Loading…

Impact of anemia on outcomes and resource utilization in patients with myocardial infarction: A national database analysis

Although anemia is common in patients with myocardial infarction (MI), management remains controversial. We quantified the association of anemia with in-hospital outcomes and resource utilization in patients admitted with MI using a large national database. All hospitalizations with a primary diagno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of cardiology 2024-08, Vol.408, p.132111-132111, Article 132111
Main Authors: Jhand, Aravdeep S., Abusnina, Waiel, Tak, Hyo Jung, Ahmed, Arslan, Ismayl, Mahmoud, Altin, S. Elissa, Sherwood, Matthew W., Alexander, John H., Rao, Sunil V., Abbott, J. Dawn, Carson, Jeffrey L., Goldsweig, Andrew M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although anemia is common in patients with myocardial infarction (MI), management remains controversial. We quantified the association of anemia with in-hospital outcomes and resource utilization in patients admitted with MI using a large national database. All hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis code for acute MI in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Among these hospitalizations, patients with anemia were identified using a secondary diagnosis code. Data on demographic and clinical variables were collected. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital adverse events, length of stay (LOS), and total cost. Multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models were used to evaluate the relationship between anemia and outcomes. Among 1,113,181 MI hospitalizations, 254,816 (22.8%) included concomitant anemia. Anemic patients were older and more likely to be women. After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, anemia was associated with higher mortality (7.1 vs. 4.3%; odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–1.12, p 
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132111