Loading…

The Kouvalchouk procedure vs. distal tibial allograft for treatment of posterior shoulder instability: the deltoid “hammock” effect exists

In 1993, Kouvalchouk described an acromial bone block with a pedicled deltoid flap for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. This procedure provides a “double blocking” effect in that the acromial autograft restores posterior glenoid bone loss and the deltoid flap functions as a muscular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2024-10, Vol.33 (10), p.e537-e546
Main Authors: Gao, Ryan, Fleet, Cole T., Jin, Winston, Johnson, James A., Faber, Kenneth J., Athwal, George S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f7b77bdf011ef1df70a41031ec1002810deecf8903c1ce1c7267a0e5b2979ef13
container_end_page e546
container_issue 10
container_start_page e537
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 33
creator Gao, Ryan
Fleet, Cole T.
Jin, Winston
Johnson, James A.
Faber, Kenneth J.
Athwal, George S.
description In 1993, Kouvalchouk described an acromial bone block with a pedicled deltoid flap for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. This procedure provides a “double blocking” effect in that the acromial autograft restores posterior glenoid bone loss and the deltoid flap functions as a muscular “hammock” resembling the sling effect of the conjoint in the Latarjet procedure. The primary aim of this study was to compare the Kouvalchouk procedure to distal tibial allograft (DTA) reconstruction for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss, while the secondary aim was to evaluate the deltoid hammock effect. Ten upper extremity cadavers were evaluated using a validated shoulder testing apparatus in 0° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Testing was first performed on the normal shoulder state and was followed by the creation of a 20% posterior glenoid defect. Subsequently, the Kouvalchouk and DTA procedures were conducted. Forces of 0N, 5N, 10N, and 15N were applied to the posterior deltoid tendinous insertion on the Kouvalchouk graft along the physiological muscle line-of-action to evaluate the ‘hammock” effect of this procedure. Testing was additionally performed on the Kouvalchouk bone graft with the deltoid muscle sectioned from its bony attachment. For all test states, a posteriorly directed force was applied to the humeral head perpendicular to the direction of the glenoid bone defect, with the associated translation quantified using an optical tracking system. The outcome variable was posterior translation of the humeral head at an applied force magnitude of 30N. The Kouvalchouk procedure with the loaded deltoid flap (10N: P = .039 and 15N: P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.047
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3055892136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S105827462400346X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3055892136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f7b77bdf011ef1df70a41031ec1002810deecf8903c1ce1c7267a0e5b2979ef13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuFDEQtBCIhMAHcEE-cpmhbc-MZ-CEIl4iEpdwtjx2m_XGs15sz4rc8gV8AfxcvgRHGzhy6larqlpVRchzBi0DNrzattuMLQfetSBa6OQDcsp6wZuhB3hYd-jHhstuOCFPct4CwNQBf0xOxCh7kKM8JT8vN0g_x_Wgg9nE9YruUzRo14T0kFtqfS460OJnX4cOIX5L2hXqYqIloS4L7gqNju5jLph8PecqEywm6neVO_vgy_VrWuobi6FEb-ntza-NXpZorm5vflN0Dk2h-KO-yk_JI6dDxmf384x8ff_u8vxjc_Hlw6fztxeN4aIvjZOzlLN1wBg6Zp0E3TEQDA0D4CMDi2jcOIEwzCAzkg9SA_Yzn-RUGeKMvDzqVrvfV8xFLT4bDEHvMK5ZCej7ceJMDBXKjlCTYs4Jndonv-h0rRiouxrUVtUa1F0NCoSqNVTOi3v5dV7Q_mP8zb0C3hwBWE0ePCaVjcddTd6nmoay0f9H_g-miZ2e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055892136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Kouvalchouk procedure vs. distal tibial allograft for treatment of posterior shoulder instability: the deltoid “hammock” effect exists</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Gao, Ryan ; Fleet, Cole T. ; Jin, Winston ; Johnson, James A. ; Faber, Kenneth J. ; Athwal, George S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ryan ; Fleet, Cole T. ; Jin, Winston ; Johnson, James A. ; Faber, Kenneth J. ; Athwal, George S.</creatorcontrib><description>In 1993, Kouvalchouk described an acromial bone block with a pedicled deltoid flap for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. This procedure provides a “double blocking” effect in that the acromial autograft restores posterior glenoid bone loss and the deltoid flap functions as a muscular “hammock” resembling the sling effect of the conjoint in the Latarjet procedure. The primary aim of this study was to compare the Kouvalchouk procedure to distal tibial allograft (DTA) reconstruction for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss, while the secondary aim was to evaluate the deltoid hammock effect. Ten upper extremity cadavers were evaluated using a validated shoulder testing apparatus in 0° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Testing was first performed on the normal shoulder state and was followed by the creation of a 20% posterior glenoid defect. Subsequently, the Kouvalchouk and DTA procedures were conducted. Forces of 0N, 5N, 10N, and 15N were applied to the posterior deltoid tendinous insertion on the Kouvalchouk graft along the physiological muscle line-of-action to evaluate the ‘hammock” effect of this procedure. Testing was additionally performed on the Kouvalchouk bone graft with the deltoid muscle sectioned from its bony attachment. For all test states, a posteriorly directed force was applied to the humeral head perpendicular to the direction of the glenoid bone defect, with the associated translation quantified using an optical tracking system. The outcome variable was posterior translation of the humeral head at an applied force magnitude of 30N. The Kouvalchouk procedure with the loaded deltoid flap (10N: P = .039 and 15N: P &lt; .001) was significantly better at reducing posterior humeral head translation than the DTA. Overall, increased glenohumeral stability was observed with increased force applied to the posterior deltoid flap in the Kouvalchouk procedure. The 15 N Kouvalchouk was most effective at preventing posterior humeral translation, and the difference was statistically significant compared with the 20% glenoid defect (P = .003), detached Kouvalchouk (P &lt; .001), and 0N Kouvalchouk (P &lt; .001). The 15 N Kouvalchouk procedure restored posterior shoulder joint stability to near normal levels, such that it was not significantly different from the intact state (P = .203). The Kouvalchouk procedure with load applied to the deltoid was found to be biomechanically superior to the DTA for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss. Additionally, the results confirmed the presence and effectiveness of the deltoid “hammock” effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.047</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38750787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>dislocation ; distal tibial allograft ; humeral head translation ; instability ; Kouvalchouk ; Posterior shoulder instability ; shoulder</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2024-10, Vol.33 (10), p.e537-e546</ispartof><rights>2024 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f7b77bdf011ef1df70a41031ec1002810deecf8903c1ce1c7267a0e5b2979ef13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8206-1680 ; 0000-0003-1025-6600 ; 0000-0002-5174-219X ; 0000-0002-7030-1170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38750787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleet, Cole T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Winston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athwal, George S.</creatorcontrib><title>The Kouvalchouk procedure vs. distal tibial allograft for treatment of posterior shoulder instability: the deltoid “hammock” effect exists</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>In 1993, Kouvalchouk described an acromial bone block with a pedicled deltoid flap for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. This procedure provides a “double blocking” effect in that the acromial autograft restores posterior glenoid bone loss and the deltoid flap functions as a muscular “hammock” resembling the sling effect of the conjoint in the Latarjet procedure. The primary aim of this study was to compare the Kouvalchouk procedure to distal tibial allograft (DTA) reconstruction for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss, while the secondary aim was to evaluate the deltoid hammock effect. Ten upper extremity cadavers were evaluated using a validated shoulder testing apparatus in 0° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Testing was first performed on the normal shoulder state and was followed by the creation of a 20% posterior glenoid defect. Subsequently, the Kouvalchouk and DTA procedures were conducted. Forces of 0N, 5N, 10N, and 15N were applied to the posterior deltoid tendinous insertion on the Kouvalchouk graft along the physiological muscle line-of-action to evaluate the ‘hammock” effect of this procedure. Testing was additionally performed on the Kouvalchouk bone graft with the deltoid muscle sectioned from its bony attachment. For all test states, a posteriorly directed force was applied to the humeral head perpendicular to the direction of the glenoid bone defect, with the associated translation quantified using an optical tracking system. The outcome variable was posterior translation of the humeral head at an applied force magnitude of 30N. The Kouvalchouk procedure with the loaded deltoid flap (10N: P = .039 and 15N: P &lt; .001) was significantly better at reducing posterior humeral head translation than the DTA. Overall, increased glenohumeral stability was observed with increased force applied to the posterior deltoid flap in the Kouvalchouk procedure. The 15 N Kouvalchouk was most effective at preventing posterior humeral translation, and the difference was statistically significant compared with the 20% glenoid defect (P = .003), detached Kouvalchouk (P &lt; .001), and 0N Kouvalchouk (P &lt; .001). The 15 N Kouvalchouk procedure restored posterior shoulder joint stability to near normal levels, such that it was not significantly different from the intact state (P = .203). The Kouvalchouk procedure with load applied to the deltoid was found to be biomechanically superior to the DTA for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss. Additionally, the results confirmed the presence and effectiveness of the deltoid “hammock” effect.</description><subject>dislocation</subject><subject>distal tibial allograft</subject><subject>humeral head translation</subject><subject>instability</subject><subject>Kouvalchouk</subject><subject>Posterior shoulder instability</subject><subject>shoulder</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UctuFDEQtBCIhMAHcEE-cpmhbc-MZ-CEIl4iEpdwtjx2m_XGs15sz4rc8gV8AfxcvgRHGzhy6larqlpVRchzBi0DNrzattuMLQfetSBa6OQDcsp6wZuhB3hYd-jHhstuOCFPct4CwNQBf0xOxCh7kKM8JT8vN0g_x_Wgg9nE9YruUzRo14T0kFtqfS460OJnX4cOIX5L2hXqYqIloS4L7gqNju5jLph8PecqEywm6neVO_vgy_VrWuobi6FEb-ntza-NXpZorm5vflN0Dk2h-KO-yk_JI6dDxmf384x8ff_u8vxjc_Hlw6fztxeN4aIvjZOzlLN1wBg6Zp0E3TEQDA0D4CMDi2jcOIEwzCAzkg9SA_Yzn-RUGeKMvDzqVrvfV8xFLT4bDEHvMK5ZCej7ceJMDBXKjlCTYs4Jndonv-h0rRiouxrUVtUa1F0NCoSqNVTOi3v5dV7Q_mP8zb0C3hwBWE0ePCaVjcddTd6nmoay0f9H_g-miZ2e</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Gao, Ryan</creator><creator>Fleet, Cole T.</creator><creator>Jin, Winston</creator><creator>Johnson, James A.</creator><creator>Faber, Kenneth J.</creator><creator>Athwal, George S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-1680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1025-6600</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5174-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-1170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>The Kouvalchouk procedure vs. distal tibial allograft for treatment of posterior shoulder instability: the deltoid “hammock” effect exists</title><author>Gao, Ryan ; Fleet, Cole T. ; Jin, Winston ; Johnson, James A. ; Faber, Kenneth J. ; Athwal, George S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f7b77bdf011ef1df70a41031ec1002810deecf8903c1ce1c7267a0e5b2979ef13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>dislocation</topic><topic>distal tibial allograft</topic><topic>humeral head translation</topic><topic>instability</topic><topic>Kouvalchouk</topic><topic>Posterior shoulder instability</topic><topic>shoulder</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleet, Cole T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Winston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athwal, George S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Ryan</au><au>Fleet, Cole T.</au><au>Jin, Winston</au><au>Johnson, James A.</au><au>Faber, Kenneth J.</au><au>Athwal, George S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Kouvalchouk procedure vs. distal tibial allograft for treatment of posterior shoulder instability: the deltoid “hammock” effect exists</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e537</spage><epage>e546</epage><pages>e537-e546</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>In 1993, Kouvalchouk described an acromial bone block with a pedicled deltoid flap for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability. This procedure provides a “double blocking” effect in that the acromial autograft restores posterior glenoid bone loss and the deltoid flap functions as a muscular “hammock” resembling the sling effect of the conjoint in the Latarjet procedure. The primary aim of this study was to compare the Kouvalchouk procedure to distal tibial allograft (DTA) reconstruction for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss, while the secondary aim was to evaluate the deltoid hammock effect. Ten upper extremity cadavers were evaluated using a validated shoulder testing apparatus in 0° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Testing was first performed on the normal shoulder state and was followed by the creation of a 20% posterior glenoid defect. Subsequently, the Kouvalchouk and DTA procedures were conducted. Forces of 0N, 5N, 10N, and 15N were applied to the posterior deltoid tendinous insertion on the Kouvalchouk graft along the physiological muscle line-of-action to evaluate the ‘hammock” effect of this procedure. Testing was additionally performed on the Kouvalchouk bone graft with the deltoid muscle sectioned from its bony attachment. For all test states, a posteriorly directed force was applied to the humeral head perpendicular to the direction of the glenoid bone defect, with the associated translation quantified using an optical tracking system. The outcome variable was posterior translation of the humeral head at an applied force magnitude of 30N. The Kouvalchouk procedure with the loaded deltoid flap (10N: P = .039 and 15N: P &lt; .001) was significantly better at reducing posterior humeral head translation than the DTA. Overall, increased glenohumeral stability was observed with increased force applied to the posterior deltoid flap in the Kouvalchouk procedure. The 15 N Kouvalchouk was most effective at preventing posterior humeral translation, and the difference was statistically significant compared with the 20% glenoid defect (P = .003), detached Kouvalchouk (P &lt; .001), and 0N Kouvalchouk (P &lt; .001). The 15 N Kouvalchouk procedure restored posterior shoulder joint stability to near normal levels, such that it was not significantly different from the intact state (P = .203). The Kouvalchouk procedure with load applied to the deltoid was found to be biomechanically superior to the DTA for the management of posterior shoulder instability with associated bone loss. Additionally, the results confirmed the presence and effectiveness of the deltoid “hammock” effect.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38750787</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.047</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-1680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1025-6600</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5174-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-1170</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2024-10, Vol.33 (10), p.e537-e546
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3055892136
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects dislocation
distal tibial allograft
humeral head translation
instability
Kouvalchouk
Posterior shoulder instability
shoulder
title The Kouvalchouk procedure vs. distal tibial allograft for treatment of posterior shoulder instability: the deltoid “hammock” effect exists
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A18%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Kouvalchouk%20procedure%20vs.%20distal%20tibial%20allograft%20for%20treatment%20of%20posterior%20shoulder%20instability:%20the%20deltoid%20%E2%80%9Chammock%E2%80%9D%20effect%20exists&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Gao,%20Ryan&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e537&rft.epage=e546&rft.pages=e537-e546&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.047&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3055892136%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-f7b77bdf011ef1df70a41031ec1002810deecf8903c1ce1c7267a0e5b2979ef13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055892136&rft_id=info:pmid/38750787&rfr_iscdi=true