The effects of psychotherapy for anhedonia on subcortical brain volumes measured with ultra-high field MRI

• Published in: Journal of affective disorders 2024-09, Vol.361, p.128-138
• Main Authors: Gibson, Kathryn, Cernasov, Paul, Styner, Martin, Walsh, Erin C., Kinard, Jessica L., Kelley, Lisalynn, Bizzell, Joshua, Phillips, Rachel, Pfister, Courtney, Scott, McRae, Freeman, Louise, Pisoni, Angela, Nagy, Gabriela A., Oliver, Jason A., Smoski, Moria J., Dichter, Gabriel S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anhedonia; Caudate nucleus; Clinical trial; Psychotherapy; Structural MRI
• ISSN: 0165-0327; 1573-2517; 1573-2517
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.140

Anhedonia is a transdiagnostic symptom often resistant to treatment. The identification of biomarkers sensitive to anhedonia treatment will aid in the evaluation of novel anhedonia interventions. This is an exploratory analysis of changes in subcortical brain volumes accompanying psychotherapy in a transdiagnostic anhedonic sample using ultra-high field (7-Tesla) MRI. Outpatients with clinically impairing anhedonia (n = 116) received Behavioral Activation Treatment for Anhedonia, a novel psychotherapy, or Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers NCT02874534 and NCT04036136). Subcortical brain volumes were estimated via the MultisegPipeline, and regions of interest were the amygdala, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, pallidum, putamen, and thalamus. Bivariate mixed effects models estimated pre-treatment relations between anhedonia severity and subcortical brain volumes, change over time in subcortical brain volumes, and associations between changes in subcortical brain volumes and changes in anhedonia symptoms. As reported previously (Cernasov et al., 2023), both forms of psychotherapy resulted in equivalent and significant reductions in anhedonia symptoms. Pre-treatment anhedonia severity and subcortical brain volumes were not related. No changes in subcortical brain volumes were observed over the course of treatment. Additionally, no relations were observed between changes in subcortical brain volumes and changes in anhedonia severity over the course of treatment. This trial included a modest sample size and did not have a waitlist-control condition or a non-anhedonic comparison group. In this exploratory analysis, psychotherapy for anhedonia was not accompanied by changes in subcortical brain volumes, suggesting that subcortical brain volumes may not be a candidate biomarker sensitive to response to psychotherapy. •Pre-treatment anhedonia severity and pre-treatment subcortical brain volumes were not related.•Psychotherapy for anhedonia was not accompanied by changes in subcortical brain volumes.•There was a modest relation between pre-treatment anhedonia and change in caudate nucleus volumes during treatment.•Subcortical brain volumes may not be a candidate biomarker sensitive to response to psychotherapy.