Loading…

Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study

It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience. Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery 2024-11, Vol.237, p.115755, Article 115755
Main Authors: Winer, Leah K., Panzica, Nicole, Lynch, Kenneth, Parker, Catherine, Lancaster, Rachael, Gillis, Andrea, Lindeman, Brenessa, Chen, Herbert, Fazendin, Jessica, Cortez, Alexander R., Zmijewski, Polina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 115755
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 237
creator Winer, Leah K.
Panzica, Nicole
Lynch, Kenneth
Parker, Catherine
Lancaster, Rachael
Gillis, Andrea
Lindeman, Brenessa
Chen, Herbert
Fazendin, Jessica
Cortez, Alexander R.
Zmijewski, Polina
description It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience. Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs. There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p ​= ​0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p ​= ​0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of “misidentification,” “feeling unwelcome,” and “poor trust/autonomy.” To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments. Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience. [Display omitted] •Prior studies reveal gender and sex-based differences in general surgery case logs and operative experience.•In this multicenter study, 53% of female general surgery residents felt that gender influences training quality.•Sexism and gender bias were the predominant perceived barriers to operating room participation for female residents.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.026
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3053136883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961024002630</els_id><sourcerecordid>3109787607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5SAl730mEq68-FFlsUvWBBEzyHdqZ5NM90Zk-5l5-4PN-2MHrwIBUnIU28V70vIS2BbYCDfDFs3DnlJuy1nvN6yUlw-IhvQylSgtXhMNowxXhkJ7II8y3koT4BaPCUXQiswUsOG_PyKOXicZnrAlA_YzeEeM40Tne-QprhHGnu6w8ljomGisWBuZSg-lGvAqUPqlxSm3UqVzz1dt8J0pOkk3R3pnFyYCvKWXtMxPKCvRpzvos80z4s_PidPerfP-OJ8XpLvH95_u_lU3X75-Pnm-rbqRA1zxRXXRivnGsYN1J6B422nuZJKN9KrpnY9Nw3re4BeNK0RAIqBcsa3Rra1uCRXJ91Dij8WzLMdQ-5wv3cTxiVbwRoBQhbzCvr6H3SIS5rKdlYAM0oryVShmhPVpZhzwt4eUhhdOlpgdo3JDvYck11jsqwUl6Xv1Vl9aUf0f7v-5FKAdycAix33AZPN3W-vfUglI-tj-M-IXx77pzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109787607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Winer, Leah K. ; Panzica, Nicole ; Lynch, Kenneth ; Parker, Catherine ; Lancaster, Rachael ; Gillis, Andrea ; Lindeman, Brenessa ; Chen, Herbert ; Fazendin, Jessica ; Cortez, Alexander R. ; Zmijewski, Polina</creator><creatorcontrib>Winer, Leah K. ; Panzica, Nicole ; Lynch, Kenneth ; Parker, Catherine ; Lancaster, Rachael ; Gillis, Andrea ; Lindeman, Brenessa ; Chen, Herbert ; Fazendin, Jessica ; Cortez, Alexander R. ; Zmijewski, Polina</creatorcontrib><description>It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience. Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs. There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p ​= ​0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p ​= ​0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of “misidentification,” “feeling unwelcome,” and “poor trust/autonomy.” To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments. Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience. [Display omitted] •Prior studies reveal gender and sex-based differences in general surgery case logs and operative experience.•In this multicenter study, 53% of female general surgery residents felt that gender influences training quality.•Sexism and gender bias were the predominant perceived barriers to operating room participation for female residents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38719681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Consortia ; Demographics ; Discrimination ; Ethnicity ; Females ; Gender ; Gender disparities ; General surgery residency ; Human bias ; Nurses ; Operative experience ; Perceptions ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Qualitative research ; Surgery ; Training</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2024-11, Vol.237, p.115755, Article 115755</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2024. Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0818-6439 ; 0000-0002-4481-5549 ; 0000-0003-1334-7567</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38719681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winer, Leah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lancaster, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillis, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeman, Brenessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazendin, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortez, Alexander R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zmijewski, Polina</creatorcontrib><title>Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience. Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs. There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p ​= ​0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p ​= ​0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of “misidentification,” “feeling unwelcome,” and “poor trust/autonomy.” To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments. Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience. [Display omitted] •Prior studies reveal gender and sex-based differences in general surgery case logs and operative experience.•In this multicenter study, 53% of female general surgery residents felt that gender influences training quality.•Sexism and gender bias were the predominant perceived barriers to operating room participation for female residents.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender disparities</subject><subject>General surgery residency</subject><subject>Human bias</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Operative experience</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5SAl730mEq68-FFlsUvWBBEzyHdqZ5NM90Zk-5l5-4PN-2MHrwIBUnIU28V70vIS2BbYCDfDFs3DnlJuy1nvN6yUlw-IhvQylSgtXhMNowxXhkJ7II8y3koT4BaPCUXQiswUsOG_PyKOXicZnrAlA_YzeEeM40Tne-QprhHGnu6w8ljomGisWBuZSg-lGvAqUPqlxSm3UqVzz1dt8J0pOkk3R3pnFyYCvKWXtMxPKCvRpzvos80z4s_PidPerfP-OJ8XpLvH95_u_lU3X75-Pnm-rbqRA1zxRXXRivnGsYN1J6B422nuZJKN9KrpnY9Nw3re4BeNK0RAIqBcsa3Rra1uCRXJ91Dij8WzLMdQ-5wv3cTxiVbwRoBQhbzCvr6H3SIS5rKdlYAM0oryVShmhPVpZhzwt4eUhhdOlpgdo3JDvYck11jsqwUl6Xv1Vl9aUf0f7v-5FKAdycAix33AZPN3W-vfUglI-tj-M-IXx77pzc</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Winer, Leah K.</creator><creator>Panzica, Nicole</creator><creator>Lynch, Kenneth</creator><creator>Parker, Catherine</creator><creator>Lancaster, Rachael</creator><creator>Gillis, Andrea</creator><creator>Lindeman, Brenessa</creator><creator>Chen, Herbert</creator><creator>Fazendin, Jessica</creator><creator>Cortez, Alexander R.</creator><creator>Zmijewski, Polina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-6439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-5549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-7567</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study</title><author>Winer, Leah K. ; Panzica, Nicole ; Lynch, Kenneth ; Parker, Catherine ; Lancaster, Rachael ; Gillis, Andrea ; Lindeman, Brenessa ; Chen, Herbert ; Fazendin, Jessica ; Cortez, Alexander R. ; Zmijewski, Polina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender disparities</topic><topic>General surgery residency</topic><topic>Human bias</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Operative experience</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winer, Leah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lancaster, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillis, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeman, Brenessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazendin, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortez, Alexander R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zmijewski, Polina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winer, Leah K.</au><au>Panzica, Nicole</au><au>Lynch, Kenneth</au><au>Parker, Catherine</au><au>Lancaster, Rachael</au><au>Gillis, Andrea</au><au>Lindeman, Brenessa</au><au>Chen, Herbert</au><au>Fazendin, Jessica</au><au>Cortez, Alexander R.</au><au>Zmijewski, Polina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>237</volume><spage>115755</spage><pages>115755-</pages><artnum>115755</artnum><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience. Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs. There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p ​= ​0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p ​= ​0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of “misidentification,” “feeling unwelcome,” and “poor trust/autonomy.” To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments. Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience. [Display omitted] •Prior studies reveal gender and sex-based differences in general surgery case logs and operative experience.•In this multicenter study, 53% of female general surgery residents felt that gender influences training quality.•Sexism and gender bias were the predominant perceived barriers to operating room participation for female residents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38719681</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.026</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-6439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-5549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-7567</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2024-11, Vol.237, p.115755, Article 115755
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3053136883
source Elsevier
subjects Bias
Consortia
Demographics
Discrimination
Ethnicity
Females
Gender
Gender disparities
General surgery residency
Human bias
Nurses
Operative experience
Perceptions
Polls & surveys
Qualitative research
Surgery
Training
title Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A42%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resident%20perspectives%20on%20the%20role%20of%20gender%20in%20operative%20experience%20during%20general%20surgery%20residency%20training:%20A%20mixed-methods%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Winer,%20Leah%20K.&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=237&rft.spage=115755&rft.pages=115755-&rft.artnum=115755&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3109787607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109787607&rft_id=info:pmid/38719681&rfr_iscdi=true