Loading…

Effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg on physical functioning and weight‐ and health‐related quality of life in adults with overweight or obesity: Patient‐reported outcomes from the STEP 1–4 trials

Aims To summarize the effects of semaglutide 2.4 mg on weight‐related quality of life (WRQOL) and health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), focusing on the confirmatory secondary endpoint of physical functioning. Materials and Methods The STEP 1–4 Phase 3a, 68‐week, double‐blind, randomized controlled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2024-07, Vol.26 (7), p.2945-2955
Main Authors: Rubino, Domenica, Bjorner, Jakob B., Rathor, Naveen, Sharma, Arya M., Huth Smith, Lisa, Wharton, Sean, Wadden, Thomas, Zeuthen, Niels, Kolotkin, Ronette L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims To summarize the effects of semaglutide 2.4 mg on weight‐related quality of life (WRQOL) and health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), focusing on the confirmatory secondary endpoint of physical functioning. Materials and Methods The STEP 1–4 Phase 3a, 68‐week, double‐blind, randomized controlled trials assessed the efficacy and safety of semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo in individuals with overweight/obesity. WRQOL and HRQOL were assessed by change from baseline to Week 68 in two different but complementary measures, the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life‐Lite Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL‐Lite‐CT; STEP 1 and 2) and the SF‐36v2 Health Survey Acute (SF‐36v2; STEP 1–4). Results Superiority for semaglutide 2.4 mg over placebo based on IWQOL‐Lite‐CT and SF‐36v2 physical functioning scores was confirmed in STEP 1 and 2 and in STEP 1, 2 and 4, respectively. At Week 68, a greater proportion of participants treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg than with placebo reached meaningful within‐person change (MWPC) thresholds for IWQOL‐Lite‐CT Physical Function scores in STEP 1 (51.8% vs. 28.3%; p 
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.15620