• ISSN: 1369-6513; 1369-7625; 1369-7625
• DOI: 10.1111/hex.14053

Introduction This exploratory literature review seeks to examine the literature around commissioning processes in the co‐production of health and care services, focusing on two questions: How do health and care commissioning processes facilitate and/or pose barriers to co‐production in service design and delivery? What are the contextual factors that influence these processes? Method A systematic search of three databases (Medline, Public Health and Social Policy and Practice) and a search platform (Web of Science) was conducted for the period 2008–2023. A total of 2675 records were retrieved. After deduplication, 1925 were screened at title and level. Forty‐seven reports from 42 United Kingdom and Ireland studies were included in the review. A thematic synthesis of included studies was conducted in relation to the research questions. Results The review identified one overarching theme across the synthesised literature: the complexity of the commissioning landscape. Three interconnected subthemes illuminate the contextual factors that influence this landscape: commissioners as leaders of co‐production; navigating relationships and the collective voice. Conclusion Commissioning processes were commonly a barrier to the co‐production of health and care services. Though co‐production was an aspiration for many commissioners, the political and economic environment and service pressures meant that it was often not fully realised. More flexible funding models, longer‐term pilot projects, an increased emphasis in social value across the health and care system and building capacity for strong leadership in commissioning is needed. Patient and Public Contribution Patients and the public did not contribute to this review as it was a small piece of work following on from a completed project, with no budget for public involvement.