Loading…

Balance measures of mini and brief balance evaluation system tests for Iranian population

Falling is a serious problem for all ages. There are several tests to assess balance. Mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest are balance tests for which there are no normative values for Iranian people. We aimed to provide the normative values of mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest among healthy Iranian adults....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene 2024-03, Vol.65 (1), p.E83-E92
Main Authors: Nakhostin-Ansari, Amin, Naghshtabrizi, Nima, Mohammadzadeh, Maryam, Naghdi, Soofia, Delavari, Farnaz, Khalifeloo, Maedeh, Vezvaei, Payam, Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Falling is a serious problem for all ages. There are several tests to assess balance. Mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest are balance tests for which there are no normative values for Iranian people. We aimed to provide the normative values of mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest among healthy Iranian adults. A cross-sectional study was designed. Three hundred healthy adults (150 males and 150 females) in six age groups (18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, +70 years) completed the tests using Persian mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest. Normative values were calculated for age groups. Normative values of mini-BESTest and brief- BESTest decreased significantly with age (from 27 to 21.9 for mini-BESTest and from 22.9 to 15.4 for brief BESTest). There were no significant differences between genders except for females in 30-39 and 40-49 years age groups which scored better on brief-BESTest and mini-BESTest, respectively. Males had significantly scored better in brief- BESTest in 60-69 and ≥ 70 age groups. The normative values of the mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest provided for healthy Iranian adults can help clinicians when assessing subjects with balance dysfunction.
ISSN:2421-4248
DOI:10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.1.3051