Loading…
Hydrogen bond formation may enhance RDC‐based discrimination of enantiomers
The distinction of enantiomers based on residual anisotropic parameters obtained by alignment in chiral poly‐γ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate (PBLG) is among the strongest in high‐resolution NMR spectroscopy. However, large variations in enantiodifferentiation among different solutes are frequently observed. On...
Saved in:
Published in: | Magnetic resonance in chemistry 2024-09, Vol.62 (9), p.639-647 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The distinction of enantiomers based on residual anisotropic parameters obtained by alignment in chiral poly‐γ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate (PBLG) is among the strongest in high‐resolution NMR spectroscopy. However, large variations in enantiodifferentiation among different solutes are frequently observed. One hypothesis is that the formation of hydrogen bonds between solute and PBLG is important for the distinction of enantiomers. With a small set of three almost spherical enantiomeric pairs, for which 1DCH residual dipolar couplings are measured, we address this issue in a systematic way: borneol contains a single functional group that can act as a hydrogen bond donor, camphor has a single group that may act as a hydrogen bond acceptor, and quinuclidinol can act as both hydrogen bond donor and acceptor. The results are unambiguous: although camphor shows low enantiodifferentiation with PBLG and alignment that can be predicted well by the purely steric TRAMITE approach, the distinction of enantiomers for the other enantiomeric pairs is significantly higher with alignment properties that must involve a specific interaction in addition to steric alignment.
What causes enantiomeric distinction in chiral orienting media? Three molecules with different H‐bonding patterns are studied. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0749-1581 1097-458X 1097-458X |
DOI: | 10.1002/mrc.5448 |