Loading…
A systematic review of psychosocial and sex-based contributors to gender disparities in the United States across the steps towards kidney transplantation
Persistent findings suggest women and patients identified as “female” are less likely to receive a kidney transplant. Furthermore, the limited research on transplantation among transgender and gender diverse people suggests this population is susceptible to many of the same psychosocial and systemic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transplantation reviews (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2024-07, Vol.38 (3), p.100858, Article 100858 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Persistent findings suggest women and patients identified as “female” are less likely to receive a kidney transplant. Furthermore, the limited research on transplantation among transgender and gender diverse people suggests this population is susceptible to many of the same psychosocial and systemic barriers.
This review sought to 1) highlight terminology used to elucidate gender disparities, 2) identify barriers present along the steps to transplantation, and 3) summarize contributors to gender disparities across the steps to transplantation.
A systematic review of gender and sex disparities in the steps towards kidney transplantation was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across four social science and public health databases from 2005 to 23.
The search yielded 1696 initial results, 33 of which met inclusion criteria. A majority of studies followed a retrospective cohort design (n = 22, 66.7%), inconsistently used gender and sex related terminology (n = 21, 63.6%), and reported significant findings for gender and sex disparities within the steps towards transplantation (n = 28, 84.8%). Gender disparities among the earlier steps were characterized by patient-provider communication and perception of medical suitability whereas disparities in the later steps were characterized by differential outcomes based on older age, an above average BMI, and Black racial identity. Findings for transgender patients pointed to issues computing eGFR and the need for culturally tailored care.
Providers should be encouraged to critically examine the diagnostic criteria used to determine transplant eligibility and adopt practices that can be culturally tailored to meet the needs of patients.
•Majority of studies used gender and sex terminology interchangeably with few addressing gender diverse identities•Majority of studies indicated that women and patients identified as female were more likely to experience delays or barriers•Findings for transgender patients pointed to issues computing eGFR and the need for culturally tailored care•Disparities in the earlier steps were characterized by patient-provider communication and perception of medical suitability•Disparities in later steps were more likely to impact those of older age, an above average BMI, and Black racial identity |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0955-470X 1557-9816 1557-9816 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100858 |