Loading…
Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study
It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience. Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2024-11, Vol.237, p.115755, Article 115755 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 115755 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 237 |
creator | Winer, Leah K. Panzica, Nicole Lynch, Kenneth Parker, Catherine Lancaster, Rachael Gillis, Andrea Lindeman, Brenessa Chen, Herbert Fazendin, Jessica Cortez, Alexander R. Zmijewski, Polina |
description | It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience.
Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs.
There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p = 0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p = 0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of “misidentification,” “feeling unwelcome,” and “poor trust/autonomy.” To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments.
Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience.
[Display omitted]
•Prior studies reveal gender and sex-based differences in general surgery case logs and operative experience.•In this multicenter study, 53% of female general surgery residents felt that gender influences training quality.•Sexism and gender bias were the predominant perceived barriers to operating room participation for female residents. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.026 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3053136883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961024002630</els_id><sourcerecordid>3109787607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5SAl730mEq68-FFlsUvWBBEzyHdqZ5NM90Zk-5l5-4PN-2MHrwIBUnIU28V70vIS2BbYCDfDFs3DnlJuy1nvN6yUlw-IhvQylSgtXhMNowxXhkJ7II8y3koT4BaPCUXQiswUsOG_PyKOXicZnrAlA_YzeEeM40Tne-QprhHGnu6w8ljomGisWBuZSg-lGvAqUPqlxSm3UqVzz1dt8J0pOkk3R3pnFyYCvKWXtMxPKCvRpzvos80z4s_PidPerfP-OJ8XpLvH95_u_lU3X75-Pnm-rbqRA1zxRXXRivnGsYN1J6B422nuZJKN9KrpnY9Nw3re4BeNK0RAIqBcsa3Rra1uCRXJ91Dij8WzLMdQ-5wv3cTxiVbwRoBQhbzCvr6H3SIS5rKdlYAM0oryVShmhPVpZhzwt4eUhhdOlpgdo3JDvYck11jsqwUl6Xv1Vl9aUf0f7v-5FKAdycAix33AZPN3W-vfUglI-tj-M-IXx77pzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109787607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Winer, Leah K. ; Panzica, Nicole ; Lynch, Kenneth ; Parker, Catherine ; Lancaster, Rachael ; Gillis, Andrea ; Lindeman, Brenessa ; Chen, Herbert ; Fazendin, Jessica ; Cortez, Alexander R. ; Zmijewski, Polina</creator><creatorcontrib>Winer, Leah K. ; Panzica, Nicole ; Lynch, Kenneth ; Parker, Catherine ; Lancaster, Rachael ; Gillis, Andrea ; Lindeman, Brenessa ; Chen, Herbert ; Fazendin, Jessica ; Cortez, Alexander R. ; Zmijewski, Polina</creatorcontrib><description>It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience.
Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs.
There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p = 0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p = 0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of “misidentification,” “feeling unwelcome,” and “poor trust/autonomy.” To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments.
Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience.
[Display omitted]
•Prior studies reveal gender and sex-based differences in general surgery case logs and operative experience.•In this multicenter study, 53% of female general surgery residents felt that gender influences training quality.•Sexism and gender bias were the predominant perceived barriers to operating room participation for female residents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38719681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Consortia ; Demographics ; Discrimination ; Ethnicity ; Females ; Gender ; Gender disparities ; General surgery residency ; Human bias ; Nurses ; Operative experience ; Perceptions ; Polls & surveys ; Qualitative research ; Surgery ; Training</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2024-11, Vol.237, p.115755, Article 115755</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2024. Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0818-6439 ; 0000-0002-4481-5549 ; 0000-0003-1334-7567</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38719681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winer, Leah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lancaster, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillis, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeman, Brenessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazendin, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortez, Alexander R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zmijewski, Polina</creatorcontrib><title>Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience.
Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs.
There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p = 0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p = 0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of “misidentification,” “feeling unwelcome,” and “poor trust/autonomy.” To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments.
Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience.
[Display omitted]
•Prior studies reveal gender and sex-based differences in general surgery case logs and operative experience.•In this multicenter study, 53% of female general surgery residents felt that gender influences training quality.•Sexism and gender bias were the predominant perceived barriers to operating room participation for female residents.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender disparities</subject><subject>General surgery residency</subject><subject>Human bias</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Operative experience</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5SAl730mEq68-FFlsUvWBBEzyHdqZ5NM90Zk-5l5-4PN-2MHrwIBUnIU28V70vIS2BbYCDfDFs3DnlJuy1nvN6yUlw-IhvQylSgtXhMNowxXhkJ7II8y3koT4BaPCUXQiswUsOG_PyKOXicZnrAlA_YzeEeM40Tne-QprhHGnu6w8ljomGisWBuZSg-lGvAqUPqlxSm3UqVzz1dt8J0pOkk3R3pnFyYCvKWXtMxPKCvRpzvos80z4s_PidPerfP-OJ8XpLvH95_u_lU3X75-Pnm-rbqRA1zxRXXRivnGsYN1J6B422nuZJKN9KrpnY9Nw3re4BeNK0RAIqBcsa3Rra1uCRXJ91Dij8WzLMdQ-5wv3cTxiVbwRoBQhbzCvr6H3SIS5rKdlYAM0oryVShmhPVpZhzwt4eUhhdOlpgdo3JDvYck11jsqwUl6Xv1Vl9aUf0f7v-5FKAdycAix33AZPN3W-vfUglI-tj-M-IXx77pzc</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Winer, Leah K.</creator><creator>Panzica, Nicole</creator><creator>Lynch, Kenneth</creator><creator>Parker, Catherine</creator><creator>Lancaster, Rachael</creator><creator>Gillis, Andrea</creator><creator>Lindeman, Brenessa</creator><creator>Chen, Herbert</creator><creator>Fazendin, Jessica</creator><creator>Cortez, Alexander R.</creator><creator>Zmijewski, Polina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-6439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-5549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-7567</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study</title><author>Winer, Leah K. ; Panzica, Nicole ; Lynch, Kenneth ; Parker, Catherine ; Lancaster, Rachael ; Gillis, Andrea ; Lindeman, Brenessa ; Chen, Herbert ; Fazendin, Jessica ; Cortez, Alexander R. ; Zmijewski, Polina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender disparities</topic><topic>General surgery residency</topic><topic>Human bias</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Operative experience</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winer, Leah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzica, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lancaster, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillis, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeman, Brenessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazendin, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortez, Alexander R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zmijewski, Polina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winer, Leah K.</au><au>Panzica, Nicole</au><au>Lynch, Kenneth</au><au>Parker, Catherine</au><au>Lancaster, Rachael</au><au>Gillis, Andrea</au><au>Lindeman, Brenessa</au><au>Chen, Herbert</au><au>Fazendin, Jessica</au><au>Cortez, Alexander R.</au><au>Zmijewski, Polina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>237</volume><spage>115755</spage><pages>115755-</pages><artnum>115755</artnum><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>It remains unclear why female general surgery residents perform fewer cases than male peers. This exploratory study investigated possible contributors to gender-based disparities and solutions for improving equity in operative experience.
Surveys, including Likert scale and free-text questions, were distributed to 21 accredited general surgery residency programs.
There were 96 respondents, of whom 69% were female. 22% of females personally experienced barriers to operative experience versus 13% of males (p = 0.41), while 52% of female residents believed operative training was affected by gender (p = 0.004). Inductive analysis revealed the most common barrier to operating room participation was floor work/clinical tasks. The most common barrier for female residents was perceived sexism/gender bias, with subthemes of “misidentification,” “feeling unwelcome,” and “poor trust/autonomy.” To improve parity, residents proposed structured program-level review, feedback, and transparent expectations about case assignments.
Female general surgery residents believe gender bias impacts training. Further mixed-methods research is crucial to determine the cause of gender-based disparities in operative experience.
[Display omitted]
•Prior studies reveal gender and sex-based differences in general surgery case logs and operative experience.•In this multicenter study, 53% of female general surgery residents felt that gender influences training quality.•Sexism and gender bias were the predominant perceived barriers to operating room participation for female residents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38719681</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.026</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-6439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-5549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-7567</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2024-11, Vol.237, p.115755, Article 115755 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3053136883 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Bias Consortia Demographics Discrimination Ethnicity Females Gender Gender disparities General surgery residency Human bias Nurses Operative experience Perceptions Polls & surveys Qualitative research Surgery Training |
title | Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A42%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resident%20perspectives%20on%20the%20role%20of%20gender%20in%20operative%20experience%20during%20general%20surgery%20residency%20training:%20A%20mixed-methods%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Winer,%20Leah%20K.&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=237&rft.spage=115755&rft.pages=115755-&rft.artnum=115755&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3109787607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-2728987aa502914d01a2bc82767856d754af2950ff11f35b93117017a9db96b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109787607&rft_id=info:pmid/38719681&rfr_iscdi=true |