Determining the optimal distal resection margin in rectal cancer patients by imaging of large pathological sections: An experimental study

• Published in: Medicine (Baltimore) 2024-05, Vol.103 (21), p.e38083-e38083
• Main Authors: Lin, Shuhan, Wei, Jie, Lai, Hao, Zhu, Yazhen, Gong, Han, Wei, Chengjiang, Wei, Binglin, Luo, Yinxiang, Liu, Yi, Mo, Xianwei, Zuo, Hongqun, Lin, Yuan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Margins of Excision; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Operative Time; Organ Sparing Treatments - methods; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
• ISSN: 0025-7974; 1536-5964
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038083

To determine the distal resection margin in sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with low rectal cancer based on imaging of large pathological sections. Patients who underwent sphincter-sparing surgery for ultralow rectal cancer at Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital within the period from January 2016 to March 2022 were tracked and observed. The clinical and pathological data of the patients were collected and analyzed. The EVOS fluorescence automatic cell imaging system was used for imaging large pathological sections. Follow-up patient data were acquired mainly by sending the patients letters and contacting them via phone calls, and during outpatient visits. A total of 46 patients (25 males, 21 females) aged 27 to 86 years participated in the present study. Regarding clinical staging, there were 9, 10, 16, and 10 cases with stages I, II, III, and IV low rectal cancer, respectively. The surgical time was 273.82 ± 111.51 minutes, the blood loss was 123.78 ± 150.91 mL, the postoperative exhaust time was 3.67 ± 1.85 days, and the postoperative discharge time was 10.36 ± 5.41 days. There were 8 patients with complications, including 3 cases of pulmonary infection, 2 cases of intestinal obstruction, one case of pleural effusion, and one case of stoma necrosis. The longest and shortest distal resection margins (distances between the cutting edges and the tumor edges) were 3 cm and 1 cm, respectively. The minimum length of the extension areas of the tumor lesions in the 46 images of large pathological sections was 0.1 mm, and the maximum length was 15 mm. Among the tumor lesions, 91.30% (42/46) had an extension area length of ≤5 mm, and 97.83% (45/46) had an extension area length of ≤10 mm. The length of the extension zone was not related to clinical pathological parameters (P > .05). In the vast majority of cases, the distal resection margin was at least 1 cm; thus, "No Evidence of Disease" could have been achieved. Additional high-powered randomized trials are needed to confirm the results of the present study.