Unexpected positive cultures in revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

• Published in: International orthopaedics 2024-08, Vol.48 (8), p.2041-2046
• Main Authors: Lara-Taranchenko, Yuri, Moreira, Tiago, Alfaraj, Abdullah A., Sandiford, N. Amir, Guerra-Farfán, Ernesto, Gehrke, Thorsten, Citak, Mustafa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods; Female; Humans; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects; Knee Prosthesis - microbiology; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Original Paper; Orthopedics; Prevalence; Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis; Prosthesis-Related Infections - epidemiology; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology; Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology; Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 0341-2695; 1432-5195; 1432-5195
• DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06203-7

Purpose Unexpected positive cultures are defined as a single positive culture in intraoperative samples taken during revision surgery after prosthetic joint infection was preoperatively ruled out. This study aims to determine the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). As a secondary objective, this study aims to compare the re-intervention rate in this specific group, between UPC and non-UPC patients. The hypothesis is that the UPC prevalence in patients who undergo a revision TKA after UKA is not higher than in other TKA revision cases and this does not increase the risk of re-intervention. Methods This is a retrospective study where all patients who underwent a UKA revision from January 2016 to February 2023 in a high-volume arthroplasty centre, were analyzed. Unexpected positive culture prevalence in this group of patients was obtained. Results During the included period, 270 UKA revision surgeries were performed. Eight cases had at least two positive cultures and were therefore excluded. The final analysis included 262 patients. Of these, 8 (3.05%) patients presented UPCs and the isolated microorganisms were low-virulence organisms. None of the UPC patients received any treatment. No statistical differences were found between UPC and non-UPC groups in the analyzed variables. Conclusion The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures in patients following revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is lower than in patients who undergo a revision of total knee arthroplasty. In UKA patients a UPC does not seem to increase the risk of a re-intervention, so it can be safely ignored if ICM criteria are not met.