Loading…
Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps
Objective Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐B...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2024-11, Vol.167 (2), p.641-647 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3 |
container_end_page | 647 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 641 |
container_title | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics |
container_volume | 167 |
creator | Cuerva, Marcos Javier Villasante, Pilar Cruset, Mariona Pintado, Carmen Perez De Aguado, Marta Cortes, Marta Lopez, Francisco Bartha, José Luis |
description | Objective
Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model.
Methods
This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps‐assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator‐assessed difficulty.
Results
Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments.
Conclusion
This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes.
Synopsis
Thierry spatulas are gentlest on the fetal head, Simpson forceps are favored by experienced obstetricians for perineal pressure, and Kielland forceps offer an alternative with similar outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijgo.15613 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3057072533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3057072533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4QDIS4SU4p84TlaoVFAKSF1QxDJyEqd1lcTBdkDZcQTWHI-TkP7AktWM3nx6mpkHwClGQ4wQuVSrhR5iFmC6B_o45JFHfR7tg343RB4nEemBI2tXCCHMMT4EPRrygBMc9sHXy1KlS-jaWkKdw1ybVNYWKgsT6Zw0awVWujLaCad0JQqoa2m6_k3CRBm3tFdwBK0qm2IDQOuarIWpLmthVLWA86WSxrTQ1sJ1jIWiyuCTKmurq--Pz2sjmmqjPShZFOtmt8QxOMhFYeXJrg7A8-3NfHznPc4m0_Ho0Usp8akXIp8QRpCf8ISxIAtp1OkB5WGeozTKGUkyQv0sR4xhHODu7CAJwyySIsM-EXQAzre-tdGvjbQuLpVNN7tI3diYIsYRJ4zSDr3YoqnR1hqZx7VRpTBtjFG8ziJeZxFvsujgs51vk5Qy-0N_n98BeAu8q0K2_1jF0_vJbGv6A9Qkl0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3057072533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Cuerva, Marcos Javier ; Villasante, Pilar ; Cruset, Mariona ; Pintado, Carmen ; Perez De Aguado, Marta ; Cortes, Marta ; Lopez, Francisco ; Bartha, José Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos Javier ; Villasante, Pilar ; Cruset, Mariona ; Pintado, Carmen ; Perez De Aguado, Marta ; Cortes, Marta ; Lopez, Francisco ; Bartha, José Luis</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model.
Methods
This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps‐assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator‐assessed difficulty.
Results
Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments.
Conclusion
This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes.
Synopsis
Thierry spatulas are gentlest on the fetal head, Simpson forceps are favored by experienced obstetricians for perineal pressure, and Kielland forceps offer an alternative with similar outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15613</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38767218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>assisted birth ; birth ; birth injuries ; Equipment Design ; Extraction, Obstetrical - instrumentation ; Female ; Humans ; Obstetrical Forceps ; operative birth ; Perineum ; Pregnancy ; Pressure ; Simulation Training</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-11, Vol.167 (2), p.641-647</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38767218$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villasante, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruset, Mariona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintado, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez De Aguado, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartha, José Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Objective
Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model.
Methods
This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps‐assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator‐assessed difficulty.
Results
Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments.
Conclusion
This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes.
Synopsis
Thierry spatulas are gentlest on the fetal head, Simpson forceps are favored by experienced obstetricians for perineal pressure, and Kielland forceps offer an alternative with similar outcomes.</description><subject>assisted birth</subject><subject>birth</subject><subject>birth injuries</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Extraction, Obstetrical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obstetrical Forceps</subject><subject>operative birth</subject><subject>Perineum</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Simulation Training</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4QDIS4SU4p84TlaoVFAKSF1QxDJyEqd1lcTBdkDZcQTWHI-TkP7AktWM3nx6mpkHwClGQ4wQuVSrhR5iFmC6B_o45JFHfR7tg343RB4nEemBI2tXCCHMMT4EPRrygBMc9sHXy1KlS-jaWkKdw1ybVNYWKgsT6Zw0awVWujLaCad0JQqoa2m6_k3CRBm3tFdwBK0qm2IDQOuarIWpLmthVLWA86WSxrTQ1sJ1jIWiyuCTKmurq--Pz2sjmmqjPShZFOtmt8QxOMhFYeXJrg7A8-3NfHznPc4m0_Ho0Usp8akXIp8QRpCf8ISxIAtp1OkB5WGeozTKGUkyQv0sR4xhHODu7CAJwyySIsM-EXQAzre-tdGvjbQuLpVNN7tI3diYIsYRJ4zSDr3YoqnR1hqZx7VRpTBtjFG8ziJeZxFvsujgs51vk5Qy-0N_n98BeAu8q0K2_1jF0_vJbGv6A9Qkl0Q</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Cuerva, Marcos Javier</creator><creator>Villasante, Pilar</creator><creator>Cruset, Mariona</creator><creator>Pintado, Carmen</creator><creator>Perez De Aguado, Marta</creator><creator>Cortes, Marta</creator><creator>Lopez, Francisco</creator><creator>Bartha, José Luis</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps</title><author>Cuerva, Marcos Javier ; Villasante, Pilar ; Cruset, Mariona ; Pintado, Carmen ; Perez De Aguado, Marta ; Cortes, Marta ; Lopez, Francisco ; Bartha, José Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>assisted birth</topic><topic>birth</topic><topic>birth injuries</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Extraction, Obstetrical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obstetrical Forceps</topic><topic>operative birth</topic><topic>Perineum</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Simulation Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villasante, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruset, Mariona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintado, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez De Aguado, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartha, José Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuerva, Marcos Javier</au><au>Villasante, Pilar</au><au>Cruset, Mariona</au><au>Pintado, Carmen</au><au>Perez De Aguado, Marta</au><au>Cortes, Marta</au><au>Lopez, Francisco</au><au>Bartha, José Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>167</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>647</epage><pages>641-647</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>Objective
Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps‐assisted births using Simpson‐Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model.
Methods
This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps‐assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator‐assessed difficulty.
Results
Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments.
Conclusion
This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes.
Synopsis
Thierry spatulas are gentlest on the fetal head, Simpson forceps are favored by experienced obstetricians for perineal pressure, and Kielland forceps offer an alternative with similar outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38767218</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijgo.15613</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7292 |
ispartof | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-11, Vol.167 (2), p.641-647 |
issn | 0020-7292 1879-3479 1879-3479 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3057072533 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | assisted birth birth birth injuries Equipment Design Extraction, Obstetrical - instrumentation Female Humans Obstetrical Forceps operative birth Perineum Pregnancy Pressure Simulation Training |
title | Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson‐Braun and Kielland forceps |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20type%20of%20forceps%20is%20better%20for%20nonrotational%20operative%20births?%20A%20simulation%20study%20comparing%20Thierry%20spatulas%20and%20Simpson%E2%80%90Braun%20and%20Kielland%20forceps&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Cuerva,%20Marcos%20Javier&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=167&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=647&rft.pages=641-647&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijgo.15613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3057072533%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-804225204b7b556d8393246378ff0c9f52bd234df05511612186b88d9ead142a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3057072533&rft_id=info:pmid/38767218&rfr_iscdi=true |