Loading…

Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps

Objective Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐B...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2024-11, Vol.167 (2), p.641-647
Main Authors: Cuerva, Marcos Javier, Villasante, Pilar, Cruset, Mariona, Pintado, Carmen, Perez De Aguado, Marta, Cortes, Marta, Lopez, Francisco, Bartha, José Luis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3
container_end_page 647
container_issue 2
container_start_page 641
container_title International journal of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 167
creator Cuerva, Marcos Javier
Villasante, Pilar
Cruset, Mariona
Pintado, Carmen
Perez De Aguado, Marta
Cortes, Marta
Lopez, Francisco
Bartha, José Luis
description Objective Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model. Methods This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps‐assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator‐assessed difficulty. Results Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments. Conclusion This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes. Synopsis Thierry spatulas are gentlest on the fetal head, Simpson forceps are favored by experienced obstetricians for perineal pressure, and Kielland forceps offer an alternative with similar outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijgo.15613
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3057072533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3057072533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4QDIS4SU4p84TlaoVFAKSF1QxDJyEqd1lcTBdkDZcQTWHI-TkP7AktWM3nx6mpkHwClGQ4wQuVSrhR5iFmC6B_o45JFHfR7tg343RB4nEemBI2tXCCHMMT4EPRrygBMc9sHXy1KlS-jaWkKdw1ybVNYWKgsT6Zw0awVWujLaCad0JQqoa2m6_k3CRBm3tFdwBK0qm2IDQOuarIWpLmthVLWA86WSxrTQ1sJ1jIWiyuCTKmurq--Pz2sjmmqjPShZFOtmt8QxOMhFYeXJrg7A8-3NfHznPc4m0_Ho0Usp8akXIp8QRpCf8ISxIAtp1OkB5WGeozTKGUkyQv0sR4xhHODu7CAJwyySIsM-EXQAzre-tdGvjbQuLpVNN7tI3diYIsYRJ4zSDr3YoqnR1hqZx7VRpTBtjFG8ziJeZxFvsujgs51vk5Qy-0N_n98BeAu8q0K2_1jF0_vJbGv6A9Qkl0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3057072533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Cuerva, Marcos Javier ; Villasante, Pilar ; Cruset, Mariona ; Pintado, Carmen ; Perez De Aguado, Marta ; Cortes, Marta ; Lopez, Francisco ; Bartha, José Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos Javier ; Villasante, Pilar ; Cruset, Mariona ; Pintado, Carmen ; Perez De Aguado, Marta ; Cortes, Marta ; Lopez, Francisco ; Bartha, José Luis</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model. Methods This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps‐assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator‐assessed difficulty. Results Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments. Conclusion This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes. Synopsis Thierry spatulas are gentlest on the fetal head, Simpson forceps are favored by experienced obstetricians for perineal pressure, and Kielland forceps offer an alternative with similar outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15613</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38767218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>assisted birth ; birth ; birth injuries ; Equipment Design ; Extraction, Obstetrical - instrumentation ; Female ; Humans ; Obstetrical Forceps ; operative birth ; Perineum ; Pregnancy ; Pressure ; Simulation Training</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-11, Vol.167 (2), p.641-647</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38767218$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villasante, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruset, Mariona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintado, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez De Aguado, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartha, José Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Objective Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model. Methods This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps‐assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator‐assessed difficulty. Results Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments. Conclusion This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes. Synopsis Thierry spatulas are gentlest on the fetal head, Simpson forceps are favored by experienced obstetricians for perineal pressure, and Kielland forceps offer an alternative with similar outcomes.</description><subject>assisted birth</subject><subject>birth</subject><subject>birth injuries</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Extraction, Obstetrical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obstetrical Forceps</subject><subject>operative birth</subject><subject>Perineum</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Simulation Training</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4QDIS4SU4p84TlaoVFAKSF1QxDJyEqd1lcTBdkDZcQTWHI-TkP7AktWM3nx6mpkHwClGQ4wQuVSrhR5iFmC6B_o45JFHfR7tg343RB4nEemBI2tXCCHMMT4EPRrygBMc9sHXy1KlS-jaWkKdw1ybVNYWKgsT6Zw0awVWujLaCad0JQqoa2m6_k3CRBm3tFdwBK0qm2IDQOuarIWpLmthVLWA86WSxrTQ1sJ1jIWiyuCTKmurq--Pz2sjmmqjPShZFOtmt8QxOMhFYeXJrg7A8-3NfHznPc4m0_Ho0Usp8akXIp8QRpCf8ISxIAtp1OkB5WGeozTKGUkyQv0sR4xhHODu7CAJwyySIsM-EXQAzre-tdGvjbQuLpVNN7tI3diYIsYRJ4zSDr3YoqnR1hqZx7VRpTBtjFG8ziJeZxFvsujgs51vk5Qy-0N_n98BeAu8q0K2_1jF0_vJbGv6A9Qkl0Q</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Cuerva, Marcos Javier</creator><creator>Villasante, Pilar</creator><creator>Cruset, Mariona</creator><creator>Pintado, Carmen</creator><creator>Perez De Aguado, Marta</creator><creator>Cortes, Marta</creator><creator>Lopez, Francisco</creator><creator>Bartha, José Luis</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps</title><author>Cuerva, Marcos Javier ; Villasante, Pilar ; Cruset, Mariona ; Pintado, Carmen ; Perez De Aguado, Marta ; Cortes, Marta ; Lopez, Francisco ; Bartha, José Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>assisted birth</topic><topic>birth</topic><topic>birth injuries</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Extraction, Obstetrical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obstetrical Forceps</topic><topic>operative birth</topic><topic>Perineum</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Simulation Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villasante, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruset, Mariona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintado, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez De Aguado, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartha, José Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuerva, Marcos Javier</au><au>Villasante, Pilar</au><au>Cruset, Mariona</au><au>Pintado, Carmen</au><au>Perez De Aguado, Marta</au><au>Cortes, Marta</au><au>Lopez, Francisco</au><au>Bartha, José Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>167</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>647</epage><pages>641-647</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>Objective Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model. Methods This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps‐assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator‐assessed difficulty. Results Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments. Conclusion This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes. Synopsis Thierry spatulas are gentlest on the fetal head, Simpson forceps are favored by experienced obstetricians for perineal pressure, and Kielland forceps offer an alternative with similar outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38767218</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijgo.15613</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7292
ispartof International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-11, Vol.167 (2), p.641-647
issn 0020-7292
1879-3479
1879-3479
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3057072533
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects assisted birth
birth
birth injuries
Equipment Design
Extraction, Obstetrical - instrumentation
Female
Humans
Obstetrical Forceps
operative birth
Perineum
Pregnancy
Pressure
Simulation Training
title Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20type%20of%20forceps%20is%20better%20for%20nonrotational%20operative%20births?%20A%20simulation%20study%20comparing%20Thierry%20spatulas%20and%20Simpson%E2%80%90Braun%20and%20Kielland%20forceps&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Cuerva,%20Marcos%20Javier&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=167&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=647&rft.pages=641-647&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijgo.15613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3057072533%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3057072533&rft_id=info:pmid/38767218&rfr_iscdi=true